Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2005, 11:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
Here's another one for ya... grr... marx

I sort of understand what Marx is saying in this small paragraph but the reasons behind it completely stump me.

"As individuals express their life, so they are. What they are, therefore, coincides with their production, both with what they produce and with how they produce. The nature of individuals thus depends on the material conditions determining their production."

Sure, we can say that what people produce and how they do so defines their life... but WHY? why would we say that? I think that the first sentence is throwing me off. what do you guys think?
__________________
"A dead Lois?!?" - Stewie
"Does this look like a Q to you? ... How 'bout now?" - Quagmire
ehh19 is offline  
Old 11-14-2005, 12:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
He's trying to describe the context, the groundwork for whatever he's about to say next. He's making the point that an 'individual' is not some abstract thing, but something that 'does' something. Something that 'produces' something. And if we are going to use this definition of the individual as a producer, then it is important to consider the environment around them that will enable or hinder the individuals ability to produce.

Why would we say that? Well we might be about to try and explain a new theory about organising people into a more productive system. And in doing so, he might be getting all the ground rules and assumptions defined and clarified and out the way, before we got into the real meat of the thing.

Like Euclid carefully defining what a point is, then a line, and then a right angle etc - before going on to create a full theory of geometry. Marx is defining a person in terms of what they can produce before expounding on his theories (whatever they may be?!) on the various socio-political systems in which these people operate.
nezmot is offline  
Old 11-14-2005, 02:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
I think it was Sartre who said something along the lines of 'for an object, essence precedes existence; for man existence precedes essence'. You can have a blueprint, a plan, (or, for Plato, a 'form') of an object and know what its purpose is before it even exists. Man, on the other hand, comes into the world and then creates/defines/produces himself through his actions.
I didn't know Marx had said this. It's an interesting add-on that he theorizes that man produces himself as a result of his environment. You can see where his argument is going - control the environment and you control the man. Neat.
Furlicker is offline  
Old 11-14-2005, 02:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
I produce things from wood, so I am a carpenter... I make music so I am a musician... I bake bread so I am a baker... I sit and watch tv all day so I am a couch potato...
Furlicker is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tilted
 
I'd just like to add that Marx was of course a materialst and a statement like this is very near to core of his philosophy. To me it seems quite obvious that we are defined by our daily business and environment, so I don't really see your problem with this line of thinking...
harry is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 02:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Comedian
 
BigBen's Avatar
 
Location: Use the search button
Marx was setting up the argument to refute what Smith and Ricardo had postulated for so long: Labour was just another factor in production. Land, Labour and Capital.

Marx had some revolutionary thoughts on Labour, and the value of that labour. It did not coincide with the standard economic thought at the time. He therefore set up his theory very carefully, when talking about the nature of production, and man's place in the economy.
__________________
3.141592654
Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis.
BigBen is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 10:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Twitterpated
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
Marx believed quite strongly that material goods and economy are the infrastructure of society, and all of society relies upon and revolves around the production of materials for our survival. Hence, the individual finds a great amount of importance personally in what they do make, how they make it, et cetera.

You have to look at what Marx says from a social rather than personal point of view. He was most assuredly a more "macro" theorist, in that he focused on the larger society and its effects on people, rather than vice versa.
__________________
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato
Suave is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
I haven't read Marx in I don't know how long, and without context I'll have some fun with this.

"As individuals express their life, so they are. What they are, therefore, coincides with their production, both with what they produce and with how they produce. The nature of individuals thus depends on the material conditions determining their production."

As individuals express their life, so they are.

You are what you do.

What they are, therefore, coincides with their production both with what they produce and with how they produce.

You are what you make/work on.

The nature of individuals thus depends on the material conditions determining their production.

What you are is dependent on your work enviroment.

Sounds like he is going into the plight of the workers here, or is still going on, as again I have this out of context. Since I do not define myself by my work I find it a false concept, at least for me.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:35 PM   #9 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furlicker
I think it was Sartre who said something along the lines of 'for an object, essence precedes existence; for man existence precedes essence'. You can have a blueprint, a plan, (or, for Plato, a 'form') of an object and know what its purpose is before it even exists. Man, on the other hand, comes into the world and then creates/defines/produces himself through his actions.
I didn't know Marx had said this. It's an interesting add-on that he theorizes that man produces himself as a result of his environment. You can see where his argument is going - control the environment and you control the man. Neat.
I'm not sure he's taking it that far... for you will note it's an add on, as an influential factor, for enviroment does not force actions only influence them...
TheObserver is offline  
Old 12-31-2005, 02:40 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I haven't read Marx in I don't know how long, and without context I'll have some fun with this.

"As individuals express their life, so they are. What they are, therefore, coincides with their production, both with what they produce and with how they produce. The nature of individuals thus depends on the material conditions determining their production."

As individuals express their life, so they are.

You are what you do.

What they are, therefore, coincides with their production both with what they produce and with how they produce.

You are what you make/work on.

The nature of individuals thus depends on the material conditions determining their production.
and
What you are is dependent on your work enviroment.

Sounds like he is going into the plight of the workers here, or is still going on, as again I have this out of context. Since I do not define myself by my work I find it a false concept, at least for me.

To marx, to "produce" isn't always the same as to "work" as people understand it today. These days, we have a concept that a human's life is basically split in half: "work" & "leisure". Marx didn't see production as a function of "work" but of how humans were fulfilled.

In another thread, you stated, "What you do is pick your government with what works best with human nature. Capitalism does this, and no one will claim its perfect, and its very unfair, but it works well and affords us the most freedom." -- http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...1&postcount=49

I think this sentence implies that you see a goodness of fit between your concept of your self your economic context:capitalism. You take the things you feel good about in capitalism and claim it meshes with your human nature--the essential characteristics of what constitutes your self, or a person for that matter. It appears, from that sentence, that you actually are defining yourself according to your place in the economy.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
 

Tags
grr, marx

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360