04-04-2004, 05:27 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Apocalypse Nerd
|
Teenage Girl charged with Child Pornography for exploiting self
Quote:
No, I'm not advocating that this should be allowed. However, I am familiar with criminal justice and I think that charging this teenager with a felony is over-zealous. On one hand the law is there to protect kids from exploitation -children are not viewed as capable of making informed decisions on their own behalf. On the other hand the law is saying that this child made a decision to which she was accountable. It reminds me of my own juvenile delinquency days when certain friends of mine were charged with "Minor in Possession of Alchohol" -and then prosecuted by the courts as an Adult. |
|
04-04-2004, 05:34 AM | #2 (permalink) |
follower of the child's crusade?
|
if the pictures are of herself I am not sure what legal right the state has regarding this.
And the girl sounds like she needs counselling, not felony charges, how on EARTH is sending to jail going to help?
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate, for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain without being uncovered." The Gospel of Thomas |
04-04-2004, 06:01 AM | #3 (permalink) |
The Griffin
|
two kids in the boston area were suspended from school for this...
while on a school bus one girl (14) stuck her hand down a boy's (14) pants - basically "i'll show you mine if you show me yours..." this follows a story of maybe a year or so ago where a girl (also 14 - i think) performed fellatio on a simarly aged boy on a school bus... they too were suspended... in both these two cases no charges were filed and the two were remanded to counseling... this falls in the lap of the parents not the courts... what the courts should do is find out who recieved the pix and whethre they were solicited from her by the recipient(s) |
04-04-2004, 06:16 AM | #4 (permalink) | |
Wehret Den Anfängen!
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
(ok, that was bad)
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest. |
|
04-04-2004, 12:28 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
Logically, it makes no sense.
In otherwords, they are charging her with the felony crime of exploiting a child (which is done by an adult), therefore she is an adult. But if she is an adult, then the pictures are not of a child.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
04-04-2004, 01:52 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Oh and legally PA can charge her with the felony, thanks to this little gem:
http://www.cdt.org/speech/pennwebblo...00penn7330.pdf She doesn't have to be an adult to be charged with the crime either. |
04-04-2004, 04:52 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Crazy
|
I think the the investigation is required to find out who the receipients are. It is likely that they will be charged if they are adult aged. Also, was she enticed into sending photos of herself? i.e. if an adult was to solicit an underage to send photos of herself then he'll be arrested & charged.
But I agree that the girl needs counselling. |
04-04-2004, 05:11 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
I can see it now: "35 houses were raided today on suspicion of the display of family portraits on hearth mantles." |
|
04-04-2004, 06:00 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Comment or else!!
Location: Home sweet home
|
[/joke on] My gosh. Kids these days, so eager to be whores. Damn MTV!!!! [/joke off]
This girl needs some serious help, I just hope that her pics doesn't accidently made it to the titties board under "I'm losing my faith in the younger generation of girls very fast here. ." Oh the horror!!! Just goes to show you that cameras and stupid girls do not mix.
__________________
Him: Ok, I have to ask, what do you believe? Me: Shit happens. Last edited by KellyC; 04-04-2004 at 09:30 PM.. |
04-04-2004, 06:12 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Addict
|
I think it's outrageous that she is being charged with a crime. I hate the law. I also don't think she needs counseling. Girls in ancient greece married at like 14. I mean girls go through puberty, and their bodies start telling them to go have sex. I don't think there is anything morally wrong with a 15 year old girl showing nude pictures of herself to people if she is smart about it.
|
04-04-2004, 06:48 PM | #16 (permalink) | |||
Comment or else!!
Location: Home sweet home
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Him: Ok, I have to ask, what do you believe? Me: Shit happens. |
|||
04-04-2004, 08:01 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
Bang bang
Location: New Zealand
|
Quote:
I mean the courts are effetively saying "we will prosecute you as an adult, even if the crime we are prosecuting you for implies that you are not". Just think, some ambulace chasing lawyer will probably use that as the defence
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind... |
|
04-04-2004, 08:04 PM | #18 (permalink) | |
My own person -- his by choice
Location: Lebell's arms
|
Quote:
I do, however, agree that this is an issue the family needs to address and that may call for counseling.
__________________
If you can go deeply into lovemaking, the ego disappears. That is the beauty of lovemaking, that it is another source of a glimpse of god It's not about being perfect; it's about developing some skill at managing imperfection. |
|
04-04-2004, 08:36 PM | #19 (permalink) |
/nɑndəsˈkrɪpt/
Location: LV-426
|
Guess I'm in the minority, but I don't see why she needs counselling, just based on what she did. I do remember what I was like when I was her age, raging hormones and all. If she was 3 years older, she could be posting pictures of herself in Tilted Exhibition, and none of you would be crying "counselling!"
The way I see it, these 14-year-olds giving each other blowjobs are the fruit and product of our society, as well as the natural process of coming of age. Sexually active or curious 14-year-olds aren't as uncommon as they perhaps used to be, but they're not what I'd consider a huge problem, either. I see a lot of people - and I don't mean here at the TFP - suggesting counselling as a solution to most problems, especially with teenagers. While I'll admit that some of them could use it - as could quite a few adults - I think we're a bit too quick to resort to psychotherapy. In some cases it is warranted, but in some it all only helps build a society where a mother sends her son to a therapist because she caught him jacking off - and no one bats an eye. Posting nude pics of herself online? This girl could use an injection of common sense, perhaps, but therapy? Give me a break.
__________________
Who is John Galt? Last edited by Prince; 04-04-2004 at 08:38 PM.. |
04-04-2004, 08:42 PM | #20 (permalink) | |
Comment or else!!
Location: Home sweet home
|
Quote:
__________________
Him: Ok, I have to ask, what do you believe? Me: Shit happens. |
|
04-05-2004, 01:22 AM | #21 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Right here
|
I agree with Prince.
I'm also not even too bothered by 14 year olds giving each other hand jobs (or BJ's). I guess I should qualify that with I'm less bothered by that than if the girl had, say, been caught giving a BJ to the bus driver! Anyway, I don't think teenage sex is anything that's new to our society or part of social morays degenerating. I thought that was a pretty common age to start playing around--the shocking part, to me, is that the average age is dropping to middle school and below! But I digress, the "counseling" I suggest is sex education. Other than that, a bit of common sense from the family as to the dangers lurking on-line. Short of not knowing safe sex or hex, teenage nudie banter isn't blowing my sensibilities apart for some reason. All that said (as if anyone's even reading this anymore ), I think the prosecutor is using this as a scare and/or legal tactic to seize her property and track down the oglers.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann "You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman |
04-05-2004, 02:08 AM | #22 (permalink) |
Delicious
|
First. I gotta agree that people scream "Counselling!" way too much. Once we've all gone to councelling, We're all going to turn into nazi-like drones.
This whole case is contradictory. I doubt she'll be charged with a felony. I also doubt anyone that recieved the pictures will get punished for her picture(s) alone, they could however be investigated. On a side note, I don't think her age really mattered in HER decision to post her nude pictures. She could have been 15 or 25, she wanted to do it, so she did. I'd bet her only regret is getting caught. edit: I just re-read the article, She may have had pictures of other children, she could be tried as an adult for that.
__________________
“It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick” - Dave Barry Last edited by Reese; 04-05-2004 at 02:15 AM.. |
04-05-2004, 05:24 AM | #24 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
If you sent photos of yourself, knowing it was a crime to do so, you are guilty of the charge, as assinine as it seems.
I used to use AIM and on AIM you can just send a picture without having it ask about the download (it was the default setting). Imagine you are chatting with some girl, she sends you a picture of herself like the girl in question, and there is a record of that the police have now? Even if you are cleared the papers will only run So-and-So arrested for possession of child pornography. Not the oh btw he was innocent.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
04-05-2004, 06:18 AM | #25 (permalink) |
Had to leave this awesome space
|
They're trying to make a point. 15 year old girls should not be taking nude pictures and passing them around. They need to be held accountable as well. This way, they know they'll get in trouble just as well as the guy (or girl) viewing them will. It needs to go both ways. There needs to be punishment for the girls involved so there is incentive to not do it. This is the start of that punishment and an example needs to be set.
No where's the pictures of the ones that just turned 18? ;-) |
04-05-2004, 06:33 AM | #26 (permalink) |
Industrialist
Location: Southern California
|
Carnivore is monitoring this thread and your opinions will be held against you in a court of law.
__________________
All truth passes through three stages: First it is ridiculed Second, it is violently opposed and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER (1788-1860) |
04-05-2004, 06:36 AM | #27 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
I seriously believe there should be a panel of rational jury that are allowed to bend rules and stuff. If we had that, people wouldn't be sueing macdonalds for making them fat. |
|
04-05-2004, 01:05 PM | #28 (permalink) | |
Loves my girl in thongs
Location: North of Mexico, South of Canada
|
Quote:
Glad you liked the thread though. I hardly think someone choosing to give out pictures of themselves nude to like aged peers is a crime in the eyes of anyone except parents who want to pretend their kids aren't sexual. Kids have always done things like take pictures of each other in sexual positions and hook-up in middle school bathrooms. Hell, I did the latter in the early 90's when I was in midddle school on a regular basis.
__________________
Seen on an employer evaluation: "The wheel is turning but the hamsters dead" ____________________________ Is arch13 really a porn diety ? find out after the film at 11. -Nanofever |
|
04-05-2004, 01:34 PM | #29 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
04-05-2004, 01:52 PM | #30 (permalink) |
BFG Builder
Location: University of Maryland
|
Just because she's being charged doesn't mean they won't be dropped. Cops don't have time to debate wrong and right; their job is to get arrests in and let the courts handle things. The charges will probably be dropped on the condition that she see help, and whoever recieved the pictures will probably be in for a world of hurt.
I think this is just an example of how law isn't perfect. Child porn laws are a good thing, and a couple of exceptional situations doesn't really warrant any kind of major change.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, you must be having an orgasm. |
04-05-2004, 05:19 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
I remember being 15 and being so horny i could have screamed. All I thought about was getting laid and did everything in my 15 year old power to get laid. (It actually took another 2 years.) But at 15, i definitely remember pulling off my pants with a few girls and vice versa. A big so what else is new comes to mind. |
|
Tags |
charged, child, exploiting, girl, pornography, teenage |
|
|