02-24-2005, 09:45 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: North of the 50th Parallel
|
Canadian Parliament Votes Against Support for Bush' Missile Defense Program
I just watched our Prime Minister on TV saying that our parliament has just Voted against support of the American Missile Defense program, (No news in Print yet though).
Was this a good decision? PM Paul Martin said that Canada's sovereignty must be protected and therefore our airspace is OURS to protect. It defensive action is to be taken "over" Canada we must be the ones to initiate it. If you find this in print please give us a link or correct me as I have only seen this once early this morning.
__________________
Living on the edge of sanity Last edited by RCAlyra2004; 02-24-2005 at 10:16 AM.. Reason: Spelling |
02-24-2005, 09:52 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
at the CBC site:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ada050224.html It may not be an easy decision, but then, when you have to contend with the American gov't, no decisions are easy.. they are they elephant to our mice... !~~~~~~~~~ OTTAWA - Canada has said no to the U.S. missile defence program, Prime Minister Paul Martin announced Thursday. INDEPTH: Ballistic missile defence Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew in the Commons, Thursday. The prime minister said the decision was made following extensive discussions with Foreign Affairs and National Defence. "Let me be clear: we respect the right of the United States to defend itself and its people," said Martin. "Indeed, we will continue to work in partnership with our southern neighbours on the common defence of North America and on continental security." Earlier, Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew told the House of Commons about the prime minister's decision, which Pettigrew said was based on policy, and not emotion. Pettigrew said he informed U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of Canada's decision on Tuesday during NATO meetings in Brussels. "Of course, the U.S. is disappointed. They recognize and respect our decision," said Pettigrew. NDP member of Parliament Alexa McDonough praised the decision. Canada's new ambassador to Washington, Frank McKenna, said earlier this week that Canada is already taking part in the program through Norad. And the outgoing U.S. ambassador to Canada, Paul Cellucci, said Americans don't understand why Canada doesn't want to be responsible for its own sovereignty on the issue. In the months leading up to the decision, Martin had repeatedly said he believed Canada should be at the table when it comes to any discussion of the defence of North America. |
02-24-2005, 09:59 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
Tilted
Location: reno,nv
|
Quote:
kevin
__________________
And in knowing that you know nothing, that makes you the smartest of all. - Socrates (469 BC - 399 BC) |
|
02-24-2005, 10:36 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Tilted F*ckhead
Location: New Jersey
|
They tried this years back as well just after the cold war. The US was still paranoid about Russia launching missles from the arctic, or traveling over the arctic to get to the US since the boarder would be the least patrolled area. Well the US's plan was to shoot the missles/planes down. That's fine, but the debris would have fallen on the busiest parts of Canada.
I completely support my government in this decision.
__________________
Through counter-intelligence, it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble makers, and neutralize them. |
02-24-2005, 10:50 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Insane
|
Quote:
They are powerful enough. The US government doesn't need our government's help with anything.
__________________
"You looked at me as if I was eating runny eggs in slow motion." - Gord Downie of The Tragically Hip |
|
02-24-2005, 11:06 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Registered User
|
Well if anything, The United States needs to have a defensive procedure in place. Not so much for the USSR, but because of China and N. Korea.
But, if they don't want the defense in Canada, then the U.S should put it in its own territory. As far as it goes living in the United States, I want a missle defense program. I want my safty insured, or at least it I would be a lot safer than if there was nothing in place. WIth N. Korea and China building up arms, there is already and arms race going on. Let's not slack off now and allow a hostile country to try and disrupt the world now. |
02-24-2005, 12:09 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Auckland
|
ID have to say, that as it stands the missile deffence system is not ready. all tests in which the enemy missiles trajectory was not well known has misserably failed. now i dont think in a real situation anyone will know the missile trajectory.
But as you said, something is better than nothing, if only a token gesture
__________________
I am Hanabal, Phear my elephants |
02-24-2005, 12:18 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Tilted
Location: Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
Let me understand what you're saying: That you'd rather have a plane successfully drop whatever type of bomb (from convential to nuclear) for sure into whatever city or target in the US, then have the debris from that wreckage fall into Canada? Be aware that a nuclear warhead wouldn't even detonate if it just fell; granted, it would give off radiation, but that's a lot less damage then a detonation. It's a sketchy issue, I'll agree, and if Canada doesn't want the US screwing with their airspace, I think we should respect that, at least during testing. However, if it comes time for the missiles to start flying (and I hope that that time never, ever comes), I hope that Canada might let us defend over thier airspace. Personally, though, I'm against the whole thing, unless we can, for sure, prevent every missile from coming through. And I realize that's the goal, but progress really isn't being made in that direction. So I guess it's more like "I'm not sure where I stand". |
|
02-24-2005, 12:40 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
|
Quote:
OK, please, don't take my opinion as gospel, because I'm Canadian and not fully up to speed on the issue, BUT.... The issue isn't one of defence in our borders, as I see it. If push came to shove we would be right next to the Americans, you're our closest neighbors and allies. The issue is more one of dropping a ton of money into a system that barely works on a good day, with a booster start and a tail wind. Other Canadians may disagree with me. But in my personal opinion, if the Americans came to us with a system that worked MOST of the time (hell, perfection not an issue, I'll take most of the time), I would vote to support it.
__________________
"Whoever you are, go out into the evening,
leaving your room, of which you know each bit; your house is the last before the infinite, whoever you are." |
|
02-24-2005, 01:26 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Banned
|
What a concidence, I was just talking to my MP at lunch about this, that and the missle defense program. It really makes no difference as we are in it already. Regardless of wether we commit further, the 'mercans will not wait until missiles are over thier soil before attempting to shoot them down, they are going to take pot shots at them as they pass over Canada.
|
02-24-2005, 06:59 PM | #12 (permalink) |
I read your emails.
Location: earth
|
I've wrote a response to this thread about 4 times now, each time deleting it because it was it would probably taken as bashing. so i'll add that the plan would probably never work anyway, and that lets hope a missile never gets launched. bravo martin. odd that he got some balls.
|
02-24-2005, 09:02 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junk
|
I'll bet Chretien is pissed now that Martin hasn't failed miserably. Up until last summer, I couldn't stand Martin or the thieving Liberals. But something is happening. I'm starting to think Martin might actually be the real deal and give a shit more about his country than his ego. Certainly more than that asshole Chretien. But I'm not holding my breath. His turn to bury Chretien not with politics like Chretien but with a legacy, that seemingly has forgone Chretien, at least in a positive light, as a man of vision and direction for a liar and thief.
Let's see. Martin stands up to the U.S missile program and is cheered. Sides with gay marriage and equality. Impressive. Seriously looking at decriminalizing pot outright. Bonus. And I think is trying to be a leader rather than a follower, or at least a wagging dog on a tail. Stephen Harper. Has the bible in his back pocket, speaks of change for the equality and betterrment of all while, discriminates against gays and gay marriage. Saw great things for him as a player but now he just looks like an under experienced micro manager. Lord help me, I'm turning into a liberal.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard. |
02-24-2005, 10:25 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
|
Just keep in mind that martin is doing alot of this to please the other parties so he can stay in power. Though i must say i enjoying this minority government thing.
__________________
"Love is a perky elf dancing a merry little jig and then suddenly he turns on you with a miniature machine gun" -Matt Groening |
02-25-2005, 09:36 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: nyc
|
Quote:
Additionally I would be more comfortable with this program if the USA were also doing more to stop the threat of nuclear missels by working with the global community to reduce the number of missels that all countries (including the USA) have. |
|
02-25-2005, 09:47 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Her Jay
Location: Ontario for now....
|
Quote:
I understand the minority government is playing a big factor in his decisions, but hell at least he's putting his country first, even if he does have to watch himself with the opposition waiting in the wings to bring down the Liberals.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder |
|
02-25-2005, 09:54 AM | #17 (permalink) | ||
Crazy
Location: Top of the World, Mom!
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Live life like you're gonna die, beacause you're gonna! - William Shatner. |
||
02-25-2005, 10:24 AM | #18 (permalink) | ||
Registered User
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-25-2005, 11:04 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
Location: Grantville, Pa
|
The US HAS assumed absolute control over Canadian Airspace, when we deem it necessary.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...BNStory/Front/ Quote:
|
|
02-25-2005, 02:40 PM | #20 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
Bingo. need anybody say more??? |
|
02-25-2005, 03:52 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Her Jay
Location: Ontario for now....
|
They've assumed absolute control, when they deem necessary, and just how do they assume control over a countries airspace? Seems like it's a big problem to the US for any other country in the world to have a mind of their own, they just want a bunch of puppets running around or something. At least that's the way it appears to me.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder |
02-25-2005, 04:33 PM | #22 (permalink) |
undead
Location: Duisburg, Germany
|
USA did something like that before, they don't care for other nations airspaces and sovereignty.
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death — Albert Einstein |
02-25-2005, 04:45 PM | #23 (permalink) | |||
Poison
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't have any problems with the american people..But the leaders of america thinking that they can do whatever they want wherever they want..That's what i have a problem with.
__________________
"To win any battle, you must fight as if you were already dead" -Musashi Last edited by IC3; 02-25-2005 at 04:54 PM.. |
|||
02-25-2005, 04:53 PM | #24 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: Where the music's loudest
|
Quote:
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom. |
|
02-26-2005, 07:51 AM | #26 (permalink) | |
Her Jay
Location: Ontario for now....
|
Quote:
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder |
|
02-26-2005, 11:15 AM | #27 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: Top of the World, Mom!
|
Quote:
But you never know, mayby he's just covering up an attack on Yurop!!!
__________________
Live life like you're gonna die, beacause you're gonna! - William Shatner. |
|
Tags |
bush, canadian, defense, missile, parliament, program, support, votes |
|
|