Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > Tilted Fun Zone


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-21-2006, 01:28 AM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
I saw this Hummer in Vancouver

I was on holliday in Vancouver and i saw this Hummer,

optilt is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 03:50 AM   #2 (permalink)
Psycho
 
I don't get it. Don't lots of companies do this? promotional vehicle?
I'm in Calgary and lots of companies/bars have hummers (or other expensive vehicles) with advertising all over them
Temporary_User is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 09:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
breid's Avatar
 
Location: NOVA sCOTIA
I like it. Anyone have a big bottle opener?
breid is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 09:06 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Carno's Avatar
 
Fitting that a shitty beer would be plastered on a shitty vehicle.
Carno is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 09:17 AM   #5 (permalink)
Searching for the perfect brew!
 
Brewmaniac's Avatar
 
Can you say Tax right off!
__________________
"That's a joke... I say, that's a joke, son"
Brewmaniac is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 09:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Reminds me of the Oscar Meyer Weiner Mobile we ran into during my vacation in Oregon.
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 03:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carno
Fitting that a shitty beer would be plastered on a shitty vehicle.
Can't afford one, huh?

__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 05:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
i see quite a few like that around town. I'll snap some shots, and post em as i find them.
Leto is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 05:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
If it's not a hummer it's a mini, smartcar or a VW Bug.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 06:44 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Francisco
Needs phatter rims!
n0nsensical is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 06:59 AM   #11 (permalink)
Unencapsulated
 
JustJess's Avatar
 
Location: Kittyville
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
Can't afford one, huh?

Wouldn't want to! What a !@#$@#$@#^$ waste of money and gas. I hate them. Frankly, everytime I see one (in QUEENS, mind you, where they're oh-so-necessary) I want to take a baseball bat to it. It sparks a lot of outrage and anger in me.

So... they have made it clear: I guess I don't want to be drinking Coronas either!
__________________
My heart knows me better than I know myself, so I'm gonna let it do all the talkin'.
JustJess is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 06:59 AM   #12 (permalink)
Free Mars!
 
feelgood's Avatar
 
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
Fuck Hummers!

I endorse other types of hummers
__________________
Looking out the window, that's an act of war. Staring at my shoes, that's an act of war. Committing an act of war? Oh you better believe that's an act of war
feelgood is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 08:34 AM   #13 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Hummers, and other SUVs, are a "fuck you" to everyone else on the road.

They increase their own driver's visibility by reducing the visibility of everyone else.

They decrease the safety of everyone on the road, but bring a feeling of safety to the drivers (just a feeling -- because death rates in SUVs are no better than death rates in other cars. Roll overs are dangerous.)

Driving an SUV is no different than embezzeling 1 penny from everyone in Canada. It is a distributed crime.

If SUVs paid for the reduced safety of everyone else on the road, it would be one thing. But as it stands, they take away from everyone else's safety and ability to see without recompensating others for it.

And that is why SUVs suck.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 08:45 AM   #14 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
Good point Yakk. I would go further. I remember back in the early 1990's that everybody started to buy minivans. I, in my sizable, yet lower profile LeBaron sedan, or smaller Tercel, was unable to view the road ahead when I was surrounded by Caravans, Astros, Safaris and the ilk.

But even though minivans were just as big, or just as gas-guzzling (except for the magic wagons - the Voyagers/Caravans didn't even get a gas-guzzler sur-tax probably because they were basically K-cars) they never suffered the same rap as SUVs.

I'm actually looking at a CRV at the moment. I need some space, but still a car like vehicle. The cross-overs look good. The new CRV is lower and wider. But then there is the new Ford Edge too.

Last edited by Leto; 10-23-2006 at 08:47 AM..
Leto is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 04:12 PM   #15 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
There's something I hate worse than promo Hummers:




WTF?!
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 12:29 PM   #16 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Leto, that is possibly because Minivans where almost entirely purchased by people with large families. And many people are willing to be generous to families -- to "give" them the credit to pay for the extra LOS problems.

But, even Minivans should pay for their Line of Sight blocking, and the reduced safety of everyone else on the road.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 05:37 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
Hummers alongside the Don Valley Parkway, usually two advertising Menupalace.com, today there were three (sorry about the quality, I took it with my phone, while driving on the parkway):


Last edited by Leto; 10-31-2006 at 07:39 AM..
Leto is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:23 PM   #18 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
eh, Hummers suck.

http://www.ihumpedyourhummer.com
Shauk is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:33 PM   #19 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
I much prefer hummers with something like this on them.

filtherton is offline  
Old 10-31-2006, 07:32 AM   #20 (permalink)
Upright
 
I hate those billboard trucks, can't they just pay a compay to put them on the side of their trucks? Or use a regular one and I don't know. . . ship stuff!
Mauser is offline  
Old 10-31-2006, 07:56 AM   #21 (permalink)
Unencapsulated
 
JustJess's Avatar
 
Location: Kittyville
Filtherton -that's hysterical! I think that's just perfect.
__________________
My heart knows me better than I know myself, so I'm gonna let it do all the talkin'.
JustJess is offline  
Old 10-31-2006, 08:16 AM   #22 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Just goes to show that different strokes for different folks.

Nothing wrong with them if you 4x4 and use it as it is supposed to be used for. I now if I had one, it would be off road alot. Not that I would like the gas, but I think if I had one, I could afford the gas too.
__________________
Go hard or go home;
Just don't go home hard.

canucker is offline  
Old 10-31-2006, 02:18 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Amaras's Avatar
 
Location: At my daughter's beck and call.
Hey, I got a hummer once in Vancouver.
__________________
Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.
-Noam Chomsky
Love is a verb, not a noun.
-My Mom
The function of genius is to furnish cretins with ideas twenty years later.
-Louis Aragon, "La Porte-plume," Traite du style, 1928
Amaras is offline  
Old 10-31-2006, 10:15 PM   #24 (permalink)
Boo
Leave me alone!
 
Boo's Avatar
 
Location: Alaska, USA
Back button again. I must be getting old.
__________________
Back button again, I must be getting old.
Boo is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:54 PM   #25 (permalink)
Tilted
 
The H1 is a sweet ride. I think the H2 is built on a Yukon chasis, so why not hate Yukons too?
billyeggs is offline  
Old 11-13-2006, 12:13 AM   #26 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Francisco
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyeggs
The H1 is a sweet ride. I think the H2 is built on a Yukon chasis, so why not hate Yukons too?
I think we do.
n0nsensical is offline  
Old 11-13-2006, 03:27 AM   #27 (permalink)
Sue
Teufel Hunden's Freundin
 
Sue's Avatar
 
Location: Westminster, CO
Hummers and every other SUV out there annoys the shit outta me. I just wanna slash all the tires and put them down to our midsize/compact car level. Dontcha just love the headlights blinding you in your side and rearview mirrors?
__________________
Teg yw edrych tuag adref.
Sue is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 12:30 PM   #28 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Vancouver Island BC
Just another

S tupid
U seless
V ehicle
__________________
Book 'em Danno
glasscutter43 is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 01:18 PM   #29 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
I always love threads like this. It makes me laugh at people who think that if someone doesn't believe the way they do, then the original thinker must be stupid. Just because YOU don't see a use to a vehicle, and just because YOU cansee a reason to buy a minivan, doesn't mean EVERYONE that has one is stupid and senseless. I have a Jeep cherokee, and I use it for what it was made for, and I also own a minivan, and I use IT for what it was designed for, so why does that make me stupid?...simple... IT DOESN'T...it makes me a person who buys a vehicle for the use it is intended for. Try to fit a family of 6 comfortably in a Mini Cooper..... If it was only my wife and me, then SURE, I would buy something smaller.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 02:35 PM   #30 (permalink)
paranoid
 
Silvy's Avatar
 
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
I always love threads like this. It makes me laugh at people who think that if someone doesn't believe the way they do, then the original thinker must be stupid. Just because YOU don't see a use to a vehicle, and just because YOU cansee a reason to buy a minivan, doesn't mean EVERYONE that has one is stupid and senseless.
Deltona Couple, you're right! Absolutely right!

But, this thread is not discussing the owners of the vehicles as much as the vehicles themselves.

The larger SUV's ARE blocking other's views on the road. They DO decrease overall road safety because line-of-sight problems, impact increase in case of collisions, etc. What most of the posters in this thread seem to agree on is that SUV's (Hummers, Cherokee, etc) annoy others because of these reasons.
(In addition, they're less environmentally friendly, which also seems to annoy some non-drivers).

But, the thing that annoys me (and probably others too) the most, is the fact that few SUV-owners actually use the vehicle what it is intended for. Apparently YOU do, fine. Keep using it. But most SUV's I see driving around carry one person (perhaps a few kids on the way to school or such) and NO luggage / cargo / trailer / whatever. Seems that SUV's are more used for some mis-guided status icon than anything else.

(Oh, and if someone tows a boat trailer twice a year does not make it right that he/she should annoy traffic the rest of the year.)

And I'm not too sure about your argument. We're discussing the irritation caused by overly large personal vehicles. I don't care if the Hummer driver behind me is using it "for the right purpose"; he's still blinding me. Annoying the sh*t out of me.
From experience the SUV's rarely carry the load they were designed for, doubling the annoyance these vehicles give me.
If EVERYBODY used the cars to their design potential and mostly for that, people would not be so annoyed by them.
Compare with trucks: they're slow, they block the view immensely and in a collision they're the biggest bang. But they're not so annoying, you know why? Because they're necessary, and we all know that. Also they're rarely used for fun, status or pushing everybody ahead of them out of their lane.
And, at least around here, their speed is limited for those reasons.

Your argument does make sense in that "you shouldn't judge a book by its cover" and scolding individual owners/drivers is not fair. But in general terms, it can be said that SUV's are not fun for everybody, and that, on average, the SUV's are more of a nuiscance than a blessing.

Luckily there are not many SUV's around where I live, so the actual annoyance is minimal, but the point still stands.
__________________
"Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace. "
- Murphy MacManus (Boondock Saints)
Silvy is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 05:46 AM   #31 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvy
Deltona Couple, you're right! Absolutely right!

But, this thread is not discussing the owners of the vehicles as much as the vehicles themselves.

The larger SUV's ARE blocking other's views on the road. They DO decrease overall road safety because line-of-sight problems, impact increase in case of collisions, etc. What most of the posters in this thread seem to agree on is that SUV's (Hummers, Cherokee, etc) annoy others because of these reasons.
(In addition, they're less environmentally friendly, which also seems to annoy some non-drivers).

But, the thing that annoys me (and probably others too) the most, is the fact that few SUV-owners actually use the vehicle what it is intended for. Apparently YOU do, fine. Keep using it. But most SUV's I see driving around carry one person (perhaps a few kids on the way to school or such) and NO luggage / cargo / trailer / whatever. Seems that SUV's are more used for some mis-guided status icon than anything else.

(Oh, and if someone tows a boat trailer twice a year does not make it right that he/she should annoy traffic the rest of the year.)

And I'm not too sure about your argument. We're discussing the irritation caused by overly large personal vehicles. I don't care if the Hummer driver behind me is using it "for the right purpose"; he's still blinding me. Annoying the sh*t out of me.
From experience the SUV's rarely carry the load they were designed for, doubling the annoyance these vehicles give me.
If EVERYBODY used the cars to their design potential and mostly for that, people would not be so annoyed by them.
Compare with trucks: they're slow, they block the view immensely and in a collision they're the biggest bang. But they're not so annoying, you know why? Because they're necessary, and we all know that. Also they're rarely used for fun, status or pushing everybody ahead of them out of their lane.
And, at least around here, their speed is limited for those reasons.

Your argument does make sense in that "you shouldn't judge a book by its cover" and scolding individual owners/drivers is not fair. But in general terms, it can be said that SUV's are not fun for everybody, and that, on average, the SUV's are more of a nuiscance than a blessing.

Luckily there are not many SUV's around where I live, so the actual annoyance is minimal, but the point still stands.
OK but in the same sense, how do people KNOW that just because you see a single driver, does it mean he is ALWAYS the only one in the SUV. I drive mine by myself all the time, but STILL use it with a full load when needed. And in the sense of blocking the view of other drivers, so do the big hauling trucks as well. If I can't see around it, then i follow a little further back, or I take my time and go around it. I don't see that the vehicle itself is the problem, as much as the drivers on the road in ALL vehicles. If you are careful, and watch your driving, then MOST accidents can be avoided, or atleast significantly reduce the effect. I am not trying to excuse SUV drivers, but I could also in the same reasoning complain about the motorcycles and small cars that whip in and out of traffic, cutting off other drivers and causing just as much trouble on the road. I don't think we should just zero in on a specific vehicle, but in the drivers on the road as a whole.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 06:43 AM   #32 (permalink)
paranoid
 
Silvy's Avatar
 
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
OK but in the same sense, how do people KNOW that just because you see a single driver, does it mean he is ALWAYS the only one in the SUV. I drive mine by myself all the time, but STILL use it with a full load when needed.
You're quite right there. It's not possible to know what a single driver does with his vehicle on average. But from my experience (the following figures are simplified):
For every 100 SUV encounteres, I see maybe 1 being used to it's potential (i.e. the use is 'justified'). This is everyday.
I can then conclude that 98%* of SUV trips do not require an SUV to do.

So if (and give me this assumption for now) SUV endanger others, or hinder their driving, wouldn't it be logical for people to be annoyed at "all those SUV" drivers? The main point is, that SUV-trips are largely unnecessary, so their effect on the rest of traffic is also largely unnecessary. And because of the quite large percentage of unnecessary* SUV trips, people get annoyed with them in general.

(Compare this with cab drivers: there are many taxi drivers that are pushy, annoying and arrogant. They annoy me. But the percentage of annoying taxi drivers is not high enough for me to consider all taxi drivers annoying until proven innocent)

Finally, I honestly do believe that more than 75% of the SUV drivers around here never use the car for something that requires an SUV. They consider it a status symbol and only want a bigger car than their neighbour. The huge popularity of luxury SUV's supports this notion.

I'll admit though, that jealousy can be a 'helpful' factor in the SUV generalization, but it is not the root cause.

* say, 1% of the trips is SUV-potential, + the return trip leaves 98% of the trips not requiring the use of an SUV.
**unnecessary trips are of course as perceived by other drivers.

I've left the actual "do SUV's endanger or hinder traffic" discussion out of this post. But you're point regarding the small cars and motorcycles, I agree: there are certain classes of drivers that are just as dangerous or more than the average SUV driver. Please don't get me started on that! I'm can't always keep my cool when discussing wreckless drivers. (SUV, truck, motorcycle or otherwise)
When I see a stuntdriver on the road, I sometimes silently (or not so silently) encourage him to drive of a cliff. And I keep getting the song "If I had a rocket launcher" in my head. No idea where that thought was going
__________________
"Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace. "
- Murphy MacManus (Boondock Saints)
Silvy is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:56 PM   #33 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvy
You're quite right there. It's not possible to know what a single driver does with his vehicle on average. But from my experience (the following figures are simplified):
For every 100 SUV encounteres, I see maybe 1 being used to it's potential (i.e. the use is 'justified'). This is everyday.
I can then conclude that 98%* of SUV trips do not require an SUV to do.

So if (and give me this assumption for now) SUV endanger others, or hinder their driving, wouldn't it be logical for people to be annoyed at "all those SUV" drivers? The main point is, that SUV-trips are largely unnecessary, so their effect on the rest of traffic is also largely unnecessary. And because of the quite large percentage of unnecessary* SUV trips, people get annoyed with them in general.

(Compare this with cab drivers: there are many taxi drivers that are pushy, annoying and arrogant. They annoy me. But the percentage of annoying taxi drivers is not high enough for me to consider all taxi drivers annoying until proven innocent)

Finally, I honestly do believe that more than 75% of the SUV drivers around here never use the car for something that requires an SUV. They consider it a status symbol and only want a bigger car than their neighbour. The huge popularity of luxury SUV's supports this notion.

I'll admit though, that jealousy can be a 'helpful' factor in the SUV generalization, but it is not the root cause.

* say, 1% of the trips is SUV-potential, + the return trip leaves 98% of the trips not requiring the use of an SUV.
**unnecessary trips are of course as perceived by other drivers.

I've left the actual "do SUV's endanger or hinder traffic" discussion out of this post. But you're point regarding the small cars and motorcycles, I agree: there are certain classes of drivers that are just as dangerous or more than the average SUV driver. Please don't get me started on that! I'm can't always keep my cool when discussing wreckless drivers. (SUV, truck, motorcycle or otherwise)
When I see a stuntdriver on the road, I sometimes silently (or not so silently) encourage him to drive of a cliff. And I keep getting the song "If I had a rocket launcher" in my head. No idea where that thought was going
So, am I correct in assuming that you feel that SUV's should never be on the road unless it is being used in the way it were designed? If that is the case, what should those of us that use it say once a month do? buy another "econo" car to drive?
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 03:09 PM   #34 (permalink)
paranoid
 
Silvy's Avatar
 
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
So, am I correct in assuming that you feel that SUV's should never be on the road unless it is being used in the way it were designed? If that is the case, what should those of us that use it say once a month do? buy another "econo" car to drive?
Personally, yes, something like that.
Again, I'm under the impression that SUV's compromise road safety unnecessarily.
Why should the local bank director's wife bring the kids to school in a SUV? It doesn't help her, it most certainly doesn't help me. The only thing it accomplishes is that she does not have to be seen in a "econo" car.

Of course if you're say, in the construction business, regularly moving heavy loads, I wouldn't expect you to buy another car.

The situation you describe lies somewhere in between, where a SUV is required some of the time, but not all of the time.
I don't know where to draw that line, but there are 3 possible scenario's:

1) Heavy lifting, offroading, etc for most of the time: Buy an SUV and use it always, no sweat
2) not so much SUV-worthy use: Buy an SUV and a "econo" car.
3) don't ever use an SUV for what it was meant to do: Don't buy an SUV.

Now, I think most would agree with scenario's 1 and 3 (given the assumption, once again that overall road safety is better off without SUV's). Scenario #2 is where the problem lies. Obviously not everyone is financially capable of buying and maintaining an extra "econo" car (or an extra SUV, whichever way you look at it). I don't know the exact economics, but I imagine that an SUV is more expensive in daily use. So at some low-usage point it likely becomes more economic to buy an additional regular "econo" car, or buy a single "econo" car and rent/borrow an SUV when it is necessary.
(And if/when it makes financial sense, and is better for traffic safety: what's keeping people from doing it?)

When a combined SUV / econo car scenario is not a financially feasible option (which I can quite understand), then don't buy a BMW, Mercedes or Hummer. Buy a decent pickup, Jeep or whatever. The expensive SUV's with all the options, make any economic argument very unbelievable.

Once again, if the bank managers, lawyers, rap stars and other hotshots of this world (scenario #3), would stop driving SUV's, the annoyance level would lower very quickly. They're very expensive in purchase, insurance and use (jealousy), they're dangerous to other traffic (danger), and they're a hindrance to other traffic (annoyance). These three combined with the perceived low total usefullness of the vehicles makes people very annoyed at them.

Man, I should stop writing such long posts, it becomes annoying to preview

Oh, btw, mind you: I live in Europe. Cars are a status symbol here, but I imagine the "I got me a truck" thing triggers some raw American frontier type feeling, making the SUV / larger pickups feel more of a basic necessity to americans.
Also, we see a that a rather large percentage of SUV's are the luxury variety, not being used for many occupants or heavy loads.
__________________
"Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace. "
- Murphy MacManus (Boondock Saints)
Silvy is offline  
 

Tags
hummer, vancouver


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360