Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2008, 03:41 AM   #41 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
I would tend to agree that the military in the US has been increasingly underfunded and understaffed since 9/11.

It was the day before 9/11 that Rumsfeld held his meeting with the top brass at the Pentagon and began the process of hollowing out the military. He managed to do this hollowing out to the best of his ability. All non essential (and even some essential) services have been outsourced. The US Military has been largely privatized.

So while military spending has increased (in the form of transferring public money into private hands) the spending on Military has decreased.

I think the US needs to get back into the business of looking after its own Military.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 06:47 AM   #42 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorgelito View Post
Absolutely. We need way more funding for sure. Our military is vastly underfunded, it's embarrassing.
Wait a minute...I thought the current bloated amount Americans spend on military was the embarrassing thing. I think maybe you want to rejig how the money is spent. To spend even more is ridiculous. Your education system is failing, your social security is at risk, you can't even look after your veterans, your disparity between rich and poor is making some parts look like Third World countries, and you want more spending on military? When your budget already makes up around 47% of the world's military spending? How much impact will more money have when your spending is already so high? What about your national debt? Between the U.S. and Russia, do you know who's balancing their books better right now? I'm not sure. But what I do know is that Russia's public debt is sitting at 5.9% of GDP (of which has been growing faster than most G8 countries), while the U.S. sits at 60.8%. There is something wrong with your economy, and much of it might have to do with your military. Is this a reasonable expense? Can you afford this?

Quote:
$700 billion for corporate welfare and socialism is a disgrace. Our soldiers need to be equipped properly and paid.
I think you mean corporate welfare and corrupt socialism.

I don't know how American military personnel cannot be properly equipped with that kind of budget. Something is amiss. Is it corruption? Is it foolish spending? What is it?

And I thought the military base pay was raised this year in Congress?

Quote:
I am not in favor of the Iraq method. What a disaster. The Iraqis need to pay their bill.
I don't think anyone is in favour of it. Except maybe contractors. Iraqis might have a bill to pay, but America should establish a generous aid program. Along the lines of what Japan received after the war, but to scale, of course.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 09-27-2008 at 06:55 AM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:22 AM   #43 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Baraka... the budget isn't being spent on soldiers and equipment... or rather it but it is being shifted to private soldiers and their equipment. Companies like Blackwater have sizable, well-equipped armies of private soldiers. Financed by the US government.

I wonder how long it will take before they come into play in domestic politics?
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:22 AM   #44 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the american military is underfunded?
on what planet?
not this one:

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation: The FY 2009 Pentagon Spending Request - Global Military Spending

notice that the united states alone accounts for almost half of the global total expenditures on military toys in 2008---711 billion of a total 1473.

here's a graphic showing expenditures during the bush period:

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation: U.S. Defense Spending, 2001-2009

here's a category summary which outlines where this obscene amount of money goes (by category. you know.)

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation: The FY 2009 Pentagon Spending Request - Topline

this outlines expenditure levels of ballistic missle systems:

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation: The FY 2009 Pentagon Spending Request - Ballistic Missile Defense

it's convenient to look at this stuff---the data these graphics relies upon is available on the website (directly and via links)

so i don't know what you folks are talking about when you say "the military is underfunded"---the levels of funding are grotesque.
within that, there's problems of allocation obviously.
but this system has been the mainspring of republican-specific policy regarding "free markets"---so you see when the state is buying ridiculous amounts of military toys etc. then everything's hunky dory, but when it moves away from being a patronage spigot for political allies of the republican party, suddenly there's "socialism"

the disengenuousness of the conservative position is obvious.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:38 AM   #45 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
^^^ agree, but i think the spigot works equally well for both elements of the Property Party with two right wings.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:43 AM   #46 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan View Post
Baraka... the budget isn't being spent on soldiers and equipment... or rather it but it is being shifted to private soldiers and their equipment. Companies like Blackwater have sizable, well-equipped armies of private soldiers. Financed by the US government.

I wonder how long it will take before they come into play in domestic politics?
I don't know, but as I (and roachboy) suggested, I think this is an allocation problem, not an overall budget problem.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:16 AM   #47 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
Factors in the near term and present:

- Roughly 1/2 trillion dollars per annum of debt servicing payments
- $700bn+ in defence spending per annum
- probable year+ long recession on the cards
- inflation officially at around 3-4% (more like 8-10% or more using older standards and measures)
- SS and Medicare about to be clobbered by retiring boomers
- all told, probably 2-3 trillion in bailouts and other dubious economic measures, via magicing money into the economy and piling on even more debt repayments - i think the debt repayments look like being somewhere near 600bn for next year? (The Fed accepting Junk Bonds and equities at the discount window? *shudders* )

Where, exactly, would the pro-military folks see the funds for further cash/debt-sinks into military consumption coming from?

Printing money? >.<
Borrowing more, pushing repayments even higher? >.<
Enslaving other nations in more traditional imperial fashion? (hey, it'd help economically! didn't interest rates in Rome fall dramatically when Egypt was conquered? Conquer Egypt, not Afghanistan! ) >.<

The end of imperialism usually means exactly the opposite.

(why is all this in a thread about Russia? *shrugs*)
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:54 AM   #48 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by tisonlyi View Post
(why is all this in a thread about Russia? *shrugs*)
Well I think it would be interesting to contrast the military expansionism of America to Russia these days.

I find it a bit annoying to hear American politicians morally lambasting Russia on Georgia when you take Iraq, Afghanistan, etc, into account.

This is a thread about Russia and our worries of another cold war. America's military is a very big factor.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 04:19 PM   #49 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
I don't know, but as I (and roachboy) suggested, I think this is an allocation problem, not an overall budget problem.
I don't disagree. I think the money the US is spending on military overall (whether on the actual Military or the private military buildup) is obscene.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-28-2008, 05:57 AM   #50 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
This is a handy summary of why I think there's a change of epoch coming.

This really deserves its own thread.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--

Last edited by tisonlyi; 09-28-2008 at 06:05 AM..
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 07:41 AM   #51 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
I'm pretty sure that when people argue our military's budget isn't big enough, they really want more boots on the ground.
Unless those people are military contractors...but for everyday people they probably equate military budgets to necessities and primarily things that are troop-centric.

I think this flows from the discussion revolving around making sure we have enough troops and that they are properly compensated and geared, but the official response is that we have enough soldiers because our recruitment levels are being met as if the argument was we didn't have enough people wanting to work in the military. It follows that two rational responses would be either a) hire more people or b) quit sending what we've got all over the globe depending on one's personal stance about war/global military presence.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:06 AM   #52 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
A cold-war gesture or coincidence?

Quote:
Canadian jets scrambled to intercept Russian bomber before Obama visit
Last Updated: Friday, February 27, 2009 | 9:44 AM ET Comments296Recommend255
CBC News

Canadian fighter jets scrambled to intercept a Russian plane approaching Canadian airspace shortly before U.S. President Barack Obama visited Ottawa, the defence minister said Friday.
A Canadian F-18 lands at the Aviano air base in northern Italy in 1999.A Canadian F-18 lands at the Aviano air base in northern Italy in 1999. (Franco De Bernardi/Associated Press)

Peter MacKay said he wasn't accusing Russia of deliberately timing the flight to coincide with the visit — when Canadian security was focused in Ottawa — but he did call it a "strong coincidence."

"It was a strong coincidence which we met with … CF-18 fighter planes and world-class pilots that know their business," said MacKay.

"[The pilots] sent a strong signal they should back off and stay out of our airspace."

MacKay confirmed the incident at a news conference Friday in Ottawa with the chief of the defence staff, Gen. Walter Natynczyk, and the commander of NORAD, Gen. Gene Renuart.

The CF-18s took off from Cold Lake, Alta., on Feb. 16 after North American Aerospace Defence Command (Norad) detected the Russian Bear long-range bomber headed for Canadian airspace. The aircraft never did enter North American airspace.

Obama arrived in Ottawa on Feb. 19 to meet with Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He spent six hours in the nation's capital.
No comment from Russian ambassador

Russian aircraft regularly probed into North American airspace during the Cold War and Canadian and American fighters routinely tracked the snoopers and escorted them back into international airspace.

Such flights were suspended for years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but resumed in recent years as Russia pushed its claim on the Arctic and oil wealth allowed the country to spend more on its military.

MacKay said Canada has seen "increased activity" in recent years.

Norad spokesman Michael Kucharek wouldn't say what signals the pilots sent to the Russians, but did say they were close enough to make visual identification.

"Visual identification is enough to get their attention," he said.

Kucharek said it's possible the Russian plane was taking part in a military exercise.

"These types of exercises occur and have occurred over the past few years in quite a few different times and places."

Russia's ambassador to Canada, Georgiy Mamedov, will not be commenting on the incident Friday, said the Russian Embassy, but he may comment on Monday.
Rival Arctic claims

Melting Arctic ice has increased the chances of a standoff between countries that claim a stake in the region. The Arctic seabed, an area as large as the Prairie provinces, could be abundant in natural resources such as oil and gas.

The region is currently divided among Canada, the United States, Norway, Russia and Denmark.

Countries that ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea have 10 years to prove their continental shelves extend beyond the 370-kilometre (200-nautical-mile) outer limit currently in place. Since Canada ratified the convention in 2003, it has until 2013 to submit scientific evidence to extend that limit.

Russia claims the Arctic seabed and Siberia are linked by the same continental shelf. The UN rejected the claim, citing lack of evidence, but the country is set to resubmit the application in 2009.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said Arctic sovereignty is a key priority of his government and has promised to beef up Canada's military presence in the region. The Tory government has also moved to increase the jurisdiction of Canadian environmental law over northern waters and made it mandatory for vessels there to register with the Canadian Coast Guard.

Canadian scientists are mapping the seabed in an effort to bolster Canada's claim.

Two years ago, Russia sent a mini-submarine to plant a flag on the ocean floor at the North Pole.

MacKay, who was foreign affairs minister at the time, scoffed at the move, saying, "You can't go around the world these days dropping a flag somewhere, this isn't the 14th or 15th century."
With files from the Canadian Press
Canadian jets scrambled to intercept Russian bomber before Obama visit

Only recently has Russia resumed patrols probing nearby North American airspace; the first time since their collapse after the cold war. That they came close to entering Canadian airspace at the same time as Obama's visit to Ottawa is an interesting coincidence, if that's what it indeed was.

What do you guys think?

Much of the northern territory is opening up due to melting ice. It could become a hotly contested area, considering the potential resources there.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

Tags
russia


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360