09-09-2004, 09:35 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: work
|
How do we protect children?
I just had lunch at my grandmother's house. While I am there, she tells me the story of what happened earlier today.
A man offers to give a young girl (8-9?) a ride to where she was going. The girl gets freaked out and runs up to grandma's neighbor to get away from this guy. The neighbor asks the guy if there is anything he can help him with, the guy speeds off. Neighbor calls the police and gives description of guy and license plate number. Police pull guy over not too far away, run check, find out he is a pedofile from 1985. As it turns out, it is not illegal for him to offer a young girl a ride. The police regret to inform them there is nothing they can do. I realize the police have to enforce the law, and I am not downing them in any way, but what is protecting the kids from people like this? Is it that they might get in real big trouble if they get caught with a dead kid in the trunk and can't get a good lawyer? Our system really needs to be fixed. My thought was 6-8 months of legal vigilante justice. What are your thoughts? |
09-09-2004, 10:07 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
follower of the child's crusade?
|
Quote:
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate, for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain without being uncovered." The Gospel of Thomas |
|
09-09-2004, 10:10 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
Why is it not illegal?
Is he a registered sex offender? What rights do they or don't they have? But what scares me, that it the police have no ability to do anything it will turn ito vigilante justice.
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
09-09-2004, 10:13 AM | #5 (permalink) |
follower of the child's crusade?
|
the problem with vigilante justice is that its aim isnt so good.
In the town I went to university in, the local paper published the address of a paedophile that they said was living in the community. Problem was, the guy didnt live there anymore, a young family with two kids had lived there for a year. Some vigilante burned the house down and the family was killed.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate, for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain without being uncovered." The Gospel of Thomas |
09-09-2004, 10:19 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
sex offenders have the same rights as everyone else (in the systems eyes) except for the fact that they have to register for 10 years( I think) and they have to inform the sheriff's department of where they live and have to get permission to leave the state. vigilante justice can be an equal danger to society. for instance, the neighbors kick the guys ass and they end up in jail for trying "to protect" the child. there are loopholes in the system that need to be filled up but on the same note you can't get too drastic and end up on with a witch hunt. |
|
09-09-2004, 10:26 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: work
|
Indiana’s sex and violent offender registration law initially required people convicted of specific sex offenses after June 30, 1994 and those convicted of certain violent offenses after June 30, 1998 to register with local law enforcement authorities in the communities where they intended to live, work, or study. Effective July 1, 2001, however, these dates were removed from Indiana’s sex and violent offender registration law.
Consequently, offenders who may now be required to register because specific registration dates have been removed from the law may previously have been told that they did not need to register. Evidently he forgot to register. |
09-09-2004, 10:29 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: work
|
The thing that gets me is that nothing can be done until someone's child is scarred for life. And only then if he doesn't get a good lawyer and get off with home detention or something. Meanwile, the kid is fucked up forever. That is my point.
|
09-09-2004, 10:31 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
I would think that having a law, prohibiting a convicted sex offender from offering "rides" to 9 year old girls, would be more effective than forcing them to register for a database that rarely gets checked.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
|
09-09-2004, 02:28 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Tilted
Location: In My Pants
|
Quote:
I find it equally frustrating the police really can't do anything until something bad has happened, but the alternative to locking people up we think *might* do something bad is far more frightening to me. |
|
09-09-2004, 02:32 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
09-09-2004, 11:05 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: Las Vegas
|
How you can protect your children is exactly how she WAS protected. Raise her right to know that it's not OK to take rides with strangers.
Sure, it's a fucked up situation, but it really bothers me that the first thought is to look to outsiders for overzealous protection when good parenting is really the answer. We need better fences to stop our kids from drowning... No, you need to watch your kids and teach them not to swim without supervision. We need ritalin to help our kids pay attention... No, you need to lay down the law and take control of your kid's attitude (and accept that kids like to run around and make noise). We need more money for schools so our kids can learn to read... No, you need to take time out of your schedule to read to your kid and be a part of his/her education. We need the cops to arrest ex-cons who have committed no crime... No, you need to teach your kid how to avoid such dangerous situations. Because as you have seen, cops won't/can't do it. It's very hard for cops to preemtively fight crime. But her parents, on the other hand, had the opportunity to take a preemtive measure to help their daughter, and their good parenting probably saved her life.
__________________
"If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go!" - Mark Twain Last edited by CoachAlan; 09-09-2004 at 11:08 PM.. Reason: added clarity |
09-09-2004, 11:32 PM | #16 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: I think my horns are coming out
|
Quote:
OMF Minority Report crazyness. |
|
09-10-2004, 12:14 AM | #17 (permalink) |
Guest
|
Common sense would tell us his intentions were evil, but nothing happened, and in the sometimes twisted eyes of the law, no harm no foul.... that sucks. Being a registered sex offender doesn't create immediate guilt either.
As far as a solution? I'm a fan of vigilante justice. I'm also a fan of castration in most cases where pedophilia is involved. Problem is no matter how many times or how long some of these animals are imprisoned for, they don't seem to get it... a little bit of violent retibution goes a long way. |
09-10-2004, 05:31 AM | #18 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: work
|
I agree with everything you said, Coach. I am not a fan of parenting with drugs or government provided common sense. But my question is, what if noone was around for the girl to run to? What if the guy had the balls to get out and run her down? That takes the good parenting out of the equation.
I am not advocating beating the hell out of a guy who drives by and happens to look in the direction of children playing. I am saying that when a convicted pedophile stops to offer a young girl a ride, he probably isn't just doing it to be nice. |
09-10-2004, 10:15 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
|
I agree with Coach.
Education is the answer. The kid was trained well and ran. If the kid was allowed to put herself in a situation where there was no place to run, that is also bad parenting. Parents are ultimately responsible for their children until their children are capable of making informed, intelligent decisions on their own. Over-reaction in favor of "protecting the children" is a classic example of how to take rights away from citizens.
__________________
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones." -- John Cage (1912 - 1992) |
09-10-2004, 10:31 AM | #21 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Yep, if history is any indicator, the kid is likely to become a molester too, in which case we should just beat the shit out of him right after he is molested. 'Cause beating the shit out of molesters before they actually molest is what some of us here seem to be advocating. |
|
09-10-2004, 12:16 PM | #22 (permalink) |
Warrior Smith
Location: missouri
|
sometimes vigilantism can go too far- it seems like the question here is whether sex offenders, specificly pedophiles, get better? do they deserve to live among the rest of us who do not jerk off to 10 year olds? I am not a parrent, but belive that with the commision of some crimes you forfiet certain rights- in this case, I know that I would not want the guy in my neighborhood, whether or not I had kids- of course that begs the question, what about his rights- has he not payed a debt to society- well in some cases maybe the debt has been payed, but this is one crime that it seems, is a symptom of someone that is permanently broken- so why waste taxpayer dollars trying to fix him- bullets are cheaper, and he will never create another victim, nor perpetuate the cycle that created him..............
__________________
Thought the harder, Heart the bolder, Mood the more as our might lessens |
09-10-2004, 12:29 PM | #23 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
|
|
09-10-2004, 07:36 PM | #24 (permalink) |
Warrior Smith
Location: missouri
|
true, but it all depends on what line they cross- I don't advocate the killing of people who are broken, and do not hurt anyone, rather, those who are broken, and have already hurt someone, in a horrible way, and are highly likely to repeat the process.
__________________
Thought the harder, Heart the bolder, Mood the more as our might lessens |
09-10-2004, 08:00 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Warrior Smith
Location: missouri
|
to interject some data into the discussion, I did a google search for recitivism rates (repeat offences) of child molesters- and was surprised at the rates- depending on where you get your stats from, the rate is between 13 and 45 percent - ie that percentage of child molesters repeat the same type of crime, and are caught and convicted- much lower than many people seem to think- I always heard much bigger numbers, and have seen them bantered about by politicians- one article (the only one I could find, anywhere, that lists a recitivism rate this high, with no support or citation) on the issue of chemical castration in california, quoted a number higher than 80%- so the question becomes do you want to take even a small chance that a pedo will reoffend, rather than the idea that most of them do- personally, this is a knee jerk issue for me, and I feel that many others feel the same way- it is natural to want to lash out at those that theaten your kids- and child molesters are SUCH a big threat- so in final analysis, my feelings pretty much stay the same, though I was suprised that the recidivism rate was so low- what do you guys think about the issue in light of the stats?
__________________
Thought the harder, Heart the bolder, Mood the more as our might lessens |
09-10-2004, 08:22 PM | #26 (permalink) |
Filling the Void.
Location: California
|
That's really sad and scary. I remember when I was just going into high school, I was walking home on one of my first days of school and some guy in a tinted-window black car pulled over and asked me if I wanted a ride. Talk about scary. I just ignored him and kept walking as quickly as possible.
|
Tags |
children, protect |
|
|