05-27-2004, 11:59 AM | #1 (permalink) | ||
Addict
Location: P-Town, WA
|
Warning to DARE officers...
Warning to DARE officers, please don't actually teach the children about the effects drugs have on people, you may lose your job.
LINKY Original Text : Quote:
Quote:
Now from that paragraph it makes me think that the teachers didn't like the DARE officer teaching kids about certain things about drugs. Now yes, there is a possibility that she was showing them how to light up a crack pipe or something and that would be somewhat odd, but I still think that DARE officers have every right and the OBLIGATION to teach children about drugs, the whole point of the program is to educate to let the children make informed choices for themselves. What are everyone elses thoughts on this?
__________________
Old signature just wasn't doing it for me anymore, so now I have this new one. It's equally as stupid but at least it looks really long. I'm probably just going to keep typing until I run out of things to babble about and see how many people actually read this. I once ran down a hill, fell down and hurt my elbow; my mom said I would be ok, she kissed it and made it all better. I've run out of things to say now, so if you have read this whole thing, congratulations you get a gold star! |
||
05-27-2004, 12:13 PM | #2 (permalink) |
My future is coming on
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
|
I think you're over-reacting in the absence of information. We don't know how the DARE officer spoke to the kids, and it could be that it WAS inappropriate. Add to that the fact that she arm-locked a kid who went to give her a hug...sounds like someone needs a vacation.
Disclaimer: I am inherently biased against DARE as a huge waste of money. It's been proven largely ineffective, anecdotal stories such as yours notwithstanding. <a href="http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/01_16_03gao.cfm">http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/01_16_03gao.cfm</a>
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing." - Anatole France |
05-27-2004, 12:16 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Fly em straight!
Location: Above and Beyond
|
Well, we can't assume what conversations were innappropriate. What if she was talking about the effects of ecxtasy and how "sex" feels really good on it, but it fucks up your brain and spine. There could have been numerous areas of inappropriate conversations that elementary kids should not have been exposed to.
I know that the program is good for the kids, but sometimes the good people do cross the line a bit to convey their message.
__________________
Doh!!!! -Homer Simpson |
05-27-2004, 12:30 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: Portland, OR
|
It's hard to say. I know the school administration's around the country tend to over-react because they fear lawsuits from parents. A friend of mine who's kid was in 1st grade was suspended from school for "sexual harassment". You know what constituted as sexual harassment? Kissing a girl once on the cheek. In fact, the parents of the girl didn't think it was a problem. But apparently, the school administration didn't care.
But at the same time, it's hard to know whether the person did do something inappropriate. And the fact the person took down a kid, seems a little overboard to me. So I don't know. It's hard to tell with the little bit of information out there about it.
__________________
Yes, I need help. No, I won't accept it. |
05-27-2004, 07:40 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: P-Town, WA
|
am i the only one that payed attention in DARE?
__________________
Old signature just wasn't doing it for me anymore, so now I have this new one. It's equally as stupid but at least it looks really long. I'm probably just going to keep typing until I run out of things to babble about and see how many people actually read this. I once ran down a hill, fell down and hurt my elbow; my mom said I would be ok, she kissed it and made it all better. I've run out of things to say now, so if you have read this whole thing, congratulations you get a gold star! |
05-27-2004, 07:48 PM | #7 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: In transit
|
Quote:
__________________
Remember, wherever you go... there you are. |
|
05-28-2004, 04:55 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Condition: Stable and Improving
Location: Finger on the little red button.
|
I teach 5th grade.
Any heartless officer that 'puts one down' is way out of line. 5th graders need a lot of attention, and sometimes that kind of affection. If you're uncomfortable with that, you should find another way (praise, compliments, or less physical contact like highfives or handshakes) to deal with them. Also, when talking about drugs, I agree that DARE doesn't work. Why? Because kids don't understand the negative consequences of drug abuse. You can't say if you smoke pot, this is what's going to happen to you. They need to be shown. You need to bring in hardcore alcoholics on their last legs, and say, this is the lifestyle that drug abuse eventually leads to. Just making vague threats doesn't work. I was the posterchild for DARE, I literally gave the keynote speech at our 8th grade graduation, and it didn't do anything to keep me away from drugs or alcohol. I'm just lucky that I didn't do anything really stupid.
__________________
Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies. Frederich Nietzsche |
05-28-2004, 05:20 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Physical contact with a student without there being a real risk to the officer's (or others') safety is completely unacceptable.
The truth probably isn't being projected in this story as I can't imagine an officer taking down a kid trying to give a hug. The kid was probably a big wise ass the whole semester and was somehow denegrating the cop just prior to trying to "hug" them. Even still there's no excuse for the actions of the officer.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
Tags |
dare, officers, warning |
|
|