Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Motors


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2004, 05:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Nascar toughest form of Racing?

Thursday, May 27, 2004
Updated: May 28, 2:18 PM ET


By Jerry Bonkowski
Special to ESPN.com

It's been said so many times, usually accompanied by a snicker, that most auto racing fans pretty much come to expect it before the line is even finished.


"NASCAR drivers are athletes? Yeah, right! That's a good one!"


How many times have you heard that very same thing & or for that matter, were the one saying it? How many folks think hopping in a car and driving pedal-to-the-metal for a few hours is no more exerting than hitting the McDonald's drive-thru?


Well, it's time to set this straight. If anyone has any hesitation in saying that NASCAR drivers are athletes, it's time they seriously consider the feat that is Sunday's Coca-Cola 600 at Lowe's Motor Speedway.


It's the longest, most grueling and exhausting race of all the major motorsports' series (well, the 24 Hours of Le Mans deserves its own category, so it's exempt from this discussion). Indianapolis stops at 500, thinking that's enough. Formula One, well, forget it; the folks on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean wouldn't even think of racing on a track for 600 miles. They usually decide 70 warp-speed laps is plenty.


About the only thing that comes close to comparing is the off-road Baja 1000 -- but then, that's split up over a couple of days.


No, there is no other major race in the world that features just one driver that can match the Coca-Cola 600 for the challenge it presents and the physical, mental and emotional drain it puts on drivers.


They have to go 600 miles, which means 400 laps around the 1.5-mile LMS track, at average speeds hovering in the neighborhood of 150-mph or more. That means usually four hours-plus of straight-through, non-stop racing, with no breaks, no TV timeouts and having to endure the feeling of being like a piece of meat inside a microwave, with temperatures inside their race cars that oftentimes soar past 130 degrees.


Oh yeah, lest we forget, perhaps the biggest challenge facing drivers over the course of the race: not even one bathroom break. That's why when cars pull into the pits for the six or seven stops they'll have to have during the course of the event, drivers are very cautious about limiting their fluid intake to just enough water or energy drinks to give them a sample of refreshment, but not to the point where they have to stop the car, hop out and find the nearest Port-A-Potty.


"You get so dehydrated and can easily lose 10 pounds (off your body) in just that one race," said Tony Stewart, who nearly collapsed a couple of years ago when he exited his car after the 600. Of course, that was also the year Stewart performed the so-called "double-double," racing in the morning and early afternoon in the Indy 500, taking a quick jet to Charlotte, and then hopping into his stock car for the 600. That's 1,100 miles total & but another story in and of itself.


Let's translate what the 43 drivers will go through in Sunday's 600 in more layman terms. Take, for example, the upcoming family summer vacation, and hypothetically comparing racing in the Coca-Cola 600 to driving from New York to Los Angeles, more than 3,000 miles, straight through, in less than two days at, say, 80 miles per hour.


With only 15-second gas fill-up stops & and with no bathroom breaks.


That's pretty much the same concept of driving in the 600.



Dale Earnhardt Jr. gave up smoking to improve his chances of winning a title.


When the Coca-Cola 600's predecessor, the World 600, made its debut in 1960, the race was even longer -- oftentimes stretching to close to eight hours in length, because that was the nature of the mechanical beasts at the time, namely much slower race cars. It's a wonder how drivers managed to survive back then.


During this year's pre-season Nextel Cup media tour in the Charlotte area back in January, one of the main things many drivers talked about -- after discussing the merits of the upcoming 10-race, season within a season "Chase for the Championship -- was how keeping in shape has become more important in recent years.


A perfect example is Dale Earnhardt Jr. Not only will the driver of the red No. 8 Chevrolet turn 30 later this year, but he also knew it was time to get serious about his health and physical condition, to prepare as best he could for the grueling 40-race season (36 regular season races and four exhibitions), if he was going to mount a serious challenge for this season's championship.


Not only did Junior reportedly quit smoking, he also started watching his weight and what he was eating and cut way back on partying. The reason is simple: He wanted to have the energy to sustain the whole season. Many drivers actually turn their in-season physical conditioning programs up a couple notches a few weeks before the 600.


There's numerous other drivers who approach their physical conditioning just like their driving: serious and straight-forward, including veterans like the seemingly ageless Mark Martin, who may be 45 in years, but has the stamina and physical shape of a 25-year-old. There's others like Jeff Burton, who could easily take on someone twice his size.


Or what about Robby Gordon, who will be attempting his fourth "double-double" Sunday, starting his day in the Circle City (Indy) and finishing in the Queen City (Charlotte).


In one of his pre-race diaries for The Associated Press this week, Gordon talked about the significance of not only diet, but the mind's focus.


"I've discovered that doing the "double" is more mental than physical, at least for me," he said. "There's no doubt, though, the effects of 3.5 G-loads in the turns at Indy and a humid night in Charlotte will strain my 35-year-old body.


"For years my pre-race ritual has been to eat a turkey sandwich, but on Sunday morning, I plan instead to drink plenty of liquids. There's so much wind rushing around in an open-cockpit Indy car that you don't have the same sense of heat buildup and dehydration as in a fully enclosed stock car. Two years ago, I got severe stomach cramps during the Coca-Cola 600 because I'd lost more body fluids than I realized. I won't let that happen again."


So it's pretty apparent that staying in shape has become serious business for Nextel Cup drivers, both for Sunday's 600-mile joust, as well as the several thousands of miles they log during the course of the season on racetracks from Daytona, Fla., to Fontana, Calif.


Race car drivers aren't athletes? That's the easy mantra for those who have never tried it.


For while they might not be able to go one-on-one against Shaquille O'Neal on a basketball court, it's a sure bet they could outlast him behind the wheel.


Jerry Bonkowski covers NASCAR for ESPN.com. He can be reached at Motorsportwriter@MSN.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can't believe this writer would suggest that nascar is harder than formula 1 because they can't go to the bathroom for 4 hours. Nascar driving is not easy, but steady state cruising is a lot easier than formula 1's acceleration at 2 g's, turns at 3 g's, and decelerations at 4.5 g's. Dozens of times per lap.

Ooohh! Dale Earnhardt Jr quit smoking. Now we know he must be a serious athlete.

Now I am not saying that driving does not require athletism and skill (my autocrossing is a rush for 60 second laps), or that nascar is wimpy, but do not put it above formula 1 as an athletic endeavor.
pocon1 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 06:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
I really dislike NASCAR, I just don't see the fun in going around in circles for 4 hours, it must be boring to drive, but to watch, I'd rather watch grass grow.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 08:42 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Diego, CA.
I imagine most of the skill in Nascar is mental. You can never let your brain fall asleep. 130+ mph being 12" or less apart from the next guy... can you even begin to imagine the reaction time neccessary? Yes, Formula 1 had much more physical strain, but the mental strain in Nascar would be incredible. To me, the stress involved in racing so dangerously close at those speeds for so long would be far more exhausting the getting tossed around in the f1 cars.
__________________
Dont cry kid, It's not your fault you suck.
Peryn is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 10:43 AM   #4 (permalink)
In transition
 
Location: north, no south abit, over to the right, getting warmer...there!
IMO F1, is by far "the toughest form of racing", that or Rally.
matteo101 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 12:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Oh God, the rain!
I always liked f1 It seems much more action packed.
Asuka{eve} is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 01:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
In transition
 
Location: north, no south abit, over to the right, getting warmer...there!
Shumacher wins the european grand prix. I was cheering for Sato, but unfortunately that honda engine has exploded again.
matteo101 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 03:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Go faster!
 
DEI37's Avatar
 
Location: Wisconsin
F1 is so boring. I can't stand racing that calls a 10 second lead a close race. In NASCAR, you can have all 43 cars covering a third of that time, and a close finish is hundredths of a second, and a matter of inches, as the cars are rubbing. That, is racing.

Oh, and you'll NEVER hear team orders to let a teammate by to pad their championship. A sanctioning body that allows that is absolutely pathetic.
__________________
Generally speaking, if you were to get what you really deserve, you might be unpleasantly surprised.
DEI37 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 04:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tilted
 
I'm sorry but NASCAR is not the toughest form of racing, take a look at the Champ Cars (former CART or w.e you call them) , they race on ovals/street circuits/road courses (long beach, road america, milwaukee, denver, mexico come to mind) no power steering, no power brakes, actual gearbox they have to shift at every corner, no traction control, 750 horses behind them..
Tester123 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 04:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Once drivers get to that high of a rank in professional racing, it's all pretty similar. They all have excellent car control, and must know what's going on around them at all times. Nascar drivers would do great on rally courses, and F1 drivers could also do quite well in stock cars.
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 04:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Subjecting yourself to stress for the sake of simply running a longer race than average does not make you an athlete. Driving a fast car in ovals does not make you an athlete.

You may BE an athlete, and being in shape may make you a better driver, but this particular activity is not athletic.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 05:19 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
DEI37, I know you are a big NASCAR fan, which is fine, but I need to let you in on a little secret; the cars finish so close to each other because of all of the cautions and yellow flags. These lump the drivers together. This is so everyone can finish together because the sponsors won't support if they cannot get their names on tv. So the cars have to be lumped together.

Nascar can be sloppy and let the cars touch, because if open-wheel cars touch wheels, all hell breaks loose. It takes a lot more balls to drive six inches away from each other, than for nascar drivers to bump each other.

And please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Earnhardt die trying to block someone else from getting past his teammate?
Most people and drivers agree that what happened to Barichello vs Schumacher was absolutely ridiculous.

Also, I watched in car footage once of a formula 1 race, and the distance the cars followed each other was amazing. They brake much harder than Nascar can ever dream of, and they brake HARD. These cars would dive into corners, the lead car would hit the brakes, and before you could anticipate it sitting on the couch, the other driver would be on the brakes. It was amazing and it scared the shit out of me. These guys reflexes are incredible.
pocon1 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 06:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Champ Cars is where its at
www.champcarworldseries.com
Tester123 is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 06:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
lonely rolling star
 
sadistikdreams's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle.
Fuck.
Street racing is where its at.
Less than a minute, and there's always the threat of death.
Not from driving, but from getting a bullet in your bum.
__________________
"Besides the noble art of getting things done, there is the noble art of leaving things undone.
The wisdom of life consists in the elimination of non-essentials.
"
-Lin Yutang

hearts, by d.a.
sadistikdreams is offline  
Old 05-30-2004, 11:49 PM   #14 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by DEI37
...Oh, and you'll NEVER hear team orders to let a teammate by to pad their championship. A sanctioning body that allows that is absolutely pathetic.
Just thought I'd let you know, team orders are banned as of this season, so no more of that.

Also, I think it's hard to compare the two sports. F1 is like running 10 miles while getting punched, kicked, picked up and dropped regularly. NASCAR is like running a marathon, maybe two. I have respect for both as sports, but I fins NASCAR boring to watch. However, I'm guessing its like any sport, if you get into the "story" of whats going on backstage and who the people, I'm sure its fascinating. But, if not, its just: "Left...left...left...push that guy into the barrier...left...left..."
__________________
roadrazer - 300kgs, 300hp = pure fun.
Rippley is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 12:44 AM   #15 (permalink)
Loser
 
99% of the cart/f1 cars are not that difficulty to drive, or any paddle shifted car for that matter. Having driven an SAE car, I can say that it was pretty simple.

I would say that the rally boys are on par with Nascar. They do require similar if not better skills, but they do it for a much shorter time.
WarWagon is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 04:43 AM   #16 (permalink)
Go faster!
 
DEI37's Avatar
 
Location: Wisconsin
Quote from Pocon1:
Quote:
And please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Earnhardt die trying to block someone else from getting past his teammate?
Some say it was, some think it wasn't. I think it wasn't, after watching the replay countless times. The #40 wouldn't have gotten to the front two in the last quarter of a lap, so I don't think it would have mattered. The accident was payback from when Earnhardt bumped Marlin for a spot earlier in the race. Marlin's tap was intentional, although obviously the outcome could NEVER have been predicted. Definitely one of the saddest, if not THE saddest day in auto racing history.

Quote from Rippley:
Quote:
Just thought I'd let you know, team orders are banned as of this season, so no more of that.
Good. That was the only F1 race I'd watched anything of, and I think I watched about three minutes of it. And, that was my intro to F1. As a diehard NASCAR junkie, you can imagine my reaction. It WAS comforting to hear the boo's from the crowd and the negative reaction from the commentators. I'm glad that crap got banned. Personally, I wouldn't have heeded the team orders, but, that's just me.

As far as this topic in general...ALL racers are athletes. I'll admit that F1, CART, IRL, rally, and NASCAR drivers are in excellent shape, and take care of their bodies...in general. I think the NASCAR drivers see more of the mental stress over the other drivers, simply because they drive a car with 800HP that doesn't have traction control, has a full manual gearbox, and requires more concentration to drive...relative to F1, that is. Plus, they drive for 500 miles most weekends. Last night's 600 miler was incredible.
__________________
Generally speaking, if you were to get what you really deserve, you might be unpleasantly surprised.
DEI37 is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 06:36 AM   #17 (permalink)
Insane
 
im not overly familiar with nascar, or F1.

But I do beleive Rally championships to be the 'toughest' form of racing.
junglistic is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 09:07 AM   #18 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Kentucky
I don't like NASCAR, but I will admit that the NASCAR racers have more mental endurance than other racers. Going for 500 miles, in an endless circle, 12" away from other cars, in a race suit in a 130 degree car would tax anyones ability to concentrate. In a sport where winners are seconds away from each other in a 500 mile race, you can see just exactly how much concentration and control you need.

That been said, the real athletes (in the physical sense) are the motorcycle racers, you will never see one of those over age 30 (at professional levels) and you won't see one of those being the least bit overweight ( again, at professional levels).

The control of their vehicle is completely based on their bodies movement. With car racing, they are safety-harnessed into their car, with their feet and and hands doing all the controls. Motorcycle racers have to lean , operate a control with both feet, operate multiple controls with each hand, and have to change body posture completely for different operations ( deceleration, turning , jumps in motocross...)
BooRadley is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 09:56 AM   #19 (permalink)
Junkie
 
was wondering if anybody would mention the bikes, that was the first thing to come to my mind, they have to do a lot more work to move around the track.
__________________
name's Bramage, Dain Bramage
opey99 is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 11:11 AM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by WarWagon
99% of the cart/f1 cars are not that difficulty to drive, or any paddle shifted car for that matter. Having driven an SAE car, I can say that it was pretty simple.

I would say that the rally boys are on par with Nascar. They do require similar if not better skills, but they do it for a much shorter time.
F1 cars aren't that difficult to drive? I don't think the SAE cars (although I have only glanced over the OSU Buckeyes site there's does 0-60 in 3.4s and 1.5 G's of lateral force) are on the same level as F1 cars, but it will take more reading on my part. Do you have any links to info about these cars WarWagon?

FIA Rally and NASCAR are on par skill wise? I don't see trees, rocks, animals, people, and washed out roads in NASCAR. My vote goes to the Rally guys, not the guys who go round and round and round.
General Giap is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 11:56 AM   #21 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by WarWagon
99% of the cart/f1 cars are not that difficulty to drive, or any paddle shifted car for that matter. Having driven an SAE car, I can say that it was pretty simple.

OK. How many races have you run in that SAE car? How many of those races did you win? If you didn't win EVERY race you were in, then you think it's simple because you're not good enough yet
shakran is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 05:53 PM   #22 (permalink)
Addict
 
I might not know which racing style is the most difficult, but I do know that rally is by far the most interesting to watch.

I love it when a car gets flipped or something and all the spectators get together to flip it back over or push it out of a ditch.
yakimushi is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 06:46 PM   #23 (permalink)
FFT
Upright
 
The reason NASCAR is more popular than rally is that NASCAR events take place in stadiums. Rally events take place outside, in natural surroundings (most of the time). Therefore, less people can show up to watch it in person. Even when they do, they can only get part of the action due to the size of the course. The only stadium-based event in rally I've seen was during WRC Australia 2003, and that was just the first race.

This in addition to the fact that Rallies are generally held in Europe, and everywhere else besides the U.S..
FFT is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 10:08 PM   #24 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
I would fall asleep and crash after the first three laps of driving in Nascar. I have no problem with anyone who finds it interesting, as some of my hobbies are widely considered to be as interesting as growing mold on cheese, but I find any sort of circle-track racing to be as exciting as, and less stimulating than, a rectal exam. This is not a gripe with nascar, it is a gripe with all circle/oval track racing. F1 on an oval? Good night. I'm not going to sit there and get sunburn to watch a bunch of guys turn left for six hours. To get me to watch oval track, one of five things would have to occur.

First, the last few cars on the starting line would be outfitted with Roman chariot wheel blades. These would be of sufficient size to not only destroy the wheels of other drivers, but of sufficient size to destroy vital engine components as well as any driver who did not outfit his door with a large steel plate that would completely throw off the left/right weight distribution.

The second option is to outfit the each driver with his choice of a caltrop dispensor, or an oil-slick dropper. Use would require careful thought in addition to the concentration required to keep yourself on the track, as you wouldn't want spikes or oil in a spot where you might hit in on the next lap.

Third, yellow flags would be restricted. The caution would end the second the driver of the disabled vehicle was safely over the barrier. Alternately, the flags could be eliminated completely, with a 30-lap penalty for hitting a driver who is trying to get to safety. If, at some point, the track were to become completely blocked, the drivers would have to get out and push the blockages off the side of the track.

Fourth, several knife-wielding monkeys who have been given a large dose of PCP would be let loose into pit lane every time a car pulls in. A man in full cowboy garb with a lasso would be stationed at each end of the lane to prevent monkeys from running onto the track. An extra member of each pit crew would be required to operate a beanbag gun, used to attempt to direct the monkeys toward your opponents' pit crews. Alternately, this member would be stationed on the back wall of the stadium facing the pit lane, aremd with an army-issue sniper rifle. He would be in charge of disposing of the monkeys bewfore they reached his team. Don't feel the need to tell me that this is dangerous to the pit crews, I know that. Shooting another team's pit crew or driver would result in the disqualification of his team for the remainder of the season, and the next season as well if the current season were more than halfway through. This option would most likely require a split screen format with the pit on the bottom and the actual reace on the top.

The fifth solution would not be applicable to races other than NASCAR due to space limitations in other race cars. The drivers would be able to reach out the window during the race to pick up duffel bags that were placed on the track by track employees armed with larger versions of the t-shirt launchers that are used to send shirts into the crowd. These men would be explicitly forbidden to aim at the cars themselves. The bags would contain one of several items. The first contains between one and five banana peels that can be deployed by means of a small roof-mounted catapult or a hatch in the floor. The second is a ceramic turtle shell that can be lobbed at other drivers. The third is a smoke bomb that could be deployed in a similar method to the banana peels. Foruth is a one-pound bottle of nitrous that could be attached to a quick connect system and activated via a button on the steering wheel. Since various powerups from Mario Kart cannot be implemented in real life, the ultimate powerup would be a card that can be presented to the pit crew, allowing them to remove the carburetor restrictor plate during the final 30 laps if the driver was more than two laps behind when pitting in.


Quote:
Originally posted by pocon1
And please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Earnhardt die trying to block someone else from getting past his teammate?
Most people and drivers agree that what happened to Barichello vs Schumacher was absolutely ridiculous.
Didn't he die because he wasn't wearing his seatbelt properly?
MSD is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 10:34 PM   #25 (permalink)
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally posted by shakran
OK. How many races have you run in that SAE car? How many of those races did you win? If you didn't win EVERY race you were in, then you think it's simple because you're not good enough yet
What I'm getting at here is that driving an SAE or cart style car, aside from being quick and knowing how to pick a decent line, pales in comparison to the endurance needed to race for hours and hours on end. I've also had my fair share of time behind the wheel of go karts when I was younger, and its the same principle. Same goes for drag cars, as well as auto x.

Not to mention, most people don't think theres any skill involved other than just holding the car straight while driving in a circle. This is because they haven't the faintest idea about the skill it takes to successfully draft a car in front of you at 180mph, how to position your car to let momentum propel you through a corner, or how to be so in tune with a car that you can easily detect 1/2 pound of air difference in any of your tires.
WarWagon is offline  
Old 05-31-2004, 11:56 PM   #26 (permalink)
Addict
 
Vaultboy's Avatar
 
Location: Third World
Quote:
Originally posted by Elitegibson
Once drivers get to that high of a rank in professional racing, it's all pretty similar. They all have excellent car control, and must know what's going on around them at all times. Nascar drivers would do great on rally courses, and F1 drivers could also do quite well in stock cars.
All F1 drivers come from other forms of racing, and not all of them even took the F3000 route, considered the step-up to F1. Case in point would be Juan Pablo Montoya. Nigel Mansell went from F1 to NASCAR (I think). Didn't he win in his rookie season or something? So yeah, I would agree: Racing at that level is all pretty similar. Except maybe for Rally.
__________________
"Failing tastes of bile and dog vomit. Pity any man that gets used to that taste."
Vaultboy is offline  
Old 06-01-2004, 01:56 AM   #27 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Wherever I lay my hind quarters
Mansell went from F1 to Indy (or was it Cart?), with the Newman Haas team. He went from the top in F1 to the top team (at the time) in the US, which kinda made the move easier.

And he also did well in the events not expected of him (ie. Ovals). Shame that the 500 eluded him.
clonmult is offline  
Old 06-01-2004, 05:30 AM   #28 (permalink)
Fear the bunny
 
Location: Hanging off the tip of the Right Wing
In my opinion, the form of racing that's hardest on the human body would have to be the one that not only was most mentally challenging, but also created the most G-forces and most repeated instances of G-forces. That could be nothing other than Formula 1 racing.

NASCAR is for rednecks.
__________________
Activism is a way for useless people to feel important.
BoCo is offline  
Old 06-01-2004, 05:02 PM   #29 (permalink)
Banned
 
Neither NASCAR or F1 are the hardest form of motorsport: that crown defo goes to motorcycle racing. MotoGP has the same speeds and forces of F1, but you're hanging off the edge of a bike on the limits of traction. Turning a wheel and shifting does not take nearly as much out of you as leaning into turns, controlling the wheelies without traction control, and all the things (clutch, shifting) that car drivers do as well. The Isle of Man TT is the most demanding and dangerous of all: 1000cc superbikes pushing 200 bhp running on 37 miles of public roads well over 100 mph. Until this year it was 6 laps, about 2 hours of full throttle. Not to mention is you make a mistake, it will probably be fatal. That, my friends, is pure balls, pure skill, and the undoubted toughest form of racing.
Globber is offline  
Old 06-01-2004, 06:44 PM   #30 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Moto GP riders are some hardcore racers I love watching that, I think I change my answer.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 06-01-2004, 07:27 PM   #31 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: CA
Moto GP is definately much more tougher, at least in my humble opinion.
gdr2004 is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 01:35 PM   #32 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: florida
moto gp, motocross, f1, i think are all more difficult and harder on the body then nascar. The g loadings from f1 are just insane, while you have to throw your body around on a motogp bike, and take the abuse of the jumps of motocross.
Serpent is offline  
Old 06-04-2004, 06:22 AM   #33 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: MN
I will agree that racing is hard work, after a full weekend of qualifing, practice and racing it does take its toll. I don't really feel that Nascar (including the 600) is "harder" than several other forms of racing. What makes it hard - the time? Well....

Dakar Rally
24 hrs races (daytona, etc.)
Baja 1000
GNCC

One could argue that its "hard" becuase of physical strain...

Moto GP
WRC
Motocross
Shifter Carts

The only other way I could see it being "hard" is the mental strain and stress on the bodies reflexs

F1
Cart
Camp Car


...It's not that I am saying there it isn't hard to run in a Nascar (I have spend a couple years running short track in a Super Late Model, I understand from first hand how taxing it is) but I think that there are a lot of other types of automotive racing that are more taxing on the body in almost all respects. In terms of roundy-round running a 1.5 oval for 600 miles, I don't think would be as bad as running a 1/2 mile for 250 miles (normal short track event). I have run a 1/4, 3/8 and a 1/2 mile tracks - the 1/4 was defently the hardest on your body.
__________________
The local track whore
Spyder_Venom is offline  
Old 06-04-2004, 06:33 AM   #34 (permalink)
Shackle Me Not
 
jwoody's Avatar
 
Location: Newcastle - England.
Deathrace 2000 was the toughest race ever despite it's homo-erotic overtones.

__________________
.
jwoody is offline  
Old 06-04-2004, 08:50 AM   #35 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Leeds, UK
You're all wrong... the Isle of Man TT Races is by far the toughest and most dangerous race in the world.

If you don't have the slightest clue what the Isle of Man TT is then take a look here http://autos.msn.com/advice/article....20201&src=News

For all the rest that have heard of it, I'd expect you to agree with me thats its the toughest of tough when it comes to racing. It gets held annually on the Isle of Man around a 37.73 mile road racing course. It's, sort of, one of those things that have to be witnessed first hand to realise the danger involved... imagine racing at an average speed of 120mph on roads too thin for two cars to pass through for 3 37.73 mile laps. I mean, these roads are not race track material in the slightest. They are roads maintained by the Isle of Man (an island measuring 21 miles x 9 miles) Government... really bumpy and stupidly twisty. Also, half the Manx population live beside the course so if you crash out, there isn't any specially designed crash barriers to soften your impact, just plain old concrete walls. On average, each TT claims about 10 riders and 5 pedestrians, quite alot for an Island with a population of 65,000.

I live on the Isle of Man so i've seen the in's and out's of the Manx TT, it's brilliant, however it takes the lives of many people, for eg. the 2004 TT started 4 days ago and already 5 people have been killed (2 racers, 3 others from general road accidents involving bikes). It also turns the roads over here into death traps for pedestrians. We hold a day called "Mad Sunday" in the middle of the TT fortnight. This is where you can flog the ass off your bike or car without the restriction of speed limits as long as you stick to the TT course.

__________________
Why's Snoop Dog carry an umbrella?

Fo' Drizzle
bollocks is offline  
Old 06-05-2004, 02:45 PM   #36 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: bay area, ca
yes, those TT's at isle of man are crazy
BrassSteve is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:35 AM   #37 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Canada eh?
Quote:
Originally posted by DEI37
F1 is so boring. I can't stand racing that calls a 10 second lead a close race. In NASCAR, you can have all 43 cars covering a third of that time, and a close finish is hundredths of a second, and a matter of inches, as the cars are rubbing. That, is racing.

Oh, and you'll NEVER hear team orders to let a teammate by to pad their championship. A sanctioning body that allows that is absolutely pathetic.
Right, NASCAR never lets team orders affect the outcome of a race.
__________________
Subvert the Dominant Paradigm
etla is offline  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:27 AM   #38 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally posted by clonmult
Mansell went from F1 to Indy (or was it Cart?), with the Newman Haas team. He went from the top in F1 to the top team (at the time) in the US, which kinda made the move easier.

And he also did well in the events not expected of him (ie. Ovals). Shame that the 500 eluded him.
IT WAS CART!! CART CART CART! CHAMP CARS>>!
Tester123 is offline  
Old 06-10-2004, 10:32 AM   #39 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: the hills of aquafina.
Quote:
Originally posted by WarWagon
99% of the cart/f1 cars are not that difficulty to drive, or any paddle shifted car for that matter. Having driven an SAE car, I can say that it was pretty simple.
At an F1 car's maximum braking force, a driver is placed under 4+ G's of negative G-force loading. Brian Herta, after his F1 test, was quoted as saying that when the car shifted gears "it felt like someone punching him in the back", or something to that effect. Just imagine doing 4 negative G's and being punched in the back, depending on the track, anywhere from 6 to 13 times a lap, for 60+ laps. exhausting? Me thinks so.

And lest we not forget that CART had to cancel an event at Texas motorspeedway in 2001 because the drivers were getting dizzy because of the G force effect. Over the planned 600 mile event, the drivers would have been subjected to 4.74+ G's every 5 seconds, more than 800 times. Unconsciousness ensues.
Edit:
I got these facts from this article: http://www.howstuffworks.com/question633.htm

Nascrap cars wouldn't even stick to the track long enough to generate these kinds of forces.

Edit, part Duex:
Upon further investigation, I see that several guys already mentioned this...Serpent, Spyder_Venom, Glober also voiced the same opinions
__________________
"The problem with quick and dirty, as some people have said, is that the dirty remains long after the quick has been forgotten" - Steve McConnell

Last edited by cartmen34; 06-10-2004 at 10:40 AM..
cartmen34 is offline  
Old 06-10-2004, 12:49 PM   #40 (permalink)
Fledgling Dead Head
 
krwlz's Avatar
 
Location: Clarkson U.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tester123
I'm sorry but NASCAR is not the toughest form of racing, take a look at the Champ Cars (former CART or w.e you call them) , they race on ovals/street circuits/road courses (long beach, road america, milwaukee, denver, mexico come to mind) no power steering, no power brakes, actual gearbox they have to shift at every corner, no traction control, 750 horses behind them..
I dont race, so I cant really say what would be "toughest". Id say each race embodies a differant aspect. But forced to choose, i think Ill go with the champ cars.

To watch though... Any race that regularly hits 200+ with lots of curves is fun to watch. The same turn over and over again? not my thing.
krwlz is offline  
 

Tags
form, nascar, racing, toughest

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360