Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-21-2004, 06:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
First Same Sex Divorce

Now they really *are* equal...

LINK

Quote:
Now it's divorce, same-sex style
Split believed to be a Canada first
Separated 5 days after marriage


TRACEY TYLER
LEGAL AFFAIRS REPORTER

A Toronto couple is seeking what is believed to be Canada's first same-sex divorce.

The women, known only as M.M. and J.H., tied the knot on June 18, 2003, a week after the Ontario Court of Appeal legalized same-sex marriage, but separated five days later.

They had been a couple for more than five years, said Julie Hannaford, a lawyer representing J.H.

"This is the first same-sex divorce case in Canada to our knowledge," Martha McCarthy, a Toronto family lawyer, says in a divorce petition filed on behalf of M.M.

The petition, filed in the Superior Court of Justice last month, promises to add a new dimension to the prickly legal debate over same-sex marriage, which is heading to a hearing in the Supreme Court of Canada this fall.

While courts in three provinces and the Yukon have ruled that the freedom of gays and lesbians to marry is guaranteed by the Charter of Rights, the Divorce Act hasn't been amended to apply to same sex couples.

But M.M. and J.H. want the same divorce rights other couples have.

"Same-sex couples are entitled to the equal respect, recognition and benefit of the law, including all family-law rights and obligations guaranteed to heterosexual couples," M.M. says in supporting court documents.

She and her lawyer are asking the court to grant the divorce and issue an order that the definition of "spouse" under the Divorce Act is unconstitutional and offensive to their equality rights under the Charter. The act defines "spouse" as "of a man or woman who are married to each other."

Hannaford says her client also wants out of the marriage but will be putting forward different grounds.

M.M. cites separation and says there is no possibility of reconciliation. The couple signed a separation agreement on April 30. Other grounds for divorce in Canada are adultery and cruelty.

Lawyers for the federal government asked the court to defer the case until the Supreme Court rules on its reference involving the constitutionality of same-sex marriage. But Madam Justice Ruth Mesbur set a strict schedule of trial-management conferences through the summer and listed the divorce motion for Sept. 13.

On June 17, Mesbur also imposed a sweeping publication ban on the identities of M.M. and J.H., ordering no reference be made to their names, ages, occupations, addresses or other identifying characteristics.

M.M. has "serious concerns about embarrassment and emotional distress as a result of the publication of her identity and does not wish for her personal life to become known to her professional colleagues," McCarthy said in court documents.

"There is a certain stigma associated with being ... the first gay or lesbian couple to divorce," the documents said, noting the case "will likely fuel further public debate."

Individuals seeking divorce are normally required to state their names on their court petition, but Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure allow for an exception "when necessary in the interest of justice."

It's necessary in this case because M.M. "will suffer irreparable harm" and be undermined professionally if identified, McCarthy said. J.H. consented to the ban.

Hannaford and McCarthy say their clients didn't set out to reform the law by deliberately entering into a quickie marriage.

"It's a marriage that didn't work out," McCarthy said, "just like marriages of straight people."
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:18 AM   #2 (permalink)
Insane
 
Why is this a suprise? Just because you're not straight doesn't mean you're perfect. Not all relationships work out.
Trisk is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Who said it was a suprise?
__________________
You don't like my point of view..but im insane
Cowman is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
All hail the Mountain King
 
the_marq's Avatar
 
Location: Black Mesa
Kind if a non-issue if you ask me. The media is all over it as it's the first "Gay Divorce" but it's not that big of a deal.

I have to wonder if the anti-gay camp is going to jump on this or just (wisely) keep quiet.
__________________
The Truth:

Johnny Cash could have kicked Bruce Lee's ass if he wanted to.

#3 in a series
the_marq is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:47 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
more than 50 percent of marriages end in divorce so it was sort of a forgone conclusion that some gay marriages would also end in divorces.

Who honestly cares.... one more couple who got married that shouldn't have... it's the people not their sexual persuasion that caused the divorce..
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
maleficent is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
I agree that this is a non-issue and am not surprised at all.

I think it is newsworthy in its novelty as the first...
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
I'm baaaaack!
 
I think what makes it newsworthy is how fast it happened. Only 5 days afterword.

A lot of people are going to look at this and try to use it as an example of why they shouldn't be allowed to marry- because they do not take the union as sacred as do others. If they do, it would be a joke- many straight marriages end the same way, some sooner.

Just my thoughts on how people might react to this. This has nothign to do with what I feel, which borders on indifference.
__________________
You don't know from fun.
Rubyee is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:38 AM   #8 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Santa Monica - the festering wound called LA
I find it rather ironic that they separated 5 days after marriage...

... after being in a relationship for 5 years

perhaps because they rushed into marriage as soon as it was available to them? (7 days)

If you havent thought through the kind of effect something like marriage will have on a relationship and then you go ahead and do it anyway, you are asking for a disaster like this.

In addition to Rubyee, I think it would be more than a joke. Hetero couples get married for far worse reasons - by and large - than gay couples.

Although I'm still sure someone will enter a homosexual relationship for money through marriage sometime in the future, I can only hope it doesnt get blown out of proportion...

Kinda like this.
__________________
"I want something good to die for
To make it beautiful to live.
I want a new mistake, lose is more than hesitate."

~Queens of the Stone Age - Go with the Flow
vidocq is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:45 AM   #9 (permalink)
BFG Builder
 
Location: University of Maryland
Given Britney Spears can have a marriage that lasts less than 24 hours, I don't really see the big deal here. How long is it gonna be before gay marriage is as unremarkable to the media as it is to me?
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, you must be having an orgasm.
DelayedReaction is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
I think it's great as an example of my personal belief:

the media will report anything, and make it seem like it's important.
analog is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 08:00 AM   #11 (permalink)
Fly em straight!
 
water_boy1999's Avatar
 
Location: Above and Beyond
This thread got me to thinking about a few things.

I am not married, nor have I ever been, but I know that in our quest to find equality of the sexes, divorce courts in no way practice in the equality of a man and woman when it comes to splitting up. You all hear the stories of how a man loses his house and has to pay more than his fair share of support for the woman. Not saying this is true in all cases, but in general, men have had the short end of the stick.

Now, what happens with same sex marraiges? This brings up a whole new set of rules that need to be applied when a couple splits up, or new rules if they have adopted and one party is seeking custody of said child. It seems kind of ironic to me that the only equality that can be reached in a divorce court is because a same sex marraige is ending. I dunno, just rambling now.....
__________________
Doh!!!!


-Homer Simpson
water_boy1999 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 08:15 AM   #12 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Traditionally "Men get the short end of the stick" because in "traditional" marriages men are the greater bread-winner.

Women's roles as housemaker and child rearer have a value that the court recognizes and they are compensated accordingly... Some men think this is a rip-off because they worked hard for their money and posessions and all the woman did was sit at home...

As for same sex divorce... I would expect it would play out like any seperation without a prenuptual... 50/50 split of the assets.


I was thinking the same thing about the speed of the seperation, 5 days, and how this might be used against the cause... In the end, there are a lot of straight couples who do the same. If anything this just underscores that Same Sex Marriages are no different than Straight Marriages...

People are the same wherever you go.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 08:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
Runt
 
Location: Denver
The whole thing is not newsworthy IMHO. Anyhow, isn't it technically an annulment not a divorce?
__________________
<--The great infidel-->
Polyphobic is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 08:43 AM   #14 (permalink)
whoopity doo
 
Bobaphat's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
This is just more proof that homosexuals have no respect for the sanctity or marriage! Unlike we the straight community who give it the respect it deserves!

please note sarcasm
__________________
--size matters not-- yoda
Bobaphat is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 09:58 AM   #15 (permalink)
PIKE!
 
ibis's Avatar
 
Just a matter of time.
ibis is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 01:52 PM   #16 (permalink)
Smithers, release the hounds
 
ironman's Avatar
 
Location: Guatemala, Guatemala
Who will keep the children?
__________________
If I agreed with you weŽd both be wrong
ironman is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 02:59 PM   #17 (permalink)
In Your Dreams
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Location: City of Lights
I may be really cynical but....

it just seems like two people who wanted their 15 minutes of fame.. and decided to get it by demanding the Divorce Act be changed. For a couple that's together for five years, why would they divorce after 5 days? Seems a bit odd (although yeah, I'm sure it can happen for true reasons). I dunno.. just sounds like someone thought 'hey, this gay marriage thing is making a lot of news, lets be the first to start the gay divorce issue'.

I can't pull out any facts that completely back that up (the lawyer's comments kinda help, though).. it's just a feeling I got reading it.
Latch is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:59 PM   #18 (permalink)
on fire
 
animosity's Avatar
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
Quote:
Originally posted by water_boy1999
This thread got me to thinking about a few things.

I am not married, nor have I ever been, but I know that in our quest to find equality of the sexes, divorce courts in no way practice in the equality of a man and woman when it comes to splitting up. You all hear the stories of how a man loses his house and has to pay more than his fair share of support for the woman. Not saying this is true in all cases, but in general, men have had the short end of the stick.

Now, what happens with same sex marraiges? This brings up a whole new set of rules that need to be applied when a couple splits up, or new rules if they have adopted and one party is seeking custody of said child. It seems kind of ironic to me that the only equality that can be reached in a divorce court is because a same sex marraige is ending. I dunno, just rambling now.....


very good point...

I could be wrong, I'm just typing as I think but I think the reason that men get the short end of the stick is because men are just tired of it all and want out, women, being masters of manipulating men, take advantage of this.

"why go and ruin a perfectly good relationship by getting married?" -Joe Rogan
animosity is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 04:08 PM   #19 (permalink)
Apocalypse Nerd
 
Astrocloud's Avatar
 
How did I know that when you said "Same sex divorce" that it would be two women breaking it off?
Astrocloud is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
Insane
 
assilem's Avatar
 
Location: Eternity
I think it just goes to show you that there are greater threats to marriage and the family than gay marriage. I think Bush has his head so far up his ass on this gay marriage thing that he can probably taste his tonsils. And I voted for the man.

Commence the booing and hissing...wait for it…now.
__________________
The mother of mankind, what time his pride
Had cast him out from Heaven, with all his host
Of rebel Angels
assilem is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:23 PM   #21 (permalink)
Junk
 
The part that peeves me is that although I support gay unions, partnerships, marriages, whatever,... is that these people seemingly have the right of privacy that normally isn't accorded to others in traditional marriages.

If I am someone of some notoriety and am in the midst of a divorce, I highly doubt that my identity would be protected in the media. So why is theirs? Because they are gay? Big fucking deal. These people fight to be treated as equal to everyone else then yet are shielded because of what? Their gayness? So much for equality.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.

Last edited by OFKU0; 07-21-2004 at 06:26 PM..
OFKU0 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:22 PM   #22 (permalink)
Insane
 
The reason men usually get the short end of the stick in divorces is because a lot of people think that a child's rightful place is with his mother. If the mother is deemed unfit, however, the mother has to pay child support and the father takes the children.
It doesn't have anything to do with lazy men wanting out or the manipulative ways of women
Trisk is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 08:22 PM   #23 (permalink)
on fire
 
animosity's Avatar
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
Quote:
Originally posted by Trisk
The reason men usually get the short end of the stick in divorces is because a lot of people think that a child's rightful place is with his mother. If the mother is deemed unfit, however, the mother has to pay child support and the father takes the children.
It doesn't have anything to do with lazy men wanting out or the manipulative ways of women


why is the childs rightfull place with the mother...? that doesnt seem to make sense to me...
animosity is offline  
 

Tags
divorce, sex

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360