04-21-2004, 08:41 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
hovering in the distance
Location: the land of milk and honey
|
draft reinstatement act
this was a topic on the radio today, because apparently it is being brought up again in Congress. because this will affect everyone, our family, our friends, and our children. i thought it belonded in General Discussion.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=38139 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...t_040420155914 Quote:
__________________
no signature required |
|
04-21-2004, 08:52 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Professor of Drinkology
|
This guy was rattling the war-sabre last year and all of his stuff died in committee. I'm not going to sweat the issue too much.
I only noticed last year since his original bill attempted to include women in the draft, which to me, made sense. I've always felt that women can server in the draft as effectively as men, even if they were NOT being pulled into service for front lines duty (whatever that means anymore).
__________________
Blah. |
04-21-2004, 10:19 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Lincoln
|
I agree, this won't pass. There's no way that people would let that happen. The way I see it, the fact that there isn't a draft is one of the main differences between the war in Iraq and Vietnam. If people were over there against there will, then the shit would really hit the fan.
|
04-22-2004, 12:04 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
Compulsary service works very well in many modern day countries, including several European ones.
That being said, I have mixed feelings, but probably more positive than negative.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
04-22-2004, 05:05 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Who You Crappin?
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
|
Shouldn't he really have said "Shouldn't every US Citizen have to pay the price of our blowhard, quick to act President and his vain attempt to win his father's war?"
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel |
04-22-2004, 05:45 AM | #10 (permalink) |
I and I
Location: Stillwater, OK
|
Donald Rumsefield is even against the draft and so are many others. It won't get reinstated. If the military needs more troops, there are other ways to get people to enlist. Also, I don't think a draft would be politically helpful to the Bush campaign...
|
04-22-2004, 05:57 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
I for one have a great appreciation for my country, without service, but there are plenty of others out there who don't even appreciate waking up and breathing.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
04-22-2004, 06:26 AM | #14 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Louisville, KY
|
I dunno, lately I've been having thoughts questioning the whole concept of wars (which, if you know me, is rather out of character)... It just seems like the citizens, who have very little to do with the conflict itself, end up having to fight and die for the disagreements of their elected leaders. It just seems.. off.. to me.
Obviously I am against the draft for this reason...
__________________
You do not use a Macintosh, instead you use a Tandy Kompressor break your glowstick, Kompressor eat your candy Kompressor open jaws, Kompressor release ants Kompressor watch you scream, Because Kompressor does not dance |
04-22-2004, 06:33 AM | #15 (permalink) |
Kiss of Death
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
|
I've always thought that there should be some form of mandatory enlistment to serve your country either military and non, but the draft is a bad idea unless say WWIII is going on.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition. |
04-22-2004, 06:43 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Is In Love
Location: I'm workin' on it
|
Quote:
__________________
Absence is to love what wind is to fire. It extinguishes the small, it enkindles the great. |
|
04-22-2004, 06:43 AM | #17 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
I'm beyond draft age myself, so take this with the obligatory grain of salt...
I never served in the military myself, but I actually don't think it's a bad idea to have some sort of compulsory service. I know some people who live in countries where military service is mandatory and they say it was the greatest experience of their lives (and these were not gung-ho folks going into it, believe me). The bonding, the discipline, the code of conduct you learn to live by apparently have a major transformative effect on people. That said, more on point to this thread: 1) We still have a draft in the US, it just hasn't been activated. All men have to register for selective service (i.e., the draft) when they turn 18. I believe all it takes to start calling people up is a presidential decree, but I could be wrong on that. If I'm right, though, then this bill is silly except to the extent it calls for expanding the system to women. 2) As said before, this will never pass. I believe Rangle introduced it to actually build opposition to the war (it's all very fine and good for the professional soldiers to be sent off somewhere - that's their job - but not my little Timmy!) |
04-22-2004, 11:08 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
hovering in the distance
Location: the land of milk and honey
|
Quote:
__________________
no signature required |
|
04-22-2004, 11:09 AM | #19 (permalink) |
big damn hero
|
I agree, this is stupid. It's just politcal caterwauling from a knee jerk reactionary. I don't know Mr. Hagel, but I can't believe he's actually serious about this. The military is against it, the administration is against it and more importantly the people seem to be against it. I just can't believe he said this to be taken seriously.
That being said, I think some sort of mandatory service is a fantastic idea. I'm not advocating throwing everybody on the front lines for two years, but rather two years of some sort "civil service" each according to his/her means. Good with computers? Work on an electronic national voting system. Good with numbers? Help the government balance their budget, lord knows they need the help. Collectively we bitch about the apathy of the younger voter, we complain about the "uninterest" of the younger generation. I think some sort of mandatory civil service would go a long ways in fixing that.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously. |
04-22-2004, 12:17 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
04-22-2004, 04:42 PM | #23 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: RI
|
the reason he probably did it was to say to if you want to start a war, there won't be any special people who, because they are rich, can get out of it like there was with Vietnam. This would outrage all of america if it were to pass because no longer would it be a war for those that don't really have any other choice(ie: those that need the money or there are no options really left for them) or the ones that want to join. It would include every little rich kid or kids with parents with connections.
In my opinion, it's more of a statement, in that he knows it will fail, then it is meant as a real action. |
04-23-2004, 07:52 AM | #26 (permalink) | ||
Psycho
Location: Princeton, NJ
|
Quote:
I think its a point that needs to be made. How many people on this thread who said some variation on "fuck that" either supported the war or didn't give a shit one way or another? Does that mean its ok for your country to go to war, but you sure as hell wouldn't go? War is a serious thing, something that must be the collective decision and burden of all of a nation's citizens. Otherwise, it will be embarked upon too since a small minority will be taking all of the damage from the large majority's decisions. Paying others to do the dirty work (i.e. the current system) doesn't help. it creates a culture where the military begins to feel like "the only true Americans," and that everyone without a military record is a lazy shit (I write this sittin in a towel at noon after sleeping in and surfing the net for hours, so maybe they have a point). It creates a culture where the everyday citizens in a democracy are disconnected from the tough things a nation-state must sometimes do. This is, afterall, what led to the fall of Rome. Quote:
/end rant, this is probablly a subject for another thread, didn't mean to distract from the draft |
||
04-23-2004, 08:10 AM | #27 (permalink) |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
I think mandatory (not necessarily military) service is a great idea, so it seems that I am in the tiny minority on this thread. I also think it is LONG LONG overdue to extend the draft to include women.
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
04-23-2004, 08:28 AM | #28 (permalink) |
Winner
|
Yeah, I also like the idea of mandatory service to your country. This would force people to give a damn about issues like whether or not to go to war. Right now, people just don't care since they think their own ass isn't on the line and this makes it much easier for our leaders to engage in unneccesary wars for purely political or ideological reasons.
|
04-23-2004, 09:49 AM | #29 (permalink) |
Runt
Location: Denver
|
Our leaders will still go to war wether we have mandatory service or not. The solution would be to have any politicians that want to go to war fight the other countries politicians. Bring the war to the fools that start it.
The problem with mandatory service in the US is that for a country this size it would be prohibitively expensive. Most countries that do have mandatory service are smaller. Besides that, I would be all for it.
__________________
<--The great infidel--> |
04-23-2004, 09:50 AM | #30 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
I would prefer the military to remain all volunteer but I have no problem whatsoever with the possibility of a draft. The only question I have is how women could legally be excluded from the process.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
04-23-2004, 10:04 AM | #31 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Quote:
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
|
04-23-2004, 11:23 AM | #32 (permalink) |
Runt
Location: Denver
|
I don't have the figures in front of me. You can either believe me or not. Anyhow, in a country this size every year we have quite a large number of persons every year that would be theoretically entering into this program. Take this number and multiply it by the $$ amount it takes to train a soldier. The resulting dollar amount is quite large. Plus, with our military becoming increasingly sophisticated, training is taking longer and longer.
Anyhow, the articles I have read made sense to me at the time.
__________________
<--The great infidel--> |
04-23-2004, 11:41 AM | #33 (permalink) |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
i think some sort of compulsory civil or security service would be a great thing. We are increasingly coming from different ethnic/social/economic/ideological/political/religious backgrounds... i think it would do great things for our country if we could all have something in common from which to draw from.
that being said, i'm going to soon be an AF officer... i certainly do not want a draft into active duty military service. for the AF at least, we have filled all of our recruiting goals and i know that officer training programs regularly turn down qualified individuals because of high competition for training slots. congress has put a limit on the number of personnel that can be in a particular branch of service at once... and each branch brushes those numbers on a yearly basis. we've got plenty of people volunteering, and plenty of people staying in. if those numbers aren't enough to fight the war in its current form... then we need to rethink how we're fighting it in the first place.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill |
04-23-2004, 12:24 PM | #34 (permalink) | |||
Guest
|
Quote:
Well, if they don't pay those who reinlist, some might consider it slavery. Others might voluntarily do it, but not all. Like *moon* said, it would be wiser to raise the pay of the enlisted....that's great for them and may also drive more to join. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
04-28-2004, 02:10 AM | #35 (permalink) | |
Irresponsible
|
Quote:
edit: I have no idea why my vBcode isn't working.... (fixed- you forgot a backslash)
__________________
I am Jack's signature. Last edited by Lebell; 04-28-2004 at 02:34 AM.. |
|
04-28-2004, 02:58 AM | #36 (permalink) | |
undead
Location: Duisburg, Germany
|
Quote:
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death — Albert Einstein |
|
04-28-2004, 06:32 PM | #37 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: st. louis
|
i don't feer a draft at all even if it went through and i was drafted i know i would be discharged before i saw any duty i just don't accept a person who tries to tell everything i should do if they told me to jump this high i wouldn't try all i would do is say i can't and won't i don't think it would then be long before i ended up with a dishonerable discharge
__________________
"The difference between commiment and involvment is like a ham and egg breakfast the chicken was involved but the pig was commited" "Thrice happy is the nation that has a glorious history. Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt |
04-29-2004, 12:51 AM | #40 (permalink) |
Warrior Smith
Location: missouri
|
Way too little public support for this thing to pass- brings back the evil specter of vietnam- and no politico in his right mind wants to be associated with that........
__________________
Thought the harder, Heart the bolder, Mood the more as our might lessens |
Tags |
act, draft, reinstatement |
|
|