Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2008, 11:29 AM   #1 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Hillary Clinton to be put in the nomination at the DNC

Quote:
View: Clinton’s Name Will Be Put in Nomination
Source: NYTimes
posted with the TFP thread generator

Clinton’s Name Will Be Put in Nomination
August 14, 2008, 10:50 am
Clinton’s Name Will Be Put in Nomination
By Jeff Zeleny

Updated |12:25: Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s name will be placed into nomination at the Democratic National Convention, a symbolic move approved by the Obama campaign in an effort to soothe a lingering rift with Clinton supporters.

“I am convinced that honoring Senator Clinton’s historic campaign in this way will help us celebrate this defining moment in our history and bring the party together in a strong united fashion,” Senator Barack Obama said in a statement.

The decision was announced on Thursday afternoon in a joint statement from the senators.

It comes after long negotiations on both sides, with many backers of Mrs. Clinton vigorously pushing for her candidacy to be validated by giving her delegates the chance to support her through a roll call vote.

“With every voice heard and the Party strongly united, we will elect Senator Obama President of the United States and put our nation on the path to peace and prosperity once again,” Mrs. Clinton said in a statement.

For Democrats inside the convention center in Denver, as well as the television audience at home, it could create some interesting moments. After the state-by-state roll is tallied, Mrs. Clinton is expected to turn over her cache of delegates to Senator Barack Obama.

So how will Mrs. Clinton, who is a superdelegate herself, vote? Associates say she will throw her lot behind Mr. Obama and ask her supporters to follow suit. To see if it unfolds as the Obama campaign hopes – free of acrimony – tune in on Wednesday, Aug. 27
I guess this makes some sort of sense, but in my mind I see it as another way for her to be an attention whore. I feel she's still trying to say, "Look at me! Look at me!"

It almost feels like having to have a birthday cake for someone who's birthday it is, only to have they hand it to you when it comes time to blow out the candles.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 11:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
It's a saving face maneuver, and I have no real problem with it. She's a smart lady, and I hope she continues to serve the public.
Willravel is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
I think the move is more about trying to get butthurt Hillary supporters to finally support Obama.
kutulu is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 02:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
This is the Clintons looking to outmanouver Obama. They are looking to make him look weak so the Republicans will win the election and Hillary can run in four year's time.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
pig
pigglet pigglet
 
pig's Avatar
 
Location: Locash
Jesus - what a trainwreck. Following on charlatan's post, I can imagine the following: Clinton gets respectable support, but eventually loses the nomination at the convention. Democrats hail the "democratic" policies of their party. Doubts are allowed to creep into the minds of independent voters, and Obama loses the election to McCain. He's "black," and "liberal," and a number of people say they will vote for him. However, at the polls they just can't pull the lever - despite all the hoopla about "anything but Bush." McCain is an Army man, and after all we're involved in serious military conflict. 2012 rolls around - things aren't substantially "better" than they are now - and Hillary is able to remind Democrat voters that she *almost* won in 2008 - only the controversy over Florida and Michigan surfaced...she should have won...afterall. No one likes old 75 year old "needs to go to Florida" McCain...she did bow out "graciously" at the end...

So I can see that angle. Frankly, this election process for the Democrat nomination has been one complete pile of shit, in my opinion. After Obama seemingly won the nomination, it seemed for a while that it might have been decided. The decision by the Clinton Campaign to "suspened" her campaign, instead of ending it, spoke volumes to me. I wasn't sure if she was holding out for a VP nod, or simply trying to keep getting $$$ to pay off her campaign debts. Frankly, I'm still not convinced. This may be her way to force a VP spot on the ticket. If she looks to get respectable support at the convention, Obama may be compelled to add her to the ticket. It would then help to shore up the consensus of the Democrat party - as much as it could be shored up - and head off a potential 2012 move against him if he looses in 2008. How could she run against the sitting President in 2012, assuming with her support and the lack of ensuing party dissension he can win in 2008?

If this plays out, she will exercise the power of Cheaney, as developed under Bush, and I would suspect between her and former President Bill Clinton, they will have a significant influence on national policy. I'm not necessarily saying that's a bad thing - but between the Bush II and Obama presidencies, we could see a significant shift on the role of the VP in administrative decisions. If you follow the Bush template...VP is a pretty damn sweet place to be.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style

Last edited by pig; 08-14-2008 at 03:58 PM..
pig is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 07:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Now there are claims (from the Clinton camp and prominent supporters) that the "media" purposely didn't bring John Edward's current "improprieties" out to the forefront when they surfaced last fall... Edward's campaign essentially "robbing" Hilary of the primary win.

The implication is that the fix was in for Obama and that Hilary will demand the nomination to go to the floor for a vote. Who knows what deals are being made or what maneuvers are in store between now and the convention.

It ain't over 'til the pant-suit-lady sings.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 08:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Pickles
 
ObieX's Avatar
 
Location: Shirt and Pants (NJ)
Just sounds like a lot of QQing to me. Ya lost lady, get over it.
__________________
We Must Dissent.
ObieX is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 08:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Nonsense...to all of the above...IMO.

There has not been a Democratic Convention in my lifetime (other than 1968) when there was a second candidate with a substantial number (nearly 50%) of the pledged delegates. In the past 40 years, the leading candidate has gone into the convention with over 75-80% of the delegates and, in most years, the other candidates were included in the roll call vote as a courtesy.

It is simply the Democratic party letting the system play out to give some recognition to the Clinton delegates who represent 18+ million primary voters.....and they will have their 2-3 hours to wave their banners and dance in the aisles.

Clinton will then move to have the NY delegate polled last and announce that as a Super Delegate, she is voting for Obama and ask her delegates to join in a unanimous resolution....some wont, but they will be drowned out by the overwhelming majority who will.

And Obama will come off as being magnanimous for agreeing to the spectacle and Clinton will come off as a team player and preserve her future in the party.

At most, it will make for one night of marginally interesting drama at the convention.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 08-14-2008 at 08:35 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 08:59 PM   #9 (permalink)
Insane
 
Atreides88's Avatar
 
Location: The South.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pig View Post
McCain is an NAVY man, and after all we're involved in serious military conflict. . .
Fixed it for you. Other than to try to unify the Democratic base or to try make one last stand, I see no point in this. This will only hurt the Democrats. IMO, Hillary is unelectable. She has a reputation for being duplicitous and is too far left politically to win a major election.
__________________
"There is no need to suppose that human beings differ very much one from another: but it is true that the ones who come out on top are the ones who have been trained in the hardest school." -- Thucydides
Atreides88 is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 04:03 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i don't think the sporting-event of the campaign--which is different from the campaign itself, which is rather it's televised duplicate, which obeys an entirely different dynamic than the actually existing campaign even as it references the actually existing campaign to provide itself with motion by way of rotating contents---i dont think the sporting-event campaign has anything to do with anything except the needs of television to legitimate itself and the broader political context of which it is, to my ongoing horror, central, by providing the illusion of continuity for its own sake.

the convention probably needs to have a certain degree of drama to it so that the actually existing campaign can becomes intertwined for a while with the sporting-event duplicate campaign. without some kind of drama, the illusory campaign, built around the substitution of video images that enable a sense of "being-there" as over against "being-informed" (pace virilio), the closed-off self-referential pseudo-present of television-land will entirely swamp the actually existing campaign, as it has these past months.

it is within the context of the sporting-event campaign that illusions on the order of "hillary clinton is too far to the left" can have currency. people will vote for hair styles and manly cadences while the spectral "candidate" strides into or out of buildings.

so i'm rather hoping for theater for its own sake.
i have no particular expectations for or even interest in the content of that theater.

i would just prefer to be able to imagine that this election is going to be decided on the basis of something more substantial than what the reactionary televisual talking-head set tells you that you think.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 02:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
pig
pigglet pigglet
 
pig's Avatar
 
Location: Locash
damn it roach: don't go ruining my soap opera! I'm fairly certain that the decisions of Jason Priestly and Luke What's His Name not to appear on the new version of 90210, along with the dashing Ian Zierringing are closely tied into to key moves to add plot twists to this exciting installment. I'm fairly certain that I've seen an early script written on Big Chief tablets somewhere.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
pig is offline  
Old 08-20-2008, 09:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Necrosis's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu View Post
I think the move is more about trying to get butthurt Hillary supporters to finally support Obama.
Truth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan View Post
This is the Clintons looking to outmanouver Obama. They are looking to make him look weak so the Republicans will win the election and Hillary can run in four year's time.
Even more insightful truth. Hillary never does anything that does not benefit Hillary.
Necrosis is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
loquitur's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post

so i'm rather hoping for theater for its own sake.
That's pretty much what politics at the national level amounts to these days, anyway. So I think your hopes will be fulfilled, at least on this score.
loquitur is offline  
 

Tags
clinton, dnc, hillary, nomination, put


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360