Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2005, 08:49 AM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Janey's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincentt
"wait it out?!?!" are you crazy?

One person already got shot, how many more have to get hit before you can take him out?

Bullets can travel long distances, there is no way to keep everyone safe from a mad man firing randomly.

Note: the police didn't barge into a room and shoot him either. He must have been outside firing at police! A totally aggressive move.

Maybe the police should have just all gone home, maybe he would have gotten bored with trying to kill people and put his gun down...

yup and nooo... I'm not crazy. what was the difference between 6:20 pm and let's say 6:30 pm, when the whole thing was going on since 3:50??? they already had waited, so what in the final exchange caused the police to decide, "hey, this is the final exchange, let's shoot him now"

and yes, he was firing at the police, and yes bullets travel a long distance. But again, (and I assure you I am not crazy, because the cops had already WAITED IT OUT FOR 1.5 HOURS) something prompted the police to abandon their strategy at 6:20.
Janey is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 09:15 AM   #42 (permalink)
Chef in Training
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janey
something prompted the police to abandon their strategy at 6:20.
-Gunshots- would prompt return fire, and end the waiting. You'll notice that there were multiple exchanges. The only reason they were waiting was because they missed him those first two times. Once again, a man advancing upon your position firing, holding a baby or not, will be shot at until he is no longer moving.
__________________
"We are supposed to be masters of space, but we cant even line up our shoes?"

One life, one chance, one opportunity.
Ripsaw is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 09:50 AM   #43 (permalink)
Junkie
 
fhqwhgads's Avatar
 
Janey- I don't know the specifics about this particular case, but I have been on a dozen or so active hostage/barricade situations myself, so I have a feeling for how these things go. These things are very dynamic...they are always changing depending on the behavior of the suspect.

I was a few hours into a suicidal barricade one night a few years ago. Our QRT team had already tried to evacuate everyone in the neighboring apartments. Now we're a few hours into the negotiation, and our dispatchers tell us that they just received a phone call from the apartment next door to the target apartment, wondering why all the police cars were outside. Our QRT team had knocked on that door several times, but apparently they had slept through the knocking. Now our team has to re-approach the target house in order to get those neighbors to safety. Luckily, we were able to keep the suspect on the phone while our team safely got the neighbors out.

From what I understand from the article, there was a team of officers that were trying to get some neighbors to safety when the suspect began to engage them. They didn't "abandon" their strategy... the situation changed.
fhqwhgads is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 10:33 AM   #44 (permalink)
Insane
 
ophelia783's Avatar
 
Location: West Virginia
Instead of thinking "what kind of police force would fire at a baby," think instead, "what kind of father would use his own child as a shield?"

The police were acting in order to protect their lives', and the lives of the public. The suspect thought of his child merely as a pawn, and an easy way out. What would've happened if they hadn't shot? He either would've killed them, or would've gotten away, or would've (most likely) killed his child anyway.

Just some food for thought.
__________________
~*~* He with a sharp tongue slits his own throat *~*~
ophelia783 is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 12:47 PM   #45 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Janey's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by fhqwhgads
Janey- I don't know the specifics about this particular case, but I have been on a dozen or so active hostage/barricade situations myself, so I have a feeling for how these things go. These things are very dynamic...they are always changing depending on the behavior of the suspect.

I was a few hours into a suicidal barricade one night a few years ago. Our QRT team had already tried to evacuate everyone in the neighboring apartments. Now we're a few hours into the negotiation, and our dispatchers tell us that they just received a phone call from the apartment next door to the target apartment, wondering why all the police cars were outside. Our QRT team had knocked on that door several times, but apparently they had slept through the knocking. Now our team has to re-approach the target house in order to get those neighbors to safety. Luckily, we were able to keep the suspect on the phone while our team safely got the neighbors out.

From what I understand from the article, there was a team of officers that were trying to get some neighbors to safety when the suspect began to engage them. They didn't "abandon" their strategy... the situation changed.
thanks, your response is exactly what I was looking for, not the automatic ranting at people who would dare to question police tactics.

I recognize that the situation is/was dynamic and that police would never want to kill a baby. I also recognize that there are many unanswered questions, and that it may be comming out that the baby may have been shot by it's own father.

What I would like is that when I question what occurred, I am not automatically consigned to a bleedingheart liberal softie category and ranted at. On the contrary, asking the hard questions takes me out of this softie category.


I appreciate your input...

edit: I also want to add that it is important for people reading this to know that the police are not a hardened lot of stormtroopers or ethnic cleansers who take pleasure in harming children. Every decision is a hard one and to lose a young innocent like in this case will cause a lot of soul-searching without our help.

Last edited by Janey; 07-12-2005 at 12:50 PM..
Janey is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:20 PM   #46 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Central Wisconsin
I can't imagine the pain this has caused for so many. The mother is probably beating herself up for leaving the child with her father. She knew he was depressed, but probably thought he would never hurt his own daughter. The police officers are sure to be agonizing over the bullet that killed the poor girl and will never be sure who's bullet actually hit her. Then you have all the people that witnessed this. It is truly tragic when a parent puts their own child in that situation. The pain and hopelessness he must have felt prior to this incident must have been unbearable. Why else would a parent flip out like that. I can't imagine the state of mind he must have been in.
getwonk'd is offline  
Old 07-13-2005, 10:01 AM   #47 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mephisto
However, there is NO EXCUSE for police to open fire on someone in these circumstances. Whilst I don't necessarily believe the figure of "300 shots fired", what on Earth were these people thinking when they fired at this man and his hostage?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
However, I have to ask how endangered these officers felt that they had to just blow the baby away to get to the man.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qtpye4u84
Thats sad. They should of waited tell they had a clear shot, but I guess they did what they had to do.
If you're wondering what they were thinking or what they felt, the answer to the first was "Officer down" and the second, that they had to stop this guy before anyone else was killed. In a situation in which a suspect is firing at officers and civilians, the only clear shot is the immediate one that can take the suspect down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho Dad
Tasers. I saw one used across the street from me a while back. While I was sceptical of the amount that my small town city government spent on them at first, I was sold after seeing one in use. Given that the situation was put down without anyone in the neighborhood getting hurt or any property damage I can see their use now.
I've been hit with a police-issue stungun and pepper spray on a bet, and they did jack shit. the only way anyone found to drop me with the stungun (no head/groin shots allowed) was to position the electrodes on opposite sides of my spine. I said some nice, firendly things to accompany the shin kick when I finally stood back up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_
Maybe if they armed the police with .22s they would have fewer fatalities?
It's possible that they would have fewer fatalities to armed suspects who shot first, and to armored targets, but we'd also have a lot more deaths among officers who had to sit back and watch their ammo do jack shit to a lightly armored target. If you're talking about the FN 5.7x28 round (5.7mm is almost identical to .22), it has superior performance to many 9mm rounds and wouldn't result in any lesss fatalities.

The issue that I have with your response is that it seems you're concerned with police killing people who pose an immediate threat to ther lives. That's the only situation in which they're allowed to shoot in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lindalove
I don't think anyone has said/implied that the police shouldn't have shot back at the man.. but surely they could have shot him in the leg or even the arm to basically shoot the gun out of his hand.. instead of shooting the child?
The only hits that can reliably incapacitate a human are center-of-mass (reflexive neurocirculatory shock reuslts in instant incapacitation ~95% of the time on first shots and ~98% if a second shot is required,) and the head. Limb shots, in addition to being nearly impossible to achieve, do nothing to incapacitate the suspect and also risk a shot missing or passing through. They only work in movies and games.

If you want to learn more about how bullets actually kill/incapacitate, search the Weaponry forum for a thread entitled "Hydrostatic shock."
MSD is offline  
 

Tags
daughter, gunfight, man, shield


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360