08-25-2009, 10:39 AM | #1 (permalink) |
WHEEEE! Whee! Whee! WHEEEE!
Location: Southern Illinois
|
Do we make the media, or does the media make us?
Is the media a reflection of society, or is society shaped by the media? I used to think it was the former; now I'm starting to believe it's the latter. We spoon feed people at an early age vapid pop stars and reality shows; is it just a coincidence that people worry about civilization going down the shitter?
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT! |
08-25-2009, 07:55 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: M[ass]achusetts
|
Quote:
This question should really be categorized under life imitates art or art imitates life, because they are one and the same, except that, arguably, the media is trash, and not art. Since the modern media's primary concern is to get us to buy stuff, does that mean that we, in reflection, are automatons who purchase (ie purchasing machines)?
__________________
In the end we are but wisps |
|
08-26-2009, 03:45 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Eponymous
Location: Central Central Florida
|
Where's ARTelevision? There are some mighty interesting threads and posts here and in other threads.
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/hall-fa...d-control.html
__________________
We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess. Mark Twain Last edited by SecretMethod70; 08-27-2009 at 11:56 AM.. Reason: fixed |
08-26-2009, 08:28 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
much of it is learned...
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
10-02-2009, 12:42 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: My head.
|
I have been thinking about this ... and I have to say, WE make the media. It begins with us. People say that TV has progressively gotten worse but has it really? Lowest common denominator, I say.
If the Romans truly did not like feeding people to the lions no one would come to watch. People would cheer on blood and gore just for sport. They enjoy this. |
10-02-2009, 01:19 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Seattle
|
media decides what to show and how to edit what's shown. both to provide sensation to keep eyes on commercials and promote opinions /ideas it wants.
media decides to have shouting matches or calm discussions. people do give in to their urge to rubber neck a car crash but media decides to hold their attention with said car crashes.
__________________
when you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer. Superstition ain't the way. |
10-02-2009, 12:44 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: My head.
|
^^ I understand so far. I am biased though because the media doesn't tell you that you NEED that brand new hybrid car. They tell you how much more gas you will save and all the cool bells and whistles they added to the sirius radio that can control you neighbors dogs mind.
What the media does is sell you something. A sensible person would say no thanks. But it is a majority that will be taken in and actually be convinced that they do in fact need whatever it is they see on TV. I think blaming the media is a classic case of how people blame money for all the evil in the world. The population is entirely to blame for what it sees and does. For a very long time people have been fascinated by drama. And when soap.shakespear.tv was not enough they decided that reality tv is what people need. During my insomnia filled nights when I am absorbing the tube I usually just flip over the reality tv shows and channels. But I'm a minority in this case. It broadcasts only because many people like to watch it. |
10-02-2009, 12:54 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
I'd say both - to an extent. I think the influences, nefarious and not, are legion - populations create and the media, indeed, translates and circumscribes - in effect, telling people what they want to see - based on basic commercial tenets such as salability and ease of distribution.
---------- Post added at 04:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ---------- Quote:
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
10-02-2009, 01:10 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Still Free
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
|
At the point that we the people decided to willfully use "the news" as a means of entertaining ourselves, we handed ourselves over to the media. It was our submission to them that allowed them to "make us" into what we are today.
When our standards slip from truth to entertainment, the media becomes the puppet master.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead. "Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly." |
10-02-2009, 02:23 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Milan - Italy
|
Are you familiar with the perturbed feedback systems?
Like electrical control circuits or evidently (but not trivially at all) the earth's atmosphere? In a utopian world, where nobody wants to make anything but giving the audience what the audience want is a simple feedback system: the producer makes something, the audience gives a feedback, the producer make something that can satisfy that feedback and so on, till you reach an ideal equilibrium. It's like the body controlling yours blood beats when you start jogging: "raise it! A little higher. Too high, this rythm will faint you in a moment, try a bit lower. Lower again... too low, the muscles wants more oxigen try the half... you got it!". In that world WE are the media. In a real world the producer strive to give audience not only what they want but also try tu amuse the audience, they have to face that people get bored watching the same things, they have too face the fact that they don't wanna be part of the "equilibrium" they wanna rise over the other to make more profit, in the same time he have to face the budget guy and the marketing rep. So he don't have to give the exact response to the feedback, sometimes his above his power (the producer doesn't have infinite money, and doesn't work for the sake of art) and below his expectations (he want to stand over the mass and beat the competition, not only be a part of that equilibrium), so try to put in the market a product he think will have success, in that way he perturbate the audience strive for equilibrium (like putting an obstacle to the jogging of our friend) and the feedback can be good or can be bad, can instill new ideas in the audience perturbating succesfully (convince the friend to stop or continue another way), or can be ignored and the audience will keep running over the same objective. That kind of system, with a feedback, perturbed and so on, under some condition are called with the fancy and most known name of "Chaotic systems". I hope I made my point, I can see it clearly in my mind but is something I studied and worked for a lot of time, and trying to explain it and to be crystal clear in foreign language is far more difficoult than I expected
__________________
English N00b - Please help if you have time and correct my errors |
10-02-2009, 02:36 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
10-02-2009, 02:44 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Truly, this post makes me underscore yet again why I believe media education matters. Some of these are stolen right from the MEF, but are good nonetheless.
Statistics:
Clearly media plays a HUGE part in our life, and so many people are blissfully or willfully ignorant of the part that media, socialization and normalization play in who we are, why we do what we do, and ultimately what we find attractive and what we spend our money on. That's just about everything, so it's worth learning about. Link to the MEF handouts: Handouts & Articles | Media Education Foundation My favorite; How to be a Critical Media Viewer:
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel Last edited by Jinn; 10-02-2009 at 02:47 PM.. |
10-02-2009, 02:53 PM | #20 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
I agree with what you wrote.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
10-02-2009, 07:36 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: New England
|
Clearly this is all boils down to who's to blame? If the media and us are interacting, is it their fault because they're bad, or our fault that we can't resist it? I personally believe every person is a rational being responsible for themselves, corresponding with th latter answer.
|
10-02-2009, 10:17 PM | #22 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Milan - Italy
|
thank you. Sorry for this trivial questions but translate metaphoric phrase of other languages isn't easy at all
In Italian "Be behind somebody" metaphorically means 1- understand what he's saying 2- trying to seduce Jinn where you've taken this statics? They're very striking!
__________________
English N00b - Please help if you have time and correct my errors |
10-02-2009, 11:34 PM | #23 (permalink) | |||
Addict
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
further, 'the media' is a small group of people communicating on mass to the country(s) and I just don't see the concept of individual responsibility being on 'the masses' so much as these individual media pundits such as Glen Beck or Rush not to mention the owners like Rupert Murdoch. they all have agendas and it's to all of their advantage to keep the masses doing and thinking what they want. if I were to throw rocks at a murder of crows I know, most if not all of them would fly off, feeling threatened. even though I know crows are very smart. if you want the sheep to go right, bark at their left. it may be sad to think that humanity for all it's brain power can't be controlled so easily but they can and are. Mein Kampf Quote:
Quote:
NPR mentioned quite a while back the death toll in Iraq had met the 1000,000 mark but I have NEVER heard that being addressed on any commercial news ( granted I may have missed it if it was)
__________________
when you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer. Superstition ain't the way. |
|||
Tags |
make, media |
|
|