Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Motors


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-16-2007, 04:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
What's your mechanical aptitude?

http://www.forddoctorsdts.com/quizze...alAptitude.php

Passing grade is 80%. I scored 88.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Insane
 
souzafone's Avatar
 
Pretty cool---I got a 74 drunk.
souzafone is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Poo-tee-weet?
 
JStrider's Avatar
 
Location: The Woodlands, TX
I got an 84, I rushed through it pretty quickly.

and some of the stuff definently depends on prior knowledge... wasnt sure on all the symbols for the electrical diagram. and some of it was just vocabulary.
__________________
-=JStrider=-

~Clatto Verata Nicto
JStrider is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 07:41 AM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
bobby's Avatar
 
Location: 18,000+ posts on TFP #1,2,3,4 and 5,but I'm not counting!
82%...........but they don't tell what I missed???...xoxoxoo
__________________
"Life goes on,within you,and...with out you !" xoxoxoo
bobby is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:32 AM   #5 (permalink)
We work alone
 
LoganSnake's Avatar
 
Location: Cake Town
300 points - 60%

Not very surprising.
__________________
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing that you'll be an idiot in the future. Common sense is knowing that you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
LoganSnake is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 10:04 AM   #6 (permalink)
Riding the Ocean Spray
 
BadNick's Avatar
 
Location: S.E. PA in U Sofa
I also wish I knew what I got wrong ...my score was 82 but considering that I have a BSME and I'm Vice President of Engineering, that seems like a bad score for me. A demotion might be in order.
BadNick is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 10:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
86%. Not bad, for a high school drop-out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JStrider
and some of the stuff definently depends on prior knowledge...
I think that's kind of the point.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 01:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Datalife2's Avatar
 
68% failed lol. I went super fast.
__________________
where's my lighter?
Datalife2 is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Insane
 
82% with a BSME as well. Some of the questions I felt were ambiguous, maybe I just needed to slow down a bit.
Bigwahzoo is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
Poo-tee-weet?
 
JStrider's Avatar
 
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
86%. Not bad, for a high school drop-out.



I think that's kind of the point.

from the paragraph before the test

"Mechanical aptitude tests do not measure what you know, but rather your ability to learn about and understand mechanical concepts and how things work."
__________________
-=JStrider=-

~Clatto Verata Nicto
JStrider is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by JStrider
from the paragraph before the test

"Mechanical aptitude tests do not measure what you know, but rather your ability to learn about and understand mechanical concepts and how things work."
My mistake. Seems my passing grade is paired with another typically male trait - I didn't read the directions.

Even still, I figured the electrical diagrams to be the hardest part to decipher overall and even those seem pretty self-evident to me; but then, I'm biased, as I learned how to draw a wiring diagram when I was 11.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 05:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
86% Kind of surprising, for whatever reason I tend not to score very well on these kind of tests.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 05:46 PM   #13 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
I got 98%...forgot that suction doesn't exist, and that atmospheric pressure 'pushed' the air in. Lame.

Oh, and you can review your scores by clicking the magnifying glass when you're done.
telekinetic is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 04:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
I got the same question wrong Twisted. But I disagree. as the piston moved downward, it creates a vacuum or "suction" on the opening where the valve is. That is why when an engine is running, it has vacuum in the intake, that is used for brake boost and any other vacuum operated device on the car. Suction DOES exist. But still an interesting test.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 05:01 AM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Ilow's Avatar
 
Location: Pats country
the electrical questions threw me. 74%, I guess I should go be a psychologist...
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about"
--Sam Harris
Ilow is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 06:38 AM   #16 (permalink)
Insane
 
ScottKuma's Avatar
 
Location: Maineville, OH
Fun Quiz! I got a passing grade of 86% -

Missed: 3, 11, 12, 38, 41, 48, 50

Of the ones I missed:
3: I forgot to count the teeth on the gears...figured it out on the next few questions.

11: just mis-read the worm gear.

12: mis-clicked

38: oops

41: had NO idea about this one.

50 DEFINITELY requires prior knowledge of what all of those shafts are...
__________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take from you everything you have.
-Gerald R. Ford

GoogleMap Me

Last edited by ScottKuma; 10-18-2007 at 06:43 AM..
ScottKuma is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:32 AM   #17 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
I missed the automatic transmission one because I read too fast and misinterpreted what they meant by the gears "rotating" and "turning." If they said "the assembly turns" and "each gear rotates," it would be less ambiguous. I just clicked the wrong answer on 9. Number 45 is ambiguous because they should have specified that they're talking about the force acting on the balloon, not "pressure outside of the balloon," which will be equal if they're in the same space. In number 26, I tripped up by thinking of the circuit as a series-parallel combination rather than a series with a bypass for one component (I was thinking of the switch as if it were a resistor in parallel with the middle bulb.) Then I fell for the good old suction trick question.

If the questions that I misinterpreted had been clearer and I had clicked the right button for 9, I would have had a 96, but I got a 90.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
Suction DOES exist. But still an interesting test.
Scientifically, there is no such thing as suction, just areas of higher and lower pressure. I didn't read all the answers before clicking.
MSD is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 09:02 AM   #18 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
I got the same question wrong Twisted. But I disagree. as the piston moved downward, it creates a vacuum or "suction" on the opening where the valve is. That is why when an engine is running, it has vacuum in the intake, that is used for brake boost and any other vacuum operated device on the car. Suction DOES exist. But still an interesting test.
No, they're right, the piston moving down produces a low pressure area that is filled by the atmospheric pressure pushing air in. It seems like a trivial distinction, but it is helpful to know an NA car recieves air at 14PSI when you're doing turbo or supercharger calculations (at a very very crude level, 14psi = twice as much air = twice as much horsepower, allowing for proper support mods.)

Last edited by telekinetic; 10-18-2007 at 09:07 AM..
telekinetic is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 09:49 AM   #19 (permalink)
Insane
 
Dane Bramage's Avatar
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
82%. I missed stuff on the electrical diagrams and a couple on pulleys and fulcrums.... but I studied English in college. I guess I'm just glad to have passed.
__________________
Every passing hour brings the Solar System forty-three thousand miles closer to Globular Cluster M13 in Hercules — and still there are some misfits who insist that there is no such thing as progress.
Kurt Vonnegut - Sirens of Titan
Dane Bramage is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 11:04 AM   #20 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedmosaic
No, they're right, the piston moving down produces a low pressure area that is filled by the atmospheric pressure pushing air in. It seems like a trivial distinction, but it is helpful to know an NA car recieves air at 14PSI when you're doing turbo or supercharger calculations (at a very very crude level, 14psi = twice as much air = twice as much horsepower, allowing for proper support mods.)
Sorry, but for the record I will just have to disagree with you on this one. I see the point you are trying to make, but in a real world situation, there is "14psi" of normal atmospheric pressure at all times at sea level. so a moving piston would create a vacuum based on the principal of air flow through a restriction (i.e. the open valve) If you were to actually connect a vacuum/pressure gauge to the cylinder you would see the fluctuations of vacuum (and pressure when on compression stroke). We did this experiment many years ago in our physics class when I was getting my degree in automotive technology. The question we had was based on a naturally aspirated engine, turning at normal cranking RPM of a standard V-8 engine. The solution was that since the movement of air at atmospheric pressure was too slow, a vacuum HAD to be introduced by the piston, otherwise the cylinder could not fill up fast enough to produce proper combustion. (based on volume of air that can be moved at atmospheric pressure, v/s volume of air that can be moved under vacuum)
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 05:44 PM   #21 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I got an 86%. Reviewing the test I should have got a 92%. Three stupid mistakes where I didnt pay attention, the only four I genuinely did not know were the questions about the pulleys and force. Dumb on my part.

And yes I agree question 48 was stupid. I think it really is both. Without the low pressure area created by the piston there would not be a place for the atmospheric pressure to go. But the atmospheric pressure does push it in, and the amount of atmospheric pressure does affect how much air goes in. If it was just the piston suction alone then I would think a naturally aspirated engine would make the same power regardless of altitude. Yet an engine makes 18% less power here in Denver than at sea level.
laconic1 is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 06:28 PM   #22 (permalink)
Ami
Upright
 
Ami's Avatar
 
Location: Jax
I got too bored with it and stopped at 26
Ami is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 06:58 PM   #23 (permalink)
 
MexicanOnABike's Avatar
 
Location: up north
66% it's been very very long since i had any reviews on mechanical stuff. oh well!
__________________
MexicanOnABike is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:06 PM   #24 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I got a 68%. I was destroyed by the electrical and engine-specific questions.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 11:25 PM   #25 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
Sorry, but for the record I will just have to disagree with you on this one. I see the point you are trying to make, but in a real world situation, there is "14psi" of normal atmospheric pressure at all times at sea level. so a moving piston would create a vacuum based on the principal of air flow through a restriction (i.e. the open valve) If you were to actually connect a vacuum/pressure gauge to the cylinder you would see the fluctuations of vacuum (and pressure when on compression stroke). We did this experiment many years ago in our physics class when I was getting my degree in automotive technology. The question we had was based on a naturally aspirated engine, turning at normal cranking RPM of a standard V-8 engine. The solution was that since the movement of air at atmospheric pressure was too slow, a vacuum HAD to be introduced by the piston, otherwise the cylinder could not fill up fast enough to produce proper combustion. (based on volume of air that can be moved at atmospheric pressure, v/s volume of air that can be moved under vacuum)
Well, for the record, are you trying to say that the test and I are both wrong?

I'm confused (but curious) by your description of your experiment...any more details on exactly what you were trying to prove?

There are two measurements of pressure--gauge pressure, which compares something to atmospheric, and absolute pressure, which is the actual scientific pressure present. If you had some way of measuring absolute pressure on a cycling cylinder, it would have just read less than 14psi on the down stroke, higher (atmospheric x the compression ratio, usually about 9:1, so 126psi-ish) on the upstroke, and extremely high during combustion.

I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "The solution was that since the movement of air at atmospheric pressure was too slow", as air that is at atmospheric pressure won't move at all! It won't move unless there is a pressure difference, such as the one set up by the low pressure volume created by a dropping piston.

In the real world, when you are talking about moving gasses, it isn't a matter of opinion--there is no such thing as suction or vacuum. These are both laymans terms to describe the observed effects of a pressure differential. When speaking scientifically, forces from pressure differences are always a push, never a pull. (and yes, dirty jokes about the fact that therefore nothing can ever be sucked abound...luckily they can still be blown )

Our two (real) choices were:
In a NA engine, air enters the cylinder...
From suction caused by the piston going down
From atmospheric pressure pushing it in

Since suction doesn't exist, then the answer becomes obvious. The expanded volume of the cylinder created by the descending piston temporarily creates a low pressure volume inside the cylinder, and atmospheric pressure pushes new air in. If you still don't agree, think about how the situation would change if you changed atmospheric pressure. Bring it to the top of a mountain where there's less air pressure? Guess what, less air gets pushed into the motor, and you have less power.

I have a feeling that you and I are just using different words to describe what's happening, however in this specific case, the question was one of definition, so which definition is more accurate is what it has to come down to. My gas dynamics prof would be horrified if I ever put "suction caused by the piston pulls air through the valve" on any of my tests.
telekinetic is offline  
Old 10-19-2007, 06:00 AM   #26 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
OK, lets see if I can clairify my opinion:

What I am saying is that in a NA engine, where no movement of the piston is present, and the intake valve is open, we have a ballance of pressure on both sides(14.7 psi at sea level). when the piston moves downward, it creates a "negative pressure" or vacuum in laymans terms. This difference in pressure causes the outside air to be drawn in. So in MY opinion, it is the creation of "negative pressure" that causes the air to move, not just the static pressure of atmospheric pressure that moves itself. This leads me to the hypothosis that it is the VACUUM that is the action, and the air movement is the reaction.

As far as our experiment, we were using an absolute pressure gauge, and slow motion video of the needle. of course we never reached lower that 7 psi of "negative pressure", as those who know much about science, it is near impossible to actually attain 0 psi in most scientific experiments that are done in a classroom lab. the lowest we ever did using a pump was 4 psi before the cylinder cracked.(we were using a glass cylinder with a small amount of mercury in the bottom to see if we could detect any "movement")

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyBill5280
If it was just the piston suction alone then I would think a naturally aspirated engine would make the same power regardless of altitude. Yet an engine makes 18% less power here in Denver than at sea level.
The reason you have less power in a NA engine as nothing to do DIRECTLY with the atmospheric pressure, but the DENSITY of the air that is draw into the engine. Yes A.P. is lower in denver, but the REASON it is lower is that the air in Denver is less dense. DENSITY of the air is what makes the difference in engine power, that is why in racing, colder weather is prefered, because colder air is more dense, and this gives the engines more power.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 10-19-2007, 08:25 AM   #27 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
OK, lets see if I can clairify my opinion:

What I am saying is that in a NA engine, where no movement of the piston is present, and the intake valve is open, we have a ballance of pressure on both sides(14.7 psi at sea level). when the piston moves downward, it creates a "negative pressure" or vacuum in laymans terms. This difference in pressure causes the outside air to be drawn in. So in MY opinion, it is the creation of "negative pressure" that causes the air to move, not just the static pressure of atmospheric pressure that moves itself. This leads me to the hypothosis that it is the VACUUM that is the action, and the air movement is the reaction.
If you were getting a negative reading, you weren't measuring absolute pressure. If you had been, there wouldn't be any negative pressure (there's no such thing), there would have just been some positive pressure lower than atmospheric. This isn't an action/reaction situation, it's a definition of terms. The piston creates a low pressure area that the atmospheric pressure fills. I'm not trying to tell you you don't undnerstand an engine--For most applications, your understanding is close enough to correct as to not matter. What I'm saying is that if it gets down to the brass tacks of the definition, like it did on this test, it's the pressure that does it.
telekinetic is offline  
Old 10-19-2007, 01:06 PM   #28 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
I guess you still werent quite understanding what I am trying to say. I am using the term "negative pressure" as any pressure below standard atmospheric pressure...i.e. anything below 14.7 psi at sea level. I still just personally disagree with you. Just to make sure, I called my old instructor and asked him about it. and he said TECHNICALLY both explanations are correct, it just depends on how you look at it. after we talked he took the test (i sent him the link) and he got a 100% (go figure) but he DID agree that in the scientific word, either answer would be correct, so really you and I are BOTH right! Thanx for the interesting conversation.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 10-20-2007, 09:05 PM   #29 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
I guess you still werent quite understanding what I am trying to say. I am using the term "negative pressure" as any pressure below standard atmospheric pressure...i.e. anything below 14.7 psi at sea level. I still just personally disagree with you. Just to make sure, I called my old instructor and asked him about it. and he said TECHNICALLY both explanations are correct, it just depends on how you look at it. after we talked he took the test (i sent him the link) and he got a 100% (go figure) but he DID agree that in the scientific word, either answer would be correct, so really you and I are BOTH right! Thanx for the interesting conversation.
My middle school and high school science teachers spent seven years hammering into my head the fact that "suction" does not exist, only areas of higher and lower pressure. Suction is a layman's term, not a scientific term and therefore not an acceptable answer on a test that measures scientific aptitude.
MSD is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:49 AM   #30 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
OK I will just stop here. i guess i can't get ANYONE to understand my point. I am NOT SAYING suction exists. i DO understand that it is merely a difference in pressures. but still, the question CAN and obviously HAS been in the way this test was set up, misunderstood. I think the question is a manner of interpretation. either way, the test is interesting, and I am happy that I only missed one question.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 10-28-2007, 08:25 AM   #31 (permalink)
Very Insignificant Pawn
 
Location: Amsterdam, NL
..

Last edited by flat5; 05-03-2008 at 01:11 AM..
flat5 is offline  
Old 11-05-2007, 09:40 PM   #32 (permalink)
part of the problem
 
squeeeb's Avatar
 
Location: hic et ubique
no surprise, i failed with a 68%

actually, i'm surprised i got a 68%

all i really know is "lefty loosy, righty tighty"

cool test, thanks for posting that
__________________
onward to mayhem!
squeeeb is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:01 PM   #33 (permalink)
Here
 
World's King's Avatar
 
Location: Denver City Denver
62%

Not surprised. I did get the electrical stuff right. My dad is an electrical engineer.
__________________
heavy is the head that wears the crown
World's King is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 02:30 PM   #34 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
I was always under the impression that suction fit this definition:
Quote:
A force that causes a fluid or solid to be drawn into an interior space or to adhere to a surface because of the difference between the external and internal pressures.
So i'm perplexed when i hear that suction doesn't really exist because what's really going on is that fluids flow down pressure differential. To me it sounds similar to making a claim that frictional forces don't exist because what's really going on is shear stress due to the breaking of the microwelds that form at asperities between two materials in contact. We generalize it and call it friction because its convenient. How is suction different? Going a step further, you could claim that the "pressure gradient" explanation is wrong too, because pressure doesn't actually exist- it's just a macroscopic approximation for interactions between different particles.

The test was poorly worded, it happens.

Last edited by filtherton; 11-07-2007 at 01:55 PM..
filtherton is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:34 PM   #35 (permalink)
I have eaten the slaw
 
inBOIL's Avatar
 
92% The test could use a re-writing for clarity.
inBOIL is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 09:46 PM   #36 (permalink)
Oh dear God he breeded
 
Seer666's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona
370 points for a 74%.
Considering I dropped out in 10th grade and never took a math or science class in my life, I can live with that.
__________________
Bad spellers of the world untie!!!

I am the one you warned me of

I seem to have misplaced the bullet with your name on it, but I have a whole box addressed to occupant.
Seer666 is offline  
 

Tags
aptitude, mechanical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54