Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2005, 09:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: North of the 50th Parallel
Canadian Parliament Votes Against Support for Bush' Missile Defense Program

I just watched our Prime Minister on TV saying that our parliament has just Voted against support of the American Missile Defense program, (No news in Print yet though).

Was this a good decision?

PM Paul Martin said that Canada's sovereignty must be protected and therefore our airspace is OURS to protect. It defensive action is to be taken "over" Canada we must be the ones to initiate it.

If you find this in print please give us a link or correct me as I have only seen this once early this morning.
__________________
Living on the edge of sanity

Last edited by RCAlyra2004; 02-24-2005 at 10:16 AM.. Reason: Spelling
RCAlyra2004 is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 09:52 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Janey's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
at the CBC site:

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ada050224.html

It may not be an easy decision, but then, when you have to contend with the American gov't, no decisions are easy.. they are they elephant to our mice...

!~~~~~~~~~

OTTAWA - Canada has said no to the U.S. missile defence program, Prime Minister Paul Martin announced Thursday.


INDEPTH: Ballistic missile defence


Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew in the Commons, Thursday.
The prime minister said the decision was made following extensive discussions with Foreign Affairs and National Defence.

"Let me be clear: we respect the right of the United States to defend itself and its people," said Martin.

"Indeed, we will continue to work in partnership with our southern neighbours on the common defence of North America and on continental security."

Earlier, Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew told the House of Commons about the prime minister's decision, which Pettigrew said was based on policy, and not emotion.

Pettigrew said he informed U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of Canada's decision on Tuesday during NATO meetings in Brussels.

"Of course, the U.S. is disappointed. They recognize and respect our decision," said Pettigrew.

NDP member of Parliament Alexa McDonough praised the decision.

Canada's new ambassador to Washington, Frank McKenna, said earlier this week that Canada is already taking part in the program through Norad.

And the outgoing U.S. ambassador to Canada, Paul Cellucci, said Americans don't understand why Canada doesn't want to be responsible for its own sovereignty on the issue.

In the months leading up to the decision, Martin had repeatedly said he believed Canada should be at the table when it comes to any discussion of the defence of North America.
Janey is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 09:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tilted
 
kebo's Avatar
 
Location: reno,nv
Quote:
PM Paul partime said that Canada's sovereignty must be protected and therefore our airspace is OURS to protect. It defensive action is to be taken "over" Canada we must be the ones to initiate it.
I think if Canada waits to take defensive action against missiles then so be it, but if it waits until the missiles are coming, it might be too late.
kevin
__________________
And in knowing that you know nothing, that makes you the smartest of all.
- Socrates (469 BC - 399 BC)
kebo is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 10:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Top of the World, Mom!
Well done Canada, but what does it matter? It's like North Korea voting about American Missile defense...:?
__________________
Live life like you're gonna die, beacause you're gonna!

- William Shatner.
Thermopyle is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 10:36 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tilted F*ckhead
 
Church's Avatar
 
Location: New Jersey
They tried this years back as well just after the cold war. The US was still paranoid about Russia launching missles from the arctic, or traveling over the arctic to get to the US since the boarder would be the least patrolled area. Well the US's plan was to shoot the missles/planes down. That's fine, but the debris would have fallen on the busiest parts of Canada.

I completely support my government in this decision.
__________________
Through counter-intelligence, it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble makers, and neutralize them.
Church is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 10:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
trache's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thermopyle
Well done Canada, but what does it matter? It's like North Korea voting about American Missile defense...:?
Because, imo, the more missles the US has at to use at their disposal, the more power they can push on others.

They are powerful enough. The US government doesn't need our government's help with anything.
__________________
"You looked at me as if I was eating runny eggs in slow motion." - Gord Downie of The Tragically Hip
trache is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 11:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Well if anything, The United States needs to have a defensive procedure in place. Not so much for the USSR, but because of China and N. Korea.

But, if they don't want the defense in Canada, then the U.S should put it in its own territory. As far as it goes living in the United States, I want a missle defense program. I want my safty insured, or at least it I would be a lot safer than if there was nothing in place. WIth N. Korea and China building up arms, there is already and arms race going on. Let's not slack off now and allow a hostile country to try and disrupt the world now.
wnker85 is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 12:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Hanabal's Avatar
 
Location: Auckland
ID have to say, that as it stands the missile deffence system is not ready. all tests in which the enemy missiles trajectory was not well known has misserably failed. now i dont think in a real situation anyone will know the missile trajectory.

But as you said, something is better than nothing, if only a token gesture
__________________
I am Hanabal, Phear my elephants
Hanabal is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 12:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Quote:
Originally Posted by Church
They tried this years back as well just after the cold war. The US was still paranoid about Russia launching missles from the arctic, or traveling over the arctic to get to the US since the boarder would be the least patrolled area. Well the US's plan was to shoot the missles/planes down. That's fine, but the debris would have fallen on the busiest parts of Canada.

I completely support my government in this decision.

Let me understand what you're saying: That you'd rather have a plane successfully drop whatever type of bomb (from convential to nuclear) for sure into whatever city or target in the US, then have the debris from that wreckage fall into Canada? Be aware that a nuclear warhead wouldn't even detonate if it just fell; granted, it would give off radiation, but that's a lot less damage then a detonation.

It's a sketchy issue, I'll agree, and if Canada doesn't want the US screwing with their airspace, I think we should respect that, at least during testing. However, if it comes time for the missiles to start flying (and I hope that that time never, ever comes), I hope that Canada might let us defend over thier airspace.

Personally, though, I'm against the whole thing, unless we can, for sure, prevent every missile from coming through. And I realize that's the goal, but progress really isn't being made in that direction. So I guess it's more like "I'm not sure where I stand".
TheFrogel is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 12:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Antikarma's Avatar
 
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrogel
It's a sketchy issue, I'll agree, and if Canada doesn't want the US screwing with their airspace, I think we should respect that, at least during testing. However, if it comes time for the missiles to start flying (and I hope that that time never, ever comes), I hope that Canada might let us defend over thier airspace.

OK, please, don't take my opinion as gospel, because I'm Canadian and not fully up to speed on the issue, BUT....

The issue isn't one of defence in our borders, as I see it. If push came to shove we would be right next to the Americans, you're our closest neighbors and allies. The issue is more one of dropping a ton of money into a system that barely works on a good day, with a booster start and a tail wind.

Other Canadians may disagree with me. But in my personal opinion, if the Americans came to us with a system that worked MOST of the time (hell, perfection not an issue, I'll take most of the time), I would vote to support it.
__________________
"Whoever you are, go out into the evening,
leaving your room, of which you know each bit;
your house is the last before the infinite,
whoever you are."
Antikarma is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 01:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
What a concidence, I was just talking to my MP at lunch about this, that and the missle defense program. It really makes no difference as we are in it already. Regardless of wether we commit further, the 'mercans will not wait until missiles are over thier soil before attempting to shoot them down, they are going to take pot shots at them as they pass over Canada.
Powderedmaggot is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 06:59 PM   #12 (permalink)
I read your emails.
 
canuckguy's Avatar
 
Location: earth
I've wrote a response to this thread about 4 times now, each time deleting it because it was it would probably taken as bashing. so i'll add that the plan would probably never work anyway, and that lets hope a missile never gets launched. bravo martin. odd that he got some balls.
canuckguy is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 09:02 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junk
 
I'll bet Chretien is pissed now that Martin hasn't failed miserably. Up until last summer, I couldn't stand Martin or the thieving Liberals. But something is happening. I'm starting to think Martin might actually be the real deal and give a shit more about his country than his ego. Certainly more than that asshole Chretien. But I'm not holding my breath. His turn to bury Chretien not with politics like Chretien but with a legacy, that seemingly has forgone Chretien, at least in a positive light, as a man of vision and direction for a liar and thief.

Let's see. Martin stands up to the U.S missile program and is cheered. Sides with gay marriage and equality. Impressive. Seriously looking at decriminalizing pot outright. Bonus. And I think is trying to be a leader rather than a follower, or at least a wagging dog on a tail.

Stephen Harper. Has the bible in his back pocket, speaks of change for the equality and betterrment of all while, discriminates against gays and gay marriage. Saw great things for him as a player but now he just looks like an under experienced micro manager.

Lord help me, I'm turning into a liberal.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.
OFKU0 is offline  
Old 02-24-2005, 10:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
Crazy
 
munchen's Avatar
 
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Just keep in mind that martin is doing alot of this to please the other parties so he can stay in power. Though i must say i enjoying this minority government thing.
__________________
"Love is a perky elf dancing a merry little jig and then suddenly he turns on you with a miniature machine gun" -Matt Groening
munchen is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 09:36 AM   #15 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: nyc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanabal
ID have to say, that as it stands the missile deffence system is not ready. all tests in which the enemy missiles trajectory was not well known has misserably failed. now i dont think in a real situation anyone will know the missile trajectory.

But as you said, something is better than nothing, if only a token gesture
I would have no problem with this statement if developing the missel defense program which has so far been a miserable failure was free, but it's costing billions of dollars and the majority of scientests and engineers whose opinions i've read seem to think that the program is unlikly to be successful anytime soon. I'm not comfortable with so much money being invested in a program with such a poor record or chance of success.

Additionally I would be more comfortable with this program if the USA were also doing more to stop the threat of nuclear missels by working with the global community to reduce the number of missels that all countries (including the USA) have.
brianna is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 09:47 AM   #16 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by OFKU0
I'll bet Chretien is pissed now that Martin hasn't failed miserably. Up until last summer, I couldn't stand Martin or the thieving Liberals. But something is happening. I'm starting to think Martin might actually be the real deal and give a shit more about his country than his ego. Certainly more than that asshole Chretien. But I'm not holding my breath. His turn to bury Chretien not with politics like Chretien but with a legacy, that seemingly has forgone Chretien, at least in a positive light, as a man of vision and direction for a liar and thief.

Let's see. Martin stands up to the U.S missile program and is cheered. Sides with gay marriage and equality. Impressive. Seriously looking at decriminalizing pot outright. Bonus. And I think is trying to be a leader rather than a follower, or at least a wagging dog on a tail.

Stephen Harper. Has the bible in his back pocket, speaks of change for the equality and betterrment of all while, discriminates against gays and gay marriage. Saw great things for him as a player but now he just looks like an under experienced micro manager.

Lord help me, I'm turning into a liberal.
I know the feeling, I'm still not the biggest fan of Mr. Martin, hell I didn't vote for him last election, but he is changing my opinion of him slowly. I'm impressed he's actually showing some stones and not just following the US and Bushy.

I understand the minority government is playing a big factor in his decisions, but hell at least he's putting his country first, even if he does have to watch himself with the opposition waiting in the wings to bring down the Liberals.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 09:54 AM   #17 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Top of the World, Mom!
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnker85
Well if anything, The United States needs to have a defensive procedure in place. Not so much for the USSR, but because of China and N. Korea.

But, if they don't want the defense in Canada, then the U.S should put it in its own territory. As far as it goes living in the United States, I want a missle defense program. I want my safty insured, or at least it I would be a lot safer than if there was nothing in place. WIth N. Korea and China building up arms, there is already and arms race going on. Let's not slack off now and allow a hostile country to try and disrupt the world now.
But the thing is, if China or N. Korea would (let's forgett the why here) like to nuke the USA and if they succeeded to launch a missile and get it to hit the USA, the retaliation from US would be massiv; complete destruction of N. Korea. If they would use their nukes on anybody they would be stuffed with plutonium. Not even wacko Kim-Il-Sun would want that. So they can really use their nukes without committing suicide. Now, I think the real nuclear threat to the US are smuggled-in bombs by terrorists/rouge nations.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wnker85
WIth N. Korea and China building up arms, there is already and arms race going on.
It might just happen that the US may trigger the arm race with its missile defense. It would be better to work for a nuclear-free planet that building new min-nukes and missile defenses instead.
__________________
Live life like you're gonna die, beacause you're gonna!

- William Shatner.
Thermopyle is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 10:24 AM   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thermopyle
But the thing is, if China or N. Korea would (let's forgett the why here) like to nuke the USA and if they succeeded to launch a missile and get it to hit the USA, the retaliation from US would be massiv; complete destruction of N. Korea. If they would use their nukes on anybody they would be stuffed with plutonium. Not even wacko Kim-Il-Sun would want that. So they can really use their nukes without committing suicide. Now, I think the real nuclear threat to the US are smuggled-in bombs by terrorists/rouge nations.
I agree, but I also think that the Military needs to be ready for both types of bombs. Our issue now is that we are all set up to fight another World War and not gurilles ( i know i spelt that one worng). We should be able to do both. That way we are safer than we are now. Adressing one type and forgeting about the other does no good in the long run. Too bad our military leaders tend to wear blinders.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Thermopyle
It might just happen that the US may trigger the arm race with its missile defense. It would be better to work for a nuclear-free planet that building new min-nukes and missile defenses instead.
I whole-heartly agree. But, I think like Reagan did. So, you can have an Idea on where I was coming from.
wnker85 is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 11:04 AM   #19 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
The US HAS assumed absolute control over Canadian Airspace, when we deem it necessary.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...BNStory/Front/

Quote:
Paul Cellucci, the U.S. ambassador, made the remarks just after Mr. Martin officially announced Canada would not join the controversial missile-defence shield.

“We will deploy,” Mr. Cellucci said. “We will defend North America.

“We simply cannot understand why Canada would in effect give up its sovereignty, its seat at the table, to decide what to do about a missile that might be coming towards Canada.”
In other words, "F you Canada, and F what you think. We'll do what we want."
Superbelt is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 02:40 PM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Janey's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superbelt
The US HAS assumed absolute control over Canadian Airspace, when we deem it necessary.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...BNStory/Front/



In other words, "F you Canada, and F what you think. We'll do what we want."

Bingo. need anybody say more???
Janey is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 03:52 PM   #21 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
They've assumed absolute control, when they deem necessary, and just how do they assume control over a countries airspace? Seems like it's a big problem to the US for any other country in the world to have a mind of their own, they just want a bunch of puppets running around or something. At least that's the way it appears to me.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 04:33 PM   #22 (permalink)
undead
 
Pacifier's Avatar
 
Location: Duisburg, Germany
USA did something like that before, they don't care for other nations airspaces and sovereignty.
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein
Pacifier is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 04:45 PM   #23 (permalink)
IC3
Poison
 
IC3's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
The US HAS assumed absolute control over Canadian Airspace, when we deem it necessary.
That makes my blood boil for 1 reason..what silentjay said...

Quote:
Seems like it's a big problem to the US for any other country in the world to have a mind of their own.
I have no problem with the US using Canadian airspace to intercept an enemy missile..But what i do have a problem with is, The US being told that Canada is to be in on the decision of anything happening in canadian airspace..and this is the reply we get (Taken from the news article posted above)

Quote:
the American ambassador said the country had given up its right to be involved in any such decision
WTF

I don't have any problems with the american people..But the leaders of america thinking that they can do whatever they want wherever they want..That's what i have a problem with.
__________________
"To win any battle, you must fight as if you were already dead" -Musashi

Last edited by IC3; 02-25-2005 at 04:54 PM..
IC3 is offline  
Old 02-25-2005, 04:53 PM   #24 (permalink)
Addict
 
CandleInTheDark's Avatar
 
Location: Where the music's loudest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thermopyle
Well done Canada, but what does it matter? It's like North Korea voting about American Missile defense...:?
The American government wants Canada onboard so they can say to other countries "Hey it's not just us wanting a missile defense system; even reasonable, moderate Canada is onboard!"
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom.
CandleInTheDark is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 07:07 AM   #25 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Top of the World, Mom!
Whatever, at least they're not starting another war...again.
__________________
Live life like you're gonna die, beacause you're gonna!

- William Shatner.
Thermopyle is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 07:51 AM   #26 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thermopyle
Whatever, at least they're not starting another war...again.
Wait for it, I'm sure they will again before Bushy's second term ends.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 11:15 AM   #27 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Top of the World, Mom!
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
Wait for it, I'm sure they will again before Bushy's second term ends.
heheh, I'm not sure anymore. Bush has just been in europe on a "let's be friends again"-tour and he seems to revaluate his own previous agressive war style. They actually talking about diplomaty when it comes to Iran.

But you never know, mayby he's just covering up an attack on Yurop!!!
__________________
Live life like you're gonna die, beacause you're gonna!

- William Shatner.
Thermopyle is offline  
 

Tags
bush, canadian, defense, missile, parliament, program, support, votes

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360