Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Life


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2008, 04:06 PM   #41 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Jenna's Avatar
 
Location: Wisconsin
I would have still gone out to parties and drank if my parents had offered it to me. I think approaching the fact of being safe while being out is more appropriate personally. Drinking at home with a few friends never was as appealing as a huge college party.
Jenna is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 04:42 PM   #42 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Perhaps it was designed that way, but I find the first post to be shortsighted and dangerous. It will only lead to binge drinking, which is bad regardless of age. Mixed with irresponsible youngsters, it's a recipe for disaster.

Last year in a Chicago suburb, there was a prom or graduation party thrown by a kid who's parents took this exact stance. They purchased all the alcohol and tried to confiscate all the keys. They missed one set, and two kids died in a car wreck at the foot of their driveway. Those parents are now in jail - and I think they belong there.
Pretty much my sentiment. My child, like many will probably experiment. There's only so much of your child's outside behavior you can control. Hopefully we have armed her with information and good decision making skills. Beyond that, they will do what they do.

However, if I find out that my child was at a house where alcohol or any impairing or illegal substance was provided, I will absolutely prosecute and/or show up on their doorstep. The dangers of accidents, alcohol poisoning, and inappropriate behavior (lowered inhibitions) are too great for immature minds and bodies. It is irresponsible for adults to facilitate such events.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 04:50 PM   #43 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I agree with jenna and otto.

It's much more important to teach your child to be safe regardless of the circumstances.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 05:21 PM   #44 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: LI,NY
Very interesting topic to ponder, being the mother of 2. My parents never drank, or at least not in front of me, and never taught me how to drink responsibly. That was obvious when I went away to college. My first 2 years are a blur. Now, my children see me have a glass of wine or a beer, now and then. I do not hide it from them. But I also do not drink when we are at family parties, if I am the one driving home. My hopes are to teach them how to drink responsibly, no drinking and driving, stay at a friend's house if you cannot drive home, stuff like that. Will I let them have a taste when they are older, but not the legal drinking age? yeah, I probably will. As long as they are with me. I think. I will have to give this more thought as they get older.
__________________
"Toughness is in the soul and spirit, not in muscles." ~Alex Karras
Meditrina is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:31 PM   #45 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: My head.
You all speak of doing something in order to prepare or make a young one responsible but you forget, the reason there is a law in the first place. Think about the argument that you make, "You comply because it's the law, would you have agreed to the law before it was changed?"

There is a phrase, "The Law is THE LAW!!" This simply means that *common sense* a people cannot police themselves!! That's why we have the law, numerous religions and activists who strive to change towards evolution!!

Drugs have remained illegal for long not because we simply like it that way but because (call it puritanical!!) we don't want the future to turn into stoners!! And I know, alcohol has been a fundamental part of the civil society since time immemorial, (that's not an exaggeration, alcohol is important to keep people from rioting!!)

For as long as president after president, activist after activist does not change the law, that will not be because of influence, because we did impeach Clinton who had a lot of influence, it will be because it's the right thing we know to do, until we find out otherwise. That is why THE LAW IS THE LAW, because it's always right.
Xerxys is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:40 PM   #46 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Even without a law, I wouldn't have given my children alcohol until they were adults. Rationality, morality and identity are still forming. Like it or not, young people lack the necessary skills to make the decisions adults are expected to make. This extends to alcohol. If you don't believe me, take a look at drunk driving statistics.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 09:21 PM   #47 (permalink)
Addict
 
guyy's Avatar
 
Location: Cottage Grove, Wisconsin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerxys
That is why THE LAW IS THE LAW, because it's always right.
Hmm, and slavery was the law of the land in many places. Always right? How about Jim Crow? Feudalism?

From the other side, there are laws in areas where people are generally self-policing. I don't think it's laws that keep traffic flowing. (Would you start driving on the left on alternate Tuesdays if there were no law against it?) Or, what keeps you from killing your kids? That it's illegal? Really?

I note that many, if not all, of the examples of the horrors of sub-21 drinking given above are of auto accidents. It's interesting that we can simply bracket the carnage that automobiles produce. Why is drink demonised while autos get a free ride? I'll grant you that a few of the people who died in drunk driving accidents might have had bad things happen to them on the train or waiting for the bus, but by and large, with a better transportation system, there'd be far fewer of these sorts of tragedies.

This is not to deny that people choke on their alcohol induced vomit, die from alcohol poisoning, drunkenly walk into the Mississippi and drown, etc. They do. However, i'm not sure the laws are really helping.
guyy is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 09:41 PM   #48 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Even without a law, I wouldn't have given my children alcohol until they were adults. Rationality, morality and identity are still forming. Like it or not, young people lack the necessary skills to make the decisions adults are expected to make. This extends to alcohol. If you don't believe me, take a look at drunk driving statistics.
So it's the law for selective service, and in some countries mandatory service of armed forces. I'm not so much a fan of the "I can die for my country but I can't have a beer" argument, but it stands in the face of your statement. 18 is an adult, but not adult enough to drink beer.

Shouldn't then by that same rationality, morality, and idenity come into play as well for signing contracts? By your extention 18 year olds should not be allowed to sign binding contracts.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 11:41 PM   #49 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Shit at age 18 I had moved out of the house and was paying my own way through University (well me and a little help from student loans).

Good thing the drinking age in Ontario was 19 (18 across the river in Quebec). I guess we mature faster than they do in San Francisco.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 06:37 AM   #50 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
So it's the law for selective service, and in some countries mandatory service of armed forces. I'm not so much a fan of the "I can die for my country but I can't have a beer" argument, but it stands in the face of your statement. 18 is an adult, but not adult enough to drink beer.

Shouldn't then by that same rationality, morality, and idenity come into play as well for signing contracts? By your extention 18 year olds should not be allowed to sign binding contracts.
"Don't sign contracts and drive". Apples and oranges.

Char, check out drunk driving stats in the US vs. Canada.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:06 AM   #51 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
"Don't sign contracts and drive". Apples and oranges.

Char, check out drunk driving stats in the US vs. Canada.
How is it that it's apples and oranges?

There is a reason that contracts with minors are not legally binding, because basically the reasons you stated.

"Don't sign contracts and drive" is a fallacy you know and understand that.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:08 AM   #52 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
How is it that it's apples and oranges?

There is a reason that contracts with minors are not legally binding, because basically the reasons you stated.

"Don't sign contracts and drive" is a fallacy you know and understand that.
Contracts do not cause inebriation. It's inebriation that sets them apart.

"Don't sign contracts and drive" was meant to illustrate that point; alcohol impairs judgment, contracts do not.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:38 AM   #53 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Contracts do not cause inebriation. It's inebriation that sets them apart.

"Don't sign contracts and drive" was meant to illustrate that point; alcohol impairs judgment, contracts do not.
Alcohol impairs the judgment of adults of any age, the issue of judgment is the judgment to drink to the point it becomes a problem.

If your judgment is poor on drinking, odds are your judgment is poor on signing a contract too.

TBH I'm sort of on your side on this one, mostly because I think for a lot of kids these days 18 is NOT a good time to declare them an adult, they lack the judgment and skills to be called one.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 09:58 AM   #54 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I had no interest in alcohol until the summer following my graduation from High School. I was 18 when I had my first drink and deemed myself responsible enough to handle it. In High School I took my sport very seriously, Swimming. I viewed my body as a tool and didn't have any interest in introducing alcohol, drugs or anything of that nature into it.
I was always the friend who stayed behind to drive my friends home if they had been drinking. Thats just who I was and that was fine, I knew at least one of us from the group was sober and able to take care of people if they needed it. Before going to college my girlfriend Victoria told me I needed to at least experience what it was like being drunk so it wouldn't be a rude awakening at Texas Tech.
My first experience involved wine. She and i went and got a bunch of junk food, we went to her guest house and set up our beds and got ready for a fun night. I had about 2 glasses of red wine and I was pretty out of it. I remember it was a very fun experience and it was very safe. I do remember waking up and puking my guts out into the transhcan nearby (which she strategically placed). I couldn't ask for a better experience to start out with. I woke up without a hangover. My mom and dad knew I didn't have an interest in drinking because I drove my friends home a lot.
I believe a part of me choosing not to drink until I was 18 was a personal choice. While my parents influenced me, they did not put down a law in the house stating that me drinking was unacceptable. My sister is not a big fan of drinking either and shes 22. My parents did not drink in front of me from an early age and while alcohol was in the home it was never worried about. We also went to a Souther Baptist church which as many know does not promote drinking or dancing.
Every set of parents are different but I believe the choice is up to the child and their goals. I was disciplined while doing my sport so that is probably what affected my choice the most. My friends drank and attempted to get me to but I just always said no thanks and it wasn't a problem.
Now when James and I go out, if we're drinking we always decide on a DD before we even leave. We're responsible about it. At Texas A&M they have the safe ride system. Aggies stay up till 3am and will go pick you up from where you are and take you home with no questions. Keeps people safe and thats awesome. I think more schools need to implement that instead of just telling kids to abstain.
Now that I'm 20, I don't feel ashamed to have some wine in front of my parents. I have talked to my dad about drinking and he's been fine with it because he knows I'm responsible. He knows I would not put myself in a bad situation where I'd be driving or be able to be taken advantage of. At home we have a pretty stocked wet bar and its never been a problem. Ultimately drinking or not drinking is a personal choice from your child. You can influence that choice however at the end of the day its their call. My parents also always told me if I needed them to come get me then they would come no questions asked. Which means a lot too.

Last edited by surferlove007; 04-24-2008 at 10:01 AM..
surferlove007 is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 04:22 PM   #55 (permalink)
Insane
 
savmesom11's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Even without a law, I wouldn't have given my children alcohol until they were adults. Rationality, morality and identity are still forming. Like it or not, young people lack the necessary skills to make the decisions adults are expected to make. This extends to alcohol. If you don't believe me, take a look at drunk driving statistics.

Amen will....amen
__________________
* I do not believe that struggles are a sign of life falling apart, but rather a step of life falling into place. *
savmesom11 is offline  
Old 04-25-2008, 02:53 PM   #56 (permalink)
Upright
 
samurai_x44's Avatar
 
Location: Montreal
I'm really surprised by the amount of people who blindly obey the law and using as a justification "it's the law".

Back on topic. I wouldn't provide alcohol for my kids as in buy them alcohol. However, if we(the family) were eating and drinking wine or having a beer during a hot summer day, I wouldn't exclude them (unless they where young <13ish) by not letting them drink alcohol like everyone else. I might dilute their wine a little at first though. So basically I wouldn't put a restriction on alcohol, I would simply make sure that they don't drink too much. When they get older 16ish that responsibility becomes theirs.

As for most people saying that early drinking creates more responsible drinking behavior; I strongly disagree. The only way I see people drink responsibly is by either not liking alcohol or if they do (which is my case) by drinking too much a few times. How else would you know how much is too much without drinking too much at least once.
__________________
everything will be OK in the end.

if it's not OK, it's not the end.
unknown
samurai_x44 is offline  
Old 04-25-2008, 05:38 PM   #57 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai_x44
I'm really surprised by the amount of people who blindly obey the law and using as a justification "it's the law".
Who?
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:01 PM   #58 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Who?
I would guess you. But then again, I do wonder why this doesn't fall under your "civil disobedience" discretion, since well, those are laws also.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:13 PM   #59 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
I would guess you.
I guess people missed post #46.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
But then again, I do wonder why this doesn't fall under your "civil disobedience" discretion, since well, those are laws also.
Civil disobedience isn't about breaking a law for selfish gain. I can't imagine someone having the stones to compare getting a beer after 6th period in high school with equal rights regardless of race.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:17 PM   #60 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I guess people missed post #46.

Civil disobedience isn't about breaking a law for selfish gain. I can't imagine someone having the stones to compare getting a beer after 6th period in high school with equal rights regardless of race.
No, people have "smoke ins" in parks as acts of civil disobedience to state their disapproval to the anti-marijuana laws. The cannibas clubs of the Bay Area also were doing this same kind of civil disobendience until the medical marijuana legalization allowed them more leeway.

Civil disobedience isn't just for equal rights.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:41 PM   #61 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
No, people have "smoke ins" in parks as acts of civil disobedience to state their disapproval to the anti-marijuana laws. The cannibas clubs of the Bay Area also were doing this same kind of civil disobendience until the medical marijuana legalization allowed them more leeway.

Civil disobedience isn't just for equal rights.
No, but it's tolerated for certain things. Things like civil rights. Boozing it up under 21 isn't supported by reason, you see. How can I know that? Why statistics on teenage drunk driving, of course! And let's not have any of the poor arguments about how education would happen if it were legal. As we've seen in this very thread, there are plenty of parents who are willing and able to tutor their children regarding the dangers of drinking and driving, but the statistics remain the same, never the less.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-26-2008, 07:57 AM   #62 (permalink)
sufferable
 
girldetective's Avatar
 
One reason to obey a law is because you and your community probably voted on it. That community may be neighborhood, city, county, state... It was probably voted in as a measure that was looked upon by the most people to bring the greatest good or least damage to the community as a whole. If that law isnt making sense any more or is no longer viable it could be changed through education, and sometimes it works to call attention to your cause through civil disobedience. If you think it would benefit your community to have more drunk kids around, get to your local government offices. Maybe you could hire these kids to obtain sigs for the measure and they could pony up a few $$ on their parent's next run to the liquor store.
__________________
As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons...be cheerful; strive for happiness - Desiderata
girldetective is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 01:25 PM   #63 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia

But it's not safe to assume that your children won't go out and get drunk in uncontrolled environments because they were allowed to drink at home.

Nor do I imagine there are any positive correlations between drinking at home and the avoidance of binge drinking or alcoholism.
You know, you're absolutely right.
Something we seem to lack, so far, is data that CAN be correlated. Otherwise, we're just deciding from gut. So I'd have to rescind my stance till we can find out more about the trends that occur, and perhaps who your kids are.
UKking is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 07:46 PM   #64 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: My head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by guyy
Hmm, and slavery was the law of the land in many places. Always right? How about Jim Crow? Feudalism?

From the other side, there are laws in areas where people are generally self-policing. I don't think it's laws that keep traffic flowing. (Would you start driving on the left on alternate Tuesdays if there were no law against it?) Or, what keeps you from killing your kids? That it's illegal? Really?
OK, I don't drive on the left because first I'll cause an accident or something, because it's illegal never crossed my mind. Just like I wouldn't drive with a permit while the licensed co-driver is wasted, it's perfectly legal, the law only calls for one to have a co-driver, common sense dictates he/she be lucid.

You heard of the phrase, being at the right time doing the right thing at the right place? Well, the law was changed after slavery, never heard of Jim Crow but I bet his LAW's were changed. Slavery served a terrible purpose, a bad and inhuman means to an end, but now we know better, don't enslave!!

The bible's old testament says an eye for an eye, but in the new testament it says be forgiving, (I'm agnostic by the way) things change because we are a learning species, we have to obey the law, It's always right. It serves a purpose for the now, it also supplements growth. I am against some laws, but the law says, we can change these laws, huh, well what do you know, I believe that society is not a programming meant to control, but to supplement longevity of life, hence my deep faith in the >SYSTEM<!!!!!!!!
Xerxys is offline  
Old 07-15-2008, 12:12 PM   #65 (permalink)
Upright
 
Underage drinking

Underage drinking is the fault of the parent... or is it?

In my opinion - it is the fault of the parent for letting minors drink alcohol - but what if they are completely oblivious to it and the child does it to rebel/out of their own choice.

People regularly blame parents for not bringing up their kids properly and allowing them to drink but children will "rebel" as a chance to get back at their parents because they think that they are hard done by or as result of peer pressure.

On the other hand - if a kid isn't brought up to fully understand the risk of underage drinking and the effects it has on the liver, as well as having proper ground rules in place, then surely it is the responsibility of the parents?


Should get a few conflicts of opinion.
__________________
Will trade my brazzers account or premium rapidshare account for a Tram-Pararam.com account.

ASAP.
Wehtam is offline  
Old 07-15-2008, 12:18 PM   #66 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
If the teenager is a minor, the parents are responsible. [In Ontario, you can be an adult (18) but under the legal drinking age (19).] I don't necessarily think the parents are to blame.

Even at most ages of teendom, people are making their own choices, regardless of parenting. Even kids of "perfect" parents I'm sure are engaging in this practice. However, the parents are ultimately responsible for their minor children and should do the best they can to prevent this.

Much of that is having instilled morals and an understanding of consequences of various activities. Other things include practical issues such as curfew, checking in, knowing where they are and who they're with.

Parents can only do so much, but they should do what is expected of them.

Teenagers can generally suck.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

Tags
alcohol, kids, parents, providing, underage


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360