Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2008, 11:56 AM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: here&there
two jets

I was putting groceries in my car this past Sunday, when I witnessed something , that I believe should not have happened.
I live near an airport, not a huge airport, but fairly large, and I am directly in the flight path of outgoing and incoming planes.
The grocery store is in close proximity to the airport also, being almost at the end of the runway. I heard, before I saw, what sounded like a jet, F-18 or F-16 taking off, when I looked up as the "plane" crested the grocery store, I was absolutely flabbergasted to see, not one, but two jets, wing tip to wing tip, in what appeared to be a race.
I have a camera in my purse, but to tell you the truth, I was almost in a state of shock, at what I was seeing, and did not react fast enough to get the camera.
I watched as they continued to stay wing tip to wing tip until they do the arc to go out over the ocean.
It is quite stressful, living this close to an airport, because most of us know, it is not a matter of if, only a matter of when, something major is going to happen. Mainly because there is no margin for error left to the pilot, because of the length of the runways, for one thing.
These two jets were military, I'm sure, and it was confirmed that two F-18's, did indeed take off from that airport at the same time. But no further information was given.
If something had have happened, the pilots of those aircraft, could eject, landing safely most likely, whereas , falling debris would have claimed lives.
I may be ignorant of the fact, of jets such as this taking off this way on a regular basis, but it is the first time I had witnessed it.
I immediately came home and emailed a local paper, and asked them to contact someone and tell the military if they want to play games, to do it out over the desert, and not in a populated area, such as this.
am I wrong, and do jets normally take off in this manner?
__________________
Never give up on something that you can’t go a day without thinking about. ~
lktknow is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 12:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
While commercial planes are kept as far away from each other as possible, frequently military planes--especially fighters--are flown in close formation. Airplanes in formation can seem alarmingly close from the ground, especially to civilians who aren't used to seeing such things. This doesn't really sound to me like anything to worry about.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 12:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
yep, non event.



I live by an airforce base and T38's are always taking off in formation and practicing maneuvers.




Last edited by telekinetic; 09-16-2008 at 12:25 PM..
telekinetic is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 12:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Better side by side then one in front of the other. Kind of odd they'd bee doing anything like this over a populated area, but I agree with ratbastid sounds like standard military operational training.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 12:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by lktknow View Post
It is quite stressful, living this close to an airport, because most of us know, it is not a matter of if, only a matter of when, something major is going to happen.
Additionally, I would heavily disagree with that statement. Does it stress you out living in a city with freeways? Because that is DEFINITELY a case of if, not when, something major is going to happen. Airports? Not so much.
telekinetic is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 12:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Ayashe's Avatar
 
I live just outside of a small airport. The sort of airport that civilians with planes will own a hanger outside of and keep a small plane of their own. Regardless of it being small, they do some shows out of the airport, I have seen this many times. Most larger airports will also have a small military set up somewhere on it. National security is a good thing, I don't mind so much that we have the capability of being spread out like that, planes available at a moments notice. Where I live they also do fly-bys like this for Independence Day, Patriot Day etc.
Ayashe is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 02:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Chicken scratch.
 
Gabbyness's Avatar
 
Location: Japan!!!
It happens hundreds of times per day in dozens of airfields all across the country.
__________________
One, two, three, four, fiiiiiiiifth.
Gabbyness is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 06:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: here&there
Well, it just goes to show you, you learn something new daily. I was totally unaware of this being normal procedure for the jets to fly that way. Oh, I have seen air shows, but I did not know they flew out of airports in that formation.
And, twistedmosiac, you are right in your analogy of the freeways and the airport, I felt rather dumb after reading that. However, I think the main reason I said it was only a matter of, when, is because , the planes taking off from this airport, are using runways, where it leaves no margin for any type of error . They need longer runways. or??
__________________
Never give up on something that you can’t go a day without thinking about. ~
lktknow is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 05:04 AM   #9 (permalink)
Chicken scratch.
 
Gabbyness's Avatar
 
Location: Japan!!!
Don't worry, those F-18s only need about 3,000ft to take off.

Now land, on the other hand . . .
__________________
One, two, three, four, fiiiiiiiifth.
Gabbyness is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 07:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by lktknow View Post
They need longer runways. or??

No. These are high performance jet aircraft capable of doing maneuvers civilian pilots can only dream about. What the "book" and the regulations state and what the aircraft is capable of differ... greatly. Much depends on weight at take off, air density (elevation) , air temp. etc..

Here's an answer from a F18 pilot out of California-

Quote:
Min landing/takeoff roll is determined by many factors. For takeoff, we consult our performance manual to go through the charts etc taking into account runway condition (wet or not) temperature, density altitude, gross weight and type of takeoff (afterburner or mil power). Typically the takeoff distance with a standard load ( one centerline fuel tank) here in Lemoore is 2600 feet, a little more when hot and less when cold. This being said, if we max perform the jet we can get in the air in around 1500 feet Obviously on a carrier we get airborne within 250 feet or so.
For landing we can stop when light on fuel and stores within around 2700 feet however the "required" ( by our higher ranking officers) distance is 7000 feet waiverable by the boss to 6000. good to know that we can stop in under 3000 feet though in a dire situation. For landing on the boat we stop in 200 feet or so with the aid of a hook and arresting wire.
Yahoo! Answers - What is the minimum lenght of a runway an F 18 need to take of f and land?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 07:47 AM   #11 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by lktknow View Post
And, twistedmosiac, you are right in your analogy of the freeways and the airport, I felt rather dumb after reading that. However, I think the main reason I said it was only a matter of, when, is because , the planes taking off from this airport, are using runways, where it leaves no margin for any type of error . They need longer runways. or??
The main runway at Long Beach airport, (which, based on my skills as an internet ninja, I assume you are referring to), is 10,000 feet. In a pinch, with a perfect pilot, you could probably land the space shuttle on it. At sea level, there are only a handful of runways longer than 10,000 (LAX is 12,000), and none of them need to be for any aircraft, commercial or military, that I am aware of which is in regular service.
telekinetic is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:22 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
Sticky's Avatar
 
Some Canadian Airport runway lengths
Robert L. Stanfield (Halifax) - 8,800ft or 2,682m on the longest runway
Mirabel (near Montreal) - 12,000ft or 3,658m
Pierre Elliot Trudeau (Montreal) - 11,000 or 3,353m on the longest runway
Pearson (Toronto) - 11,120 or 3,389m on the longest runway
London International - 8,800ft or 2,682m on the longest runway
James Armstrong Richardson International (Winnipeg) - 11,000 or 3,353m on the longest runway
Regina International - 7,900ft or 2,408m on the longest runway
Calgary International - 12,675ft or 3,863m on the longest runway
Edmonton International - 11,000 or 3,353m on the longest runway
Vancouver International - 11,500ft or 3,505 on the longest runway
__________________
Sticky The Stickman
Sticky is offline  
Old 09-18-2008, 05:00 AM   #13 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Flying wingtip to wingtip is a typical attack/intercept formation. It may have been training, or they may have been scrambled in response to an unidentified aircraft. I've seen what military pilots are capable of, and I would feel safer knowing they're there to deal with anything.

This reminds me that I miss the days before budget cuts when the Air National Guard A-10s would fly right over my house every other weekend. From what I've heard, I am the sole person in the world who thinks they look awesome and not ugly (same with the B-52.)
MSD is offline  
Old 09-18-2008, 05:04 AM   #14 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSD View Post
From what I've heard, I am the sole person in the world who thinks they look awesome and not ugly (same with the B-52.)
Nope, I too love both BUFF's and Warthogs.
telekinetic is offline  
Old 09-18-2008, 05:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSD View Post
Flying wingtip to wingtip is a typical attack/intercept formation. It may have been training, or they may have been scrambled in response to an unidentified aircraft. I've seen what military pilots are capable of, and I would feel safer knowing they're there to deal with anything.

This reminds me that I miss the days before budget cuts when the Air National Guard A-10s would fly right over my house every other weekend. From what I've heard, I am the sole person in the world who thinks they look awesome and not ugly (same with the B-52.)

I like the "Hog" but I like almost all aircraft.

I had a chance a couple years back to get a ride on a B-52. They were charging around $500 and the ride wasn't long. I just couldn't part with that kind of cash for what seems like such a frivolous thing. Though I admit I wish I'd have done it now.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 09-18-2008, 10:33 AM   #16 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
I grew up as an AF brat and lived on Air Force bases most of my life. You get used to all the antics. Two taking off together is nothing when you regularlly see 4 do the same thing in formation. The main runway in Germany went right over base housing. What's amazing is to be under a B-52 bomber when landing or taking off.
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 09-18-2008, 03:54 PM   #17 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: here&there
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedmosaic View Post
The main runway at Long Beach airport, (which, based on my skills as an internet ninja, I assume you are referring to), is 10,000 feet. In a pinch, with a perfect pilot, you could probably land the space shuttle on it. At sea level, there are only a handful of runways longer than 10,000 (LAX is 12,000), and none of them need to be for any aircraft, commercial or military, that I am aware of which is in regular service.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean they needed longer runways for the F-18's, I meant for the bigger planes that fly out of there, that is what I meant by only a matter of when, as far as the margin for error.
The one runway is sometimes shut down for repair, making them use the shorter runway, which is putting a lot at risk.
__________________
Never give up on something that you can’t go a day without thinking about. ~
lktknow is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 07:19 AM   #18 (permalink)
Chicken scratch.
 
Gabbyness's Avatar
 
Location: Japan!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo View Post
I grew up as an AF brat and lived on Air Force bases most of my life. You get used to all the antics. Two taking off together is nothing when you regularlly see 4 do the same thing in formation. The main runway in Germany went right over base housing. What's amazing is to be under a B-52 bomber when landing or taking off.

Four from the same runway = "Stream Go"

Four from adjacent runways = Herd Go
__________________
One, two, three, four, fiiiiiiiifth.
Gabbyness is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:34 PM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
A B-2 bomber flew right over my community when I was at the pool last weekend. That was incredible. They are so quiet when flying towards you because the exhaust comes out over the top of the wing. This helps diffuse its heat signal but also makes it quieter on approach.
new man is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 05:46 PM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
greytone's Avatar
 
The F-22's are assembled near my home. They can be seen flying a few approaches with a more traditional jet chasing from behind when they are completed before they get their final paint job. At times they are so close it almost seem like you could reach up and touch them. I am far more afraid of the idiots texting as they drive near me.
__________________
I was there to see beautiful naked women. So was everybody else. It's a common failing.
Robert A Heinlein in "They Do It With Mirrors"
greytone is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 07:15 PM   #21 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
What's amazing is to be under a B-52 bomber when landing or taking off.
Lived 20 miles from Barksdale AFB when I was a kid. You a'int joking.
The_Dunedan is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 06:33 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
Flying wingtip to wingtip is a typical attack/intercept formation. It may have been training, or they may have been scrambled in response to an unidentified aircraft. I've seen what military pilots are capable of, and I would feel safer knowing they're there to deal with anything.
Bingo. Generally when they take off like that it's a scramble maneuver. (short story)

Long Story: Aircraft generally only take off into the wind. This is why any decent size airport has about 7-12 runways, most pointing in different directions. So multiple aircraft have to take off of really 1 runway in as short a time as possible. Wingtip to Wingtip lowers the interference as opposed to infront-behind. So they double-up to avoid the jetwash of the aircraft infront of them. Military aircraft practice this ALL the time, much like firefighters they need to have 0 time wasted when the call is made.

It is also used when pretending to be a larger aircraft on radar. The Israelis used a similar maneuver to mask 5 F-16s to bomb the Iraqi Nuclear site in the '80s. By flying so close together it looks like one large plane instead of multiple smaller ones.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 07:07 PM   #23 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
Bingo. Generally when they take off like that it's a scramble maneuver. (short story)

Long Story: Aircraft generally only take off into the wind. This is why any decent size airport has about 7-12 runways, most pointing in different directions. So multiple aircraft have to take off of really 1 runway in as short a time as possible. Wingtip to Wingtip lowers the interference as opposed to infront-behind. So they double-up to avoid the jetwash of the aircraft infront of them. Military aircraft practice this ALL the time, much like firefighters they need to have 0 time wasted when the call is made.

It is also used when pretending to be a larger aircraft on radar. The Israelis used a similar maneuver to mask 5 F-16s to bomb the Iraqi Nuclear site in the '80s. By flying so close together it looks like one large plane instead of multiple smaller ones.
7-12 runways? Is this a military thing? LAX has 4 runways, which you could call 8 if you include changes in flight patterns. i.e. 36 inbound north becomes 18 inbound south. No, I didn't look up LAX runway headings, just used a generic north south runway number.

And it's not just "jetwash" you get the same effect in small planes. The front plane creates air turbulence and can cause the rear plane to either loose lift and stall or spin suddenly. As you state side by side is much, much safer.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 07:18 PM   #24 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
7-12 runways? Is this a military thing? LAX has 4 runways, which you could call 8 if you include changes in flight patterns. i.e. 36 inbound north becomes 18 inbound south. No, I didn't look up LAX runway headings, just used a generic north south runway number.

And it's not just "jetwash" you get the same effect in small planes. The front plane creates air turbulence and can cause the rear plane to either loose lift and stall or spin suddenly. As you state side by side is much, much safer.
The base I basically grew up on had 7, and it was a small base. There were 3 in a triangle formation which had parallel runways (6), and the other was one very large one for the unlikely Galaxy landing. The parallel runways are designed in case of aerial attacks, you have multiple runways which increase your chance of an intact runway if someone bombs it. Also, you now have 4 aircraft taking off at the same time as opposed to 2.

And no it's not technically "jetwash", however it's in essence the same. It's the turbulence which comes from the rear jet engine mixed with the vortexes caused by not only the wings but rear fins. I used the term jetwash because it's pretty much all encompassing. In short, you don't want to follow too closely.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas

Last edited by Seaver; 09-21-2008 at 07:22 PM..
Seaver is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:36 AM   #25 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
The base I basically grew up on had 7, and it was a small base. There were 3 in a triangle formation which had parallel runways (6), and the other was one very large one for the unlikely Galaxy landing. The parallel runways are designed in case of aerial attacks, you have multiple runways which increase your chance of an intact runway if someone bombs it. Also, you now have 4 aircraft taking off at the same time as opposed to 2.

And no it's not technically "jetwash", however it's in essence the same. It's the turbulence which comes from the rear jet engine mixed with the vortexes caused by not only the wings but rear fins. I used the term jetwash because it's pretty much all encompassing. In short, you don't want to follow too closely.
Wow, that's a lot of runways. Other then landing once in the middle of the night on a C-5 MAC flight I just have no experience with military air bases. I used to land private planes all the time at Tillamook, Oregon which is and old WWII blimp base. Blimp bases don't have a need for a large number of runways.

And you can follow close, just be a higher altitude. The turbulence is naturally pushed down as it leaves the aircraft. I've always wonder about how much planning and effort went into figuring exactly out how far back the plane being fueled in mid air fueling maneuvers is positioned.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 09:38 AM   #26 (permalink)
Riding the Ocean Spray
 
BadNick's Avatar
 
Location: S.E. PA in U Sofa
For most of the last 35 years I've worked quite close to Willow Grove Naval Air Station. When there is above average activity, about the most common aircraft buzzing around are the A10 Warthogs...I also love those things they are so cool. They can also zoom along pretty fast, but what I find really cool is how slowly they can fly...I almost thought it was a Harrier or something that can hover in place but it was a very slowly moving A10. I think they look like some gigantic killer dinosaur insect thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
...it's not technically "jetwash", however it's in essence the same. It's the turbulence which comes from the rear jet engine mixed with the vortexes caused by not only the wings but rear fins. I used the term jetwash because it's pretty much all encompassing. In short, you don't want to follow too closely.
I had these cool pics from a few months ago, San Fran Fleetweek Airshow...I posted this in another section here but it applies again so...check out the air and water disturbance around these guys:











BadNick is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 02:52 PM   #27 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Picture generally described as breaking of the sound barrier. Depending on altitude, humidity, etc, this can be true or false. Either way it's amazing to see in person.

__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:15 PM   #28 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Awesome pix guys. I don't think I've ever seen a pix of a aircraft breaking the sound barrier.

Also boats and planes, almost as good as porn.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 11:42 AM   #29 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo View Post
What's amazing is to be under a B-52 bomber when landing or taking off.
My dad told me about seeing the SR-71 take off when he was in Alaska during the cold war. When they need to respond to something fast, it takes off at part throttle, gets a few hundred feet off the ground, afterburners are ignited, and there's a massive sonic boom as it disappears from view. That's something I want to see.
MSD is offline  
 

Tags
jets


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360