03-29-2007, 01:09 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: chicago, il
|
my art photography. critique strongly appreciated!
in portugal:
in costa rica: in the dominican republic: at home: please critique these, it would be greatly appreciated! Last edited by yelizaveta; 03-29-2007 at 01:11 PM.. Reason: more aesthetically pleasing arrangement |
03-29-2007, 01:44 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Wow, I really like the black and white Costa Rican picture! How did you get that effect with the water? I can't really tell if it was naturally draining from somewhere, but it definitely works very well.
On the Portuguese pictures, I would spend some time doing some cropping on all of them. On the orange picture especially, I think you could end up with something more interesting by limiting the scope of the activity. I'd also crop it a little tighter on the tree in the last one and maybe try to eliminate as much of the lake as possible. But that's me.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
03-29-2007, 01:55 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
I love that black and white one!
I have to agree with The_Jazz on the pictures from Portugal. However, I think the last one's fine. However, if you do wind up cropping that one, I recommend cropping out either side of the lake.
__________________
I still wave at the dots on the shore And I still beat my head against the door I still rage and wage my little war I'm a shade and easy to ignore |
03-29-2007, 02:07 PM | #4 (permalink) | |
Upright
Location: chicago, il
|
Quote:
That was actually during a thunderstorm in costa rica, and it's just water pouring off tree leaves. That storm was such a drencher, it felt like someone had tipped over a cosmic bucket onto costa rica more than like a shower! |
|
03-29-2007, 06:53 PM | #7 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Hi, yelizaveta. Love your pictures!
It took me a little while to get used to cropping pictures and I still know next to nothing about photoshop. And I still am not a fan of overcropping pictures, even though I've done it a few times lately with some of my pics...really out of frustration more than anything else. But I try to keep it at a minimum when possible. Like take your first photo for instance (which I like very much for its lines and subject matter!) - the only thing I would crop from that photo is the little bit of yellow window frame on the right edge (with maybe just a touch of the wall - a 1/2 inch or so) in order to make the position of the dog in the frame a little off center. Does that make any sense? But otherwise, I think it's a very personal thing and you should just play around with them and make them suit your own tastes. It's all for fun! And you seem to have a penchant for big skies. So do I. Welcome to TFP, by the way.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
03-29-2007, 07:17 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: chicago, il
|
thanks mixedmedia, i am also a bit reluctant to crop, although i do play around with photoshop sometimes; definitely not enough to be called an advanced user.
also, i never had noticed i liked big skies, but now that you pointed it out, i thought back through my photos and realized that i indeed do like big skies! it's interesting that that never registered with me before! |
03-30-2007, 06:22 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
Quote:
I agree with Mixedmedia about the dog picture-crop off the yellow since it's not really doing anything for the shot. That's a good picture to fool with in PS; You can crop just the dog, blur the woman more, have some fun with it. The oranges picture is an excellent set-up; the only thing I would say about it is that it's too equally divided into thirds-try taking just a tiny bit off the sky or oranges, see if that changes things. Nice work!
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em. |
|
03-30-2007, 12:46 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Upright
Location: chicago, il
|
Quote:
|
|
04-04-2007, 07:55 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Colorado
|
I suck at critiquing, so I will just say how I would have changed it if I shot it. Gonna sound kind of harsh probably.
1st shot I would have used a wider lens to get the window and full door, or narrower and changed the composition in order to eliminate the window, put the dog higher in frame (get his back foot in frame), and get him out of the center of the frame. Shot 2 doesn't do much for me. Fill flashed falling apart wall. Would have underexposed the shot and post processed it to add drama because, and I mean no offense, it seems quite boring. Shot 3 I would have raised the camera, lowered the angle. Less sky, more buildings. Straightened the horizion in photoshop. Shot 4 I would have found a better angle to show whats going on. As it stands, I feel it almost looks like the rope and such was an accident in capturing a fairly boring (due to lighting) landscape. Shot 5. Interesting idea. Dunno how I would have changed it. Shot 6 is fighting with itself. Whats the focus? Is it suppose to be the sky, or the trees? Its either got too much foreground or not enough foreground... not sure what you were going for. Last shot. Different angle, remove subject from frame center. Probably tried to get much closer to the subject. |
Tags |
appreciated, art, critique, photography, strongly |
|
|