Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2004, 06:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
Aborting when life at risk

Some people say abortion is ok if the mother is at serious risk. Do you agree that abortion is ok if the mother is at risk of a heavy side effect (not dying) of carrying the baby or only when it is a matter of life and death?

And even then, shouldn't they just go ahead and have the baby and put their trust in God?
RespectThat is offline  
Old 11-02-2004, 09:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
pow!
 
clavus's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal
I promised to forsake all others for my bride. So for me, the answer is simple. If anyone, even my own unborn fetus/child threatens my wife, they lose.
__________________
Ass, gas or grass. Nobody rides for free.
clavus is offline  
Old 11-02-2004, 09:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Twitterpated
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
Obviously it depends what the mother wants; some would rather die giving birth than have an abortion. I support the choice to have an abortion though, because the child has no social ties yet, and there would be a chance of a sort of "dark cloud" hanging over the child's head, should the mother die at birth (ie. YOU KILLED YOUR MOTHER kind of a thing).
Suave is offline  
Old 11-02-2004, 10:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
"and put their trust in God?" What is that supposed to mean? It's asinine, since anything that happens is "God's will" well then getting an abortion is trusting God too. Therefore that statement is meaningless, and annoying. Stop using it please.

"If anyone, even my own unborn fetus/child threatens my wife, they lose." I like that (not the threat of violence, just the compassion/love it seems I hear, it sounds like something I'd say), I wish you well in your marriage.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 07:02 AM   #5 (permalink)
whosoever
 
martinguerre's Avatar
 
Location: New England
Quote:
And even then, shouldn't they just go ahead and have the baby and put their trust in God?
"11- Give a sweet sacrifice, and a memorial of fine flour, and make a fat offering,
and then give place to the physician. *********
******* 12- For the Lord created him: and let him not depart from thee, for his works are necessary.
******* 13- For there is a time when thou must fall into their hands:
"

That's Sirach 38...

" Jesus responded, "The Scriptures also say, `Do not test the Lord your God.' "

Luke 4

We have not been given the miracles of modern medical treatment so that we might dispise them.
__________________
For God so loved creation, that God sent God's only Son that whosoever believed should not perish, but have everlasting life.

-John 3:16
martinguerre is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 08:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
Addict
 
Master_Shake's Avatar
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
"put their trust in God?"

Why not put her trust in the sun? It's just as likely to save her life as a non-existent invisible man. At least she can see the sun.
__________________
-------------
You know something, I don't think the sun even... exists... in this place. 'Cause I've been up for hours, and hours, and hours, and the night never ends here.
Master_Shake is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 04:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Psycho
 
superiorrain's Avatar
 
Location: London
I'd say got to agree with all of the people that have posted so far. Abortion if someone elses life is at risk is surely the only solution. How would you feel if you grew up knowing that your mother died just so she could give birth to you. It's different if it just happened. Self preservation is the ultimate human instinct.
__________________
"The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible." - Arthur C. Clarke
superiorrain is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 03:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
Upright
 
I figure if you can practically grow a baby in a test tube now. Women give birth to kids that are several months premature now. I say if you can save the kid, take it out and save the kid. But there's no reason to lose two lives when you can at least save one.
As long as you try to save the kid there shouldn't be any problems with removing it.

To go along with everyone else it would suck if every year on your birthday you had to go visit your mom's funeraly. Thats just a recipe for suicide.
solaron1 is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 04:03 AM   #9 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Alton, IL
I see no reason why the child's life is worth less than the mother's. Put me down for the child.
gondath is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 06:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeraph
"and put their trust in God?" What is that supposed to mean? It's asinine, since anything that happens is "God's will" well then getting an abortion is trusting God too. Therefore that statement is meaningless, and annoying. Stop using it please.
I'm just saying that some people say that, my sister for example. She got pregnant and had complications because of it. All the doctors told her she would most likely die if she went through and had the baby. Well, she is very religious and said that that would be impossible and that she knows God will look after her. She had the baby and didn't die. She is strongly opposed to abortion, even if it meant she could die.
RespectThat is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 09:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
I'm okay with abortion's legality when the life of the mother is at risk. Self-defense.

Opposed in all other circumstances.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 02:17 PM   #12 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
I think it should be the mother's choice. It's her body.
MSD is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 07:23 PM   #13 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gondath
I see no reason why the child's life is worth less than the mother's. Put me down for the child.
This doesn't make any sense; if they are both lives hold equal value how do we choose one over the other?
Mantus is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 10:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Alton, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mantus
This doesn't make any sense; if they are both lives hold equal value how do we choose one over the other?
It makes perfect sense. I never mentioned the mother's life being equal to the child's, for one. I suppose if you do consider them both equal, then make a random choice. Flip a coin or roll a die.
gondath is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 06:22 AM   #15 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gondath
It makes perfect sense. I never mentioned the mother's life being equal to the child's, for one.
Alright, then how we determine that the child's life is worth more?
Mantus is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 06:50 AM   #16 (permalink)
Addict
 
Master_Shake's Avatar
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
It probably depends on what you mean by "worth."
<sarcasm>

Economic value:
The fetus is probably worth some money in that its stem cells could be harvested and sold. I don't know the going rate for this, but I heard somewhere that it's around $200-300 for the whole thing.

The mother's body may be worth more. If selling organs were permitted, all her organs could certainly be sold off for several times the value of the fetus' undeveloped tissue. I mean if you harvested everything you could, lungs, heart, corneas, marrow, kidneys, liver, you could probably get quite a bit of money.

Productivity value:
Assuming the mother is an average woman of child bearing age with rudimentary education, she could probably find work somewhere, if nothing else then as a prostitute.

The fetus requires at least a dozen years of care and investment before it can be relied on to produce or contribute anything.

Moral value:
Well, any woman contemplating abortion is clearly an evil sinner, probably not even married. She probably deserves to die for being such a heathen.

However, the fetus is steeped in that original sin stuff isn't it? Since the mother would die, the child would be raised an orphan, and you know how those kids turn out. Perhaps it would be best if both the child and mother died during the delivery?
</sarcasm>
__________________
-------------
You know something, I don't think the sun even... exists... in this place. 'Cause I've been up for hours, and hours, and hours, and the night never ends here.
Master_Shake is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 08:34 AM   #17 (permalink)
Banned from being Banned
 
Location: Donkey
It's the mother's choice. If she wants to do it for any reason, or no reason at all, have at it!
__________________
I love lamp.
Stompy is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 09:14 AM   #18 (permalink)
zen_tom
Guest
 
Ask the mother what she wants, ask the foetus what it wants. Whoever provides the best answer gets to choose. Mother might well choose to die (my Great-Granny for one did) on behalf of her unborn child.

Whatever anyone decides, there is always going to be something in the Bible that someone interprets as someone doing something wrong (whether it's self harm, suicide or abortion) - In fact, this isn't biblical, is a problem with the concept of morality as a whole - as soon as morals (or rights, or laws, or whatever you want to call them) start to overlap, it looks to me like proof that they were poorly thought-up in the first place.

Can't anyone understand that there is no such thing as right and wrong?

Why not look at the situation compassionately, this poor mother-to-be has to make the most difficult decision of her entire life, one that will effect everyone she knows, and here are you guys getting ready to point the finger and say she did something morally wrong!

For f@cksakes - this sort of discussion really pisses me off.
 
Old 11-05-2004, 09:39 AM   #19 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by zen_tom
Can't anyone understand that there is no such thing as right and wrong?

Why not look at the situation compassionately, this poor mother-to-be has to make the most difficult decision of her entire life, one that will effect everyone she knows, and here are you guys getting ready to point the finger and say she did something morally wrong!
Is there something...wrong with pointing the finger?

Nah, couldn't be. No such thing as right and wrong.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 10:10 AM   #20 (permalink)
zen_tom
Guest
 
Doh! OK, yes you spotted my deliberate mistake - the difference (if there is one) is that we are reasonably comfortable people typing our thoughts about distant topics on screen, while our mother-to/not-to be is going to have to choose between her own life and that of her unborn child.
 
Old 11-05-2004, 10:15 AM   #21 (permalink)
zen_tom
Guest
 
and after thinking about it for a moment. Right and wrong, being morally charged words are different from my point which is to illustrate the lack of compassion within this discussion.

The fact that it annoys me doesn't make it right or wrong, but it does annoy me.
 
Old 11-05-2004, 10:17 AM   #22 (permalink)
zen_tom
Guest
 
and it seems to show a lack of understanding and a certain level of missing the point. Both of which are certainly not moral issues at all, but are instead matters of correctness when considering questions such as these.
 
Old 11-05-2004, 10:32 AM   #23 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Heart o' Texas
In some situations, if the mother dies, so does the fetus, Obviously, abortion is the answer here. Ectopic pregnancies are a great example of that. if you do no abort the fetus,the mother WILL DIE, and the fetus will too. Here, no one has a choice. the fetus must be terminated. If the choice, however is a viable fetus, or mother then, that is something she should have the right to decide. I personally cant tell her what to do, even though I feel that protection of the mother is the ultimate goal.
__________________
Bill

Ctrl-Alt-Del - works for me!
bill96ab is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 03:32 PM   #24 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Alton, IL
I'm curious to see why almost all people here value the life of the mother over the child. Is social conditioning at work here?
gondath is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 04:26 PM   #25 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by zen_tom
and it seems to show a lack of understanding and a certain level of missing the point. Both of which are certainly not moral issues at all, but are instead matters of correctness when considering questions such as these.
I disagree on both points...but it doesn't matter. Because there's nothing wrong with lacking understanding, there's nothing wrong with missing the point, there's nothing wrong with persisting in incorrect beliefs, and oh, there's nothing wrong with forcing a pregnant woman to carry her child to term. Right and wrong are just words, after all.

Maybe those things annoy you. Oh well. Modern country music annoys me, but it ain't gonna go away.

My overall point being this: invoking moral relativism in an attempt to argue against restricting or banning abortion doesn't work. Even if moral relativism is true.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 04:26 PM   #26 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by gondath
I'm curious to see why almost all people here value the life of the mother over the child. Is social conditioning at work here?
fwiw, I don't.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 05:54 PM   #27 (permalink)
zen_tom
Guest
 
FoolThemAll, I'm not invoking moral relativism (but I do happen to believe, as you appear to, that it's true), and I'm not arguing for or against restricting or banning abortion - what I am trying to point out is that it is an issue to be dealt with compassion, and attempts at rationally determining the value of one life over another, in an attempt to deem who should survive and who should die in order to suit some moral code appear to lack that compassion.

But I guess I've right-and-wronged my way out of the argument already now haven't I?

Let me try and re-phrase my point:
No matter what decision anyone takes, it's going to be a horrible, terrible, difficult decision to make, and the results are going to be long, and far reaching. Trying to further compound the issue by imposing a tag of right or wrong really isn't going to help anyone. Further, it will make the decision harder, more painfull and more difficult to make. It appears to me to serve no purpose other than to inflict pain on already stricken individuals.
 
Old 11-05-2004, 08:48 PM   #28 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Actually, I don't believe in moral relativism. Sorry if I caused confusion, I was simply approaching it from a moral relativism perspective for purposes of the debate.

Strictly speaking, I agree. Merely attaching 'wrong' to the act doesn't do much, outside of possibly effective peer pressure. Judgment without the subsequent offer of a helping hand is rarely helpful. Words need action to back them up. For my view, pro-life counseling services, personal support, and voting that reflects a anti-abortion outlook all fit the bill.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:01 PM   #29 (permalink)
TIO
Addict
 
TIO's Avatar
 
Location: The Land Down Under
All value of life aside: Isn't there a self-defense issue here? FoolThemAll brought it up, but didn't expand on it.
If a man was coming at you with a knife with the intention of killing you, would you be justified in shooting him (dead if need be)?
So if the person who is going to kill you happens to be living inside your belly, aren't you still justified? Even if it's less immediate, the death threat may be no less certain.
__________________
Strewth
TIO is offline  
 

Tags
aborting, life, risk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360