Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2004, 06:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Houston
A question about Pi

So I'm sitting there thinking, Pi is an non-repeating, non-ending value. Now this must mean that we can't tell it's exact value, so what is it? Does it mean that it really doesn't have an exact value? Or to further the idea more, is Pi only an idea or a tool that we created, and the thing doesn't even exist on a number line(although we know it's approximate value)?
I really hope it makes sense. Looking forward for answers.
BlitzkriegKommt is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: California
Pi is an irrational number, like many other irrational number (infinitely many, in fact), like square root of 2, square root of any non-square number (I think), and e, etc.

Irrational numbers do exist on the number line, so Pi would also be on the number line. Now you wouldn't be able to draw it at its exact location, but you wouldn't be able to draw the number 1 at its exact location either, because there's always inaccuracy in physical measurements (for example, you might use a ruler and draw number 1 at one inch, but then the ruler's lines have some thickness, so if you want to get even more accurate, you'll have to use an even smaller ruler, but that would also have some inaccuracy, and so on...)
joeshoe is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Houston
I understand what you are saying, but the question isn't primarily about pi being on numberline, its about pi being a theory just like infinity. Since we can't tell what pi exactly is.
BlitzkriegKommt is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to it's diameter. However it's value is irrational. It is not an idea or tool that we created (we found/discovered it). But in 1897 the Indiana state legislature tried to pass a bill making pi equal to 3.2, 3.23 or 4, you could take your pick, LOL. I have often thought that if there is an intelligent designer of our universe that useful numbers like pi would be rational.
flstf is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Wales, UK, Europe, Earth, Milky Way, Universe
Theoretically you could create a whole number base, based on pi. Where pi is 1. So the ratio of the cirumference of a circle to its diameter (or whatever pi is) would always be 1. Numbers, and therefore mathematics ares tools created by humans. Sometimes the universe likes to reveal how complicated it really is and get us all philosophical about concepts that we cant reinvent without evolving massively more intelligent brains to understand the universe better so we're just stuck with them.
__________________
There are only two industries that refer to their customers as "users". - Edward Tufte
welshbyte is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 07:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf
Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to it's diameter. However it's value is irrational. It is not an idea or tool that we created (we found/discovered it).
The concept of a circle is an abstract idealization. Assuming that physical lengths have meaning to arbitrary precision is also an abstraction. Pi is a well-defined logical construct, but we created it. The "physical definition" of pi is only an approximation to the mathematical one (although a very good one).
stingc is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 09:59 PM   #7 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Houston
Quote:
Originally Posted by welshbyte
Theoretically you could create a whole number base, based on pi. Where pi is 1. So the ratio of the cirumference of a circle to its diameter (or whatever pi is) would always be 1. Numbers, and therefore mathematics ares tools created by humans. Sometimes the universe likes to reveal how complicated it really is and get us all philosophical about concepts that we cant reinvent without evolving massively more intelligent brains to understand the universe better so we're just stuck with them.
That was very well explained, comendable job.
BlitzkriegKommt is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 04:06 AM   #8 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by stingc
The concept of a circle is an abstract idealization. Assuming that physical lengths have meaning to arbitrary precision is also an abstraction. Pi is a well-defined logical construct, but we created it. The "physical definition" of pi is only an approximation to the mathematical one (although a very good one).
I am not very well schooled in math, but isn't the ratio of a circle's circumference to it's diameter something that just is? And the logical construct comes about when we try to assign a number to it?

In simple terms (for my benefit, LOL) if we take a wagon wheel and place a mark on it's outer rim then roll it in the sand until we come to that mark again we will have a line that equals the wheel's circumference. Then if we lay the wheel down on its side (diameter) over the line, it will take up a certain amount of the line's length. The long line (circumference) and the short line (diameter) will always be the same relation to each other (ratio) no matter what size wheel we use.

Isn't this more like a discovery than a logical construct at least until we try to assign an exact number to it?
flstf is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 10:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf
Isn't this more like a discovery than a logical construct at least until we try to assign an exact number to it?
Yes, it certainly has a physical meaning. What I meant is that when you start talking about pi being irrational, then you're not really referring to physical measurements anymore. It is an abstraction, although one which is motivated by experiments like the one you mention with a wagon wheel.

To be a little more precise in what I'm talking about, we know that geometry is not quite Euclidean. Different circles would have different effective values of pi (although they can be related to the usual pi given some extra parameters). More seriously, it seems that distances cannot take on continuous values. Space itself probably becomes discretized in a sense below a certain scale. In all of this, it is still useful to keep the mathematical definition of pi, but it loses some of its simple physical interpretation.
stingc is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 11:01 AM   #10 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Pi is as real as any other number. Just because it cannot be written down as a decimal does not change this. I don't know what you mean when you say we cannot know it's value. You can draw a line of length pi quite easily. But perhaps your objection is that it could never be exactly pi. Certainly, that's true. But it could never be exactly two either.

Also, pi is not a "social construct". There is a reason why were are beaming the encoded value of pi, and not the complete works of shakespeare, out into space to alert any extra-terrestrial life of our presence.

EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by stingc
Different circles would have different effective values of pi
I know what you are saying, but just so as not to confuse anyone:

pi has only one value. Non Eucleudian cirlces do not have a circumference/diameter ratio of pi.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 11:34 AM   #11 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
CSflim, there are just as many imaginary numbers as real numbers
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche
asaris is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:45 PM   #12 (permalink)
Psycho
 
1010011010's Avatar
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
CSfilm, I don't think I've ever seen it stated that it's the circumference:diameter ratio of a circle on a flat plane. Not saying this isn't the understood definition of 3.14159..., but that technically you could define a different surface, pick a point, draw a circle around it, and calculate different values of pi.

Why is it that the sum of 4/{n[(-1)^(1+n)]} approaches pi (of the 3.14159... variety)?
This is the 4/1-4/2+4/3-4/4+4/5-4/6+4/7... series. It doesn't seem like there's any reason that it should.
__________________
Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
1010011010 is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:55 PM   #13 (permalink)
Upright
 
Stolen from: http://highpi.4t.com/about.html

Odd Pi Facts


The world cacluation record currently is 1.241 trillion decimal places. If you lined up all of these digits in about font 14, it would reach from the Earth to the moon.
The world PC calculation record currently is 25 billion decimal places.
If you lined up one billion digits, they would stretch from Washington D.C. to Las Vegas.
If you take the third, sixth, and nineth digits, they are, respectivly, 1,2,3.
If you take the 100th, 200th, and 300th digits, they are, resectivly, 9,6,3.
The sequence 333 is found three times in the first 7,000 digits.
The sequence 666 is found six times in the first 7,000 digits.
Only 20 decimal digits are neccessary to calculate the circumfrance of the Earth down to a fraction of an inch.
Only 39 decimal digits are neccessary to calculate the circumfrance of the known universe down to the electron.
"Pi" is the sixteenth character of the Greek alphabet, and "p" is the sixteenth of ours.
If you "multiply" pi times "e" you get "pie".... (get it?)
Savannah, Georgia has a zip code of 31415.
__________________
F=MA
2.998*108ms-1
Ek = 1/2mv2
R D R R
Cryptic is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1010011010
Why is it that the sum of 4/{n[(-1)^(1+n)]} approaches pi (of the 3.14159... variety)?
This is the 4/1-4/2+4/3-4/4+4/5-4/6+4/7... series. It doesn't seem like there's any reason that it should.
Conditionally convergent series can be made to add up to different numbers depending on the sequence and the order of its terms. That there is one that adds up to pi shouldn't surprise you anymore than one that sums to two.
filtherton is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 06:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1010011010
CSfilm, I don't think I've ever seen it stated that it's the circumference:diameter ratio of a circle on a flat plane. Not saying this isn't the understood definition of 3.14159..., but that technically you could define a different surface, pick a point, draw a circle around it, and calculate different values of pi.
You can take any circle, and divide its circumference by its diameter. You get pi every time. A circle that doesn't do this isn't a circle by all modern definitions. If you can prove this wrong, you just broke math.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 10:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slavakion
You can take any circle, and divide its circumference by its diameter. You get pi every time. A circle that doesn't do this isn't a circle by all modern definitions. If you can prove this wrong, you just broke math.
Circles are usually defined by the 1 dimensional set of points equidistant from a center in a 2-dimensional space. If that space is a Euclidean plane, then circumference/diameter=pi. If it is not a plane, then you don't get pi.
stingc is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 09:07 AM   #17 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1010011010
CSfilm, I don't think I've ever seen it stated that it's the circumference:diameter ratio of a circle on a flat plane. Not saying this isn't the understood definition of 3.14159..., but that technically you could define a different surface, pick a point, draw a circle around it, and calculate different values of pi.
You can certainly define a different surface, pick a point, draw a circle around it, and divide the circumference by the diameter, and get a whole load of values, but these other values would not be pi.

Quote:
Why is it that the sum of 4/{n[(-1)^(1+n)]} approaches pi (of the 3.14159... variety)?
This is the 4/1-4/2+4/3-4/4+4/5-4/6+4/7... series. It doesn't seem like there's any reason that it should.
Because mathematics is beautiful.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 09:13 AM   #18 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by stingc
Circles are usually defined by the 1 dimensional set of points equidistant from a center in a 2-dimensional space. If that space is a Euclidean plane, then circumference/diameter=pi. If it is not a plane, then you don't get pi.
Well... wait. Are you trying to suggest we draw a circle on a curved surface? Maybe it's technically a circle (I'm not sure) but I wouldn't call it one. Circles are two-dimensional, and what I think you're suggesting is three-dimensional. I can't really stand my ground there, because I haven't done anything with 3-D points, vectors, etc. Only volumes of various solids.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 09:25 AM   #19 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cryptic
Stolen from: http://highpi.4t.com/about.html

Odd Pi Facts


The world cacluation record currently is 1.241 trillion decimal places. If you lined up all of these digits in about font 14, it would reach from the Earth to the moon.
The world PC calculation record currently is 25 billion decimal places.
If you lined up one billion digits, they would stretch from Washington D.C. to Las Vegas.
If you take the third, sixth, and nineth digits, they are, respectivly, 1,2,3.
If you take the 100th, 200th, and 300th digits, they are, resectivly, 9,6,3.
The sequence 333 is found three times in the first 7,000 digits.
The sequence 666 is found six times in the first 7,000 digits.
Only 20 decimal digits are neccessary to calculate the circumfrance of the Earth down to a fraction of an inch.
Only 39 decimal digits are neccessary to calculate the circumfrance of the known universe down to the electron.
"Pi" is the sixteenth character of the Greek alphabet, and "p" is the sixteenth of ours.
If you "multiply" pi times "e" you get "pie".... (get it?)
Savannah, Georgia has a zip code of 31415.

The millionth digit is one.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 09:29 AM   #20 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slavakion
Well... wait. Are you trying to suggest we draw a circle on a curved surface? Maybe it's technically a circle (I'm not sure) but I wouldn't call it one. Circles are two-dimensional, and what I think you're suggesting is three-dimensional. I can't really stand my ground there, because I haven't done anything with 3-D points, vectors, etc. Only volumes of various solids.
No, he's not talking about three dimensional geometry, he's talking about two dimensional geometry on a curved surface (e.g. drawing a map of the world on a globe: don't forget, we are talking about the surface of the globe which is 2D, not the actual globe itself, which is 3D). So they would be two-dimensional, just non-euclidean. They are still referred to as "circles", they just don't have the same properties as circles in a euclidean geometry (most pertinently, the fact that c/d does not equal pi).



EDIT:
From another page:
Is pi constant in relativity?
Quote:
Is pi constant in relativity?

Yes. Pi is a mathematical constant usually defined as the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter in Euclidean geometry. It can also be defined in other ways; for example, it can be defined using an infinite series:


pi/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - . . .

In general relativity, space and spacetime are non-Euclidean geometries. The ratio of the circumference to diameter of a circle in non-Euclidean geometry can be more or less than pi. For the types of non-Euclidean geometry used in physics the ratio is very nearly pi over small distances so we do not notice the difference in ordinary measurements. This does not mean that pi changes because our definition of pi specified Euclidean geometry, not physical geometry. No new theory or experiment in physics can change the value of mathematically defined constants.
(Emphasis added)
__________________

Last edited by CSflim; 11-20-2004 at 09:42 AM..
CSflim is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 10:46 AM   #21 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSflim
No, he's not talking about three dimensional geometry, he's talking about two dimensional geometry on a curved surface (e.g. drawing a map of the world on a globe: don't forget, we are talking about the surface of the globe which is 2D, not the actual globe itself, which is 3D). So they would be two-dimensional, just non-euclidean. They are still referred to as "circles", they just don't have the same properties as circles in a euclidean geometry (most pertinently, the fact that c/d does not equal pi).
Just to amplify this for those unfamiliar with non-Euclidean geometry, surfaces can be defined without embedding them in a higher dimensional space. A sphere for example is a 2-dimensional object. You can define what it means to do geometry on it without ever having to refer to an external space that it might (or might not) be sitting in. The distinction is subtle, but it turns out to be a useful one.
stingc is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 05:46 PM   #22 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSflim
No, he's not talking about three dimensional geometry, he's talking about two dimensional geometry on a curved surface (e.g. drawing a map of the world on a globe: don't forget, we are talking about the surface of the globe which is 2D, not the actual globe itself, which is 3D). So they would be two-dimensional, just non-euclidean. They are still referred to as "circles", they just don't have the same properties as circles in a euclidean geometry (most pertinently, the fact that c/d does not equal pi).
Oh... okay. *backs away*
Slavakion is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 07:43 PM   #23 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Perhaps Pi is rational and we'rethe irrational ones...
NegativeNine is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 12:18 AM   #24 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by NegativeNine
Perhaps Pi is rational and we'rethe irrational ones...
If I'm not mistaken I think pi does exist in Euclidean geometry (as just the ratio between c and d). It becomes irrational when we try to fit it's value into our existing numbering system (by definition within that system). As welshbyte said in an earlier post we could have designed a new numbering system around it and made pi = 1.
Someone let me know if I'm all wet, I think I am way over my head here, LOL.
flstf is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 05:41 AM   #25 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by NegativeNine
Perhaps Pi is rational and we'rethe irrational ones...

Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf
If I'm not mistaken I think pi does exist in Euclidean geometry (as just the ratio between c and d). It becomes irrational when we try to fit it's value into our existing numbering system (by definition within that system). As welshbyte said in an earlier post we could have designed a new numbering system around it and made pi = 1.
Someone let me know if I'm all wet, I think I am way over my head here, LOL.
Just to clarify for those who don't realise, in this context "rational" does not mean "logical" or "reasonable" but ratio-nal, as in to do with ratios. In other words an irrational number cannot be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers. Take a half: that can be expressed as 1/2. Or 0.66666... can be expressed as 2/3. Pi and other irrationals (e.g. Root 2) cannot be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers.
Now, it is important to realise that I have made no reference to any particular number system. Numbers have the property of rationality or irationality regardless of the number system that is used to express them.
So if you were to construct a number system with base pi (I have never seen non-whole number bases, but it is not immediately obvious why you could not do so), then you would have created a number system with an irational base and the symbol '1' would still refer to an irrational number.

Pi is always the same value, and that value is always irrational.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 10:07 AM   #26 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
http://3.141592653589793238462643383...974944592.com/
Zeraph is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 07:15 PM   #27 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Washington State
Wow, If I stare at that long enough the numbers kinda blur together and mix around... I wonder if I would find a pattern before I saw a proton decay between the screen and myself?
W4K3_U?_! is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 09:33 PM   #28 (permalink)
Sen
Insane
 
Sen's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSflim
Pi is always the same value, and that value is always irrational.
I think that about sums it up. I've heard no clearer explanation.
__________________
"I want to announce my presence with authority!"

"You want to what?"

"I want to announce my presence with authority!!"
Sen is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 02:45 AM   #29 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Furry's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Scroll down really fast and you get a "matrix" effect. Ack, my poor brain.
Furry is offline  
Old 11-24-2004, 08:38 PM   #30 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Salt Lake City
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSflim
Because mathematics is beautiful.
Yes it is!
belkins is offline  
Old 11-28-2004, 04:28 AM   #31 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Just got into town about an hour ago.
It doesn't do much to explain your question but, you should check out the movie 'Pi' (directed by Darren Aaranofsky). I'm sure it will further your interest with the number.
__________________
Dropping a barbell he points to the sky and says "The suns not yellow, It's chicken!"
MojoRisin is offline  
Old 11-28-2004, 10:15 AM   #32 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by wicked4182
It doesn't do much to explain your question but, you should check out the movie 'Pi' (directed by Darren Aaranofsky). I'm sure it will further your interest with the number.

Pi is a (very good) piece of fiction.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 11-28-2004, 10:47 AM   #33 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Stiltzkin's Avatar
 
If I knew how to derive Pi I could explain this better, but you can look at 1.5 is either 1.5 or 3/2, both meaning the exact same thing. 1.5 is no more or less exact than 3/2, and they are both infinitely precise. So if you look at the equation that derives Pi, that equation is the exact value of Pi, with infinite precision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlitzkriegKommt
is Pi only an idea
Yes it is. In fact, all of mathematics is only an idea. They're called axioms:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=axiom

EDIT: Read 1010011010's post. This is the exact value of Pi: 4/{n[(-1)^(1+n)]}
It doesn't look like you always dreamed it would, does it?
__________________
The most important thing in this world is love.

Last edited by Stiltzkin; 11-28-2004 at 10:51 AM..
Stiltzkin is offline  
Old 11-29-2004, 06:11 PM   #34 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Midland, Ontario, Canada
there are 906 occourances of 151 in the first million digits of pi, and 151 also happens to be the last 3 digits in the first million.
Bobbias is offline  
Old 12-01-2004, 06:10 PM   #35 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Ithaca, New York
I think one of the problems people have with the hole diameter/circumference thing is that they don't realize what a circle is.
A circle is not a wheel. A circle is not a ring.
A circle is a mathematically defined shape. When mathematians talk about circles, there are specific definitions that they apply.
Coincidentally, when you go build a wheel, that wheel is a pretty good approximation to a mathematical circle.
__________________
And if you say to me tomorrow, oh what fun it all would be.
Then what's to stop us, pretty baby. But What Is And What Should Never Be.
fckm is offline  
 

Tags
question

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360