Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2007, 09:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Let's talk about Mike Gravel

Wow. This guy blew me off my feet. For a first impression, I gotta say I'm sold. I've got some videos for those who don't know him and I've got some notes if you're interested.






Here is someone's commentary about this guy's standpoints. If I had to rewrite this, I would do away with the comparison and categorization (Libertarian, Democrat... whatever. I dont make my decisions based on what party endorses it.) but I am too lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErrorS
I'd just like to remind everyone that this guy is as much Democrat as Ron Paul is Republican.. forget his party lines, he has little in common with Democrats.

1. He's more fiscally conservative than Democrats, damn near Libertarian views on defense.
2. He's more socially liberal than Democrats(which is a shame... Clinton and her stupid anti-gaming bull), again, damn near Libertain views on social freedoms.
3. Because he still likes spending on a lot of social issues, he's not a Libertarian.

Not to say he's conservative fiscally, he's not going to kill welfare and pull all funding from schools.. but he will cut our budget on defense a huge amount, he will abolish the IRS and all income taxes and he will push to bring on a federal sales tax to take place of income tax.

Some key things he supports, in a list to make things easier for people. I just want to make sure people fully understand his views, being good on TV doesn't necessarily mean you agree with everything they do.
1. Kill the IRS, no more income tax, at all.
2. Bring on a Fair Tax (sales tax only)
3. Cut defense spending by a huge amount
4. Legalize most drugs
5. Pro-Gun
6. Pro-Choice
Sound familier?

Then again:

7. Universal healthcare
8. Has a social security plan where we simply 'invest it better', I'm not sure if it's privitization or not, I don't think it is.
9. Increase funding to schools and most other social programs, very Democrat in this area.
10. Isn't big on free market, is against big business screwing "the people" and "the government"

Mix a Democrat with a Libertarian and you get Mike Gravel. I find it intriguing, as do many others I'd assume. If Libertarians scare but you like some of their views, Gravel is your candidate.

Don't view this like I'm saying he's good or bad, I'm not, I did some research and I'm trying to share what I know, that's all.
So, some of this guy's ideas are quite radical, and that is going to scare a lot of people, but socially and politically I feel like this guy is exactly what I want from a President. When it comes down to financial stuff, I just have to say I don't know enough to have an opinion.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
As far as I'm concerned the only reason he was invited on was to try to make the candidates with a chance look moderate in the Democratic war movement.

He said it himself in the video, he was nominated to attend. He did not write himself in.

And how does he claim to filibuster the draft? The draft has ONLY been proposed by Democrats to stir up anti-war sentiment.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 05:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Seaver.. those talking points you mentioned took place 30 years ago.

Here's some more:

CNN removes Gravel from their next debate on the grounds that he isn't popular enough.
Quote:
Washington, D.C. March 19, 2007 Presidential candidate and former United States Senator Mike Gravel rejected a statement CNN, Hearst owned WMUR-TV and the Union Leader issued Friday, March 16th in justifying its censorship of Senator Gravel by excluding him from a planned debate of Presidential candidates. The Senator said,“This statement is woefully ignorant, void of sound judgment and Kafkaesque in its conclusion.” Gravel continued, “There are several points in the statement, the full text of which follows, that cannot go unchallenged. First, when the statement says that I have not demonstrated measurable public support, it reveals an abysmal ignorance of the dynamics of political campaigns that is truly hard to believe originated in such important media institutions. It is common knowledge that polling numbers at the outset of a campaign,ten months before the first of many state elections reflect little more than name recognition and are simply not measures of public support. This does not mean that other candidates do not have some public following but rather that such support has not been tested by the crucible of a long campaign in which these supporters are given a chance to assess other options. The only accurate measure of public support is election-day. Finally, for what it is worth,I have, in a recent Harris poll improved my standing from February to March and exceed, in one test, one of my rivals for the nomination who I believe has been invited to the New Hampshire debate”.

The Senator continued, “The statement said that there are literally dozens and dozens of declared presidential candidates. That is true but out of those dozens of candidates, how many are former United States Senators who have been given the stamp of legitimacy by the Democratic National Committee, SEIU, AFSCME, ABC, the Nevada Democratic Party, the Center for American Progress Action Fund etc? Only two, former Senator John Edwards and myself.

“Though this is not the only criteria for deciding the legitimacy of a candidate as other aspirants may have contributed distinguished public service as an appointed official or as an officer of an NGO or excelled as individual public figures such as Ralph Nader, the Reverend Jesse Jackson and the Reverend Al Sharpton making them eminently worthy, it is one indisputable criteria for defining a legitimate candidate.”

The Senator continued, “The statement confirmed that I had not received an invitation but said that I nor anyone else has been excluded from the debate. It went on to say that if I meet their criteria between now and the debate, I will be invited. What was Orwellian in my not meeting certain criteria which the media organizations would not divulge becomes Kafkaesque when I am now told that I have not been excluded and can still be invited if Imeet this mysterious criteria. CNN, WMUR-TVand the Union Leader sent out invitations weeks ago. I did not receive one. I am told I have not demonstrated measurable public support, which, besides being a galactic misunderstanding of polling numbers ten months before an election is also a self-fulfilling prophecy since being included in the debate would provide me and any other candidate who may have not been invited an important opportunity to secure such public support.”

Senator Gravel concluded, “CNN, Hearst’s WMUR-TV and the Union Leader have been important sources of news for their listeners and readers. Why they want to deprive their audiences of differing political voices that aspire to the highest level of public service by exercising a form of insidious censorship, unbecoming a free society and a state with the motto 'Live Free Or Die' is a mystery.”

Mike Gravel, a resident of Virginia, is a former two-term Senator from Alaska with a distinguished record that includes successfully ending the military draft with a five-month filibuster, releasing the Pentagon Papers risking both prosecution and jail, playing the leading role in making the Alaska pipeline a reality, and ending nuclear testing in Alaska. He is the driving force and author of the National Initiative for Democracy, a proposal to bring the ballot initiative lawmaking process––already proven in many states as an effective and necessary check on unresponsive representative government––to the Federal level.


STATEMENT BY CNN, WMUR-TV AND THE UNION LEADER
The three debate partners, closely following Federal Election Commission guidelines, established objective criteria to determine who we invite to the debates. Because there are literally dozens and dozens of declared presidential candidates, most of whom we have never heard of, we have to have a method of determining who is invited. Our criteria simply identifies candidates that have measurable public support for their campaign. Because Mike Gravel has not demonstrated measurable public support for his campaign to date, he has not received an invitation. But we have not excluded him (or anyone) from the debate. If he meets our criteria between now and the debate, he will certainly get an invitation.
I bolded the summary of what this guy is about.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]

Last edited by Halx; 04-29-2007 at 06:02 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Halx is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 09:27 AM   #4 (permalink)
Addict
 
hiredgun's Avatar
 
And.... that's that. Does he have any shot if he won't be in the next debate?
hiredgun is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 09:57 AM   #5 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Following Gravel's five whole minutes on NBC's "Debate" ("Sound Bites" would be more accurate), there has been immense interest in him and his policies. He has been showing up on numerous talk shows, both radio and tv, and I suspect we'll see more of him. I loved how he shamed the current pack of Dems, but I don't see him pulling off the nomination.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 10:39 AM   #6 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
He's got a great passion that, when held up against Hillary and Obama, makes them look so fake and plastic. He's very animated and captivating. I'd like to think that he has a chance.

As Elphaba said, he's been given a lot more publicity lately so CNN (as stated) might extend the invitation to him after all.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 11:02 AM   #7 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Don't confuse yelling with passion. I strongly suspect he's not dissimilar from every other practiced politician you've ever seen.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 11:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Except that his policies make sense?
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:15 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halx
Except that his policies make sense?
"fair tax"?, "direct democracy"? No thank you....great ideas in mostly rural and white Alaska, and very popular among WASP males in red states.

You've spent time in the Bronx. With the current, but hobbled by Bush tax cuts, progressive tax and inheritance tax structure, the wealthiest ten percent still own more than 70 percent of total US assets. Do you think that the "fair tax" would distribute to the bottom 50 percent of the US population, more of the 2-1/2 percent of the total US wealth that they manage to own?

Do you think that "direct democracy" would strengthen minority representation in our government? Why do you think so many white. affluent, conservatives back "fair tax" and "direct democracy"? They are confident that they will have more money and more political power, as a result.

I'm not saying that Gravel is fronting for WASP males. I think that he is sincere and is direct and has integrity. I think that his policies are misguided, though. The poor and under represented do not need more policies that would make them poorer and less represented....IMO.
host is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Video 1:
1) The war is wrong.
He clearly stands alone on this issue.
2) Bush will veto stuff and we have to figure out how to get around him.
I'm sure Pelosi hasn't thought of that.
3) The people I'm running against scare me.
Maybe he needs a nap?
4) "There will be no preemptive wars with nuclear devices."
Wow! What a decisive and difficult decision! He's sure out on a limb there!
5) Joe is arrogant.
At least Joe isn't screaming at people...
6) We should get out of Iraq.
Again, a fascinating new strategy that no one has thought of.
7) I'm old and they're young.
Indeed...
8) We spend too much on defense.
Something that most of the candidates would agree on.
9) "We are 'mischaracterizing' terrorism."
More new insight into what's left of the liberal news media has been reporting on since 2001.
10) The sanctions were wrong.
Again, is this something anyone is going to disagree with?

I just don't see how Gravel stands out except for his decibel level.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 01:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
He stands out because while his ideas are nothing new, he's the only candidate actually stating a clear standpoint on them and a very specific means of achieving his goals.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]

Last edited by Halx; 04-29-2007 at 01:25 PM..
Halx is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 02:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Hal, he is one of the last Big 'D' Democrats, and they are an endangered species. There is nothing that he wants to do than can be done without compromise with both dems and reps. That wasn't the case when he last held office and he doesn't acknowledge that what he proposes now is not as easily done as it once was.

I like his grit, but I prefer bipartisan cooperation to one-party rule under either party.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 05:24 PM   #13 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Maybe it's just the idealist in me that enjoys HIS idealism. I'm not above giving my support to a dream that things could be better.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 07:16 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
I like Gravel, but one person's idealist is another persons ideologue.

There's a place for folks like Gravel in the Senate, but I dont want him in the White House.

IMO, the country is too diverse politically for an idealist/ideologue. Things will only be better if the president is a consensus builder, something seriously lacking in our current leader and a leadership quality I dont see in Gravel either.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 08:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I am a left leaning independent and he came off as a crazy man in the debates. He will never get the nomination.
Rekna is offline  
Old 04-30-2007, 05:26 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
I'm a libertarian so I really like the first few points you posted, but disagree with his social programs. I really do appreciate his candidness though. I think my favorites right now in order would be Ron Paul then probably Mike Gravel.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
 

Tags
gravel, mike, talk

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360