Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Propose a "TFP Bill" (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/135561-propose-tfp-bill.html)

Halx 05-23-2008 11:05 AM

Propose a "TFP Bill"
 
Senators frequently propose bills in order to enact the will of their constituents. Congress votes on the bills and some things get passed into law.

Well, let's pretend you're all members of the TFP congress. I want you to propose a bill for change. It can be the addition/deletion of a forum. It can be for the appropriation of funds for a new feature. It can be a new rule that we need or an old rule that needs to be put out of its misery. I, being the president and all, can veto any of these bills, but I will entertain reasonable ones.

The public will show their support for your bill and the most popular will go into consideration.

And for the hell of it, name your bills.

SecretMethod70 05-23-2008 11:30 AM

ooh, give them numbers too, like TFPR 0001 (TFP Resolution 0001).


Cause it's fun.

xepherys 05-23-2008 11:31 AM

TFP Fair Trade Bill
 

_______________________________________________________________________


IN THE TFP CONGRESS

May 23, 2008

Mr. Xepherys submits the following for resolution, which was
referred to the Committee on Fair Trade

_______________________________________________________________________


Expressing a desire for a buy/sell/trade forum on the TFP to allow community members to offer items and services to other members before using or without needing the services of eBay, Craigslist and other large public forums.

Whereas there are a fair number of regular members on the TFP;

Whereas members may often find themselves ready to discard usable, well-kept items;

Whereas members may keep record of good and/or fair practices held by other members in a sense of commerce;

Whereas there is a distinct sense of trust amongst members of the TFP;

Now therefore it be requested that a forum for such buying, selling and trading amongst members of the TFP be created, tried and evaluated for usefulness; Furthermore let such forum be monitored by moderators; Still further, allow such forum to maintain a sticky as the top post allowing for feedback of transactions between members.

Bill O'Rights 05-23-2008 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
I, being the president and all, can veto any of these bills, but I will entertain reasonable ones.

Can a 2/3 majority override your veto? :D

Glory's Sun 05-23-2008 11:41 AM

TFP 0069 (hey nobody said keep numbers in order)

*disclaimer* I have no intent on wording it like a real bill or all that..

Place some resources into a webcam chat. Could help the community become a closer group and it is nice to see the faces behind the posts.

ShaniFaye 05-23-2008 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xepherys

_______________________________________________________________________


IN THE TFP CONGRESS

May 23, 2008

Mr. Xepherys submits the following for resolution, which was
referred to the Committee on Fair Trade

_______________________________________________________________________


Expressing a desire for a buy/sell/trade forum on the TFP to allow community members to offer items and services to other members before using or without needing the services of eBay, Craigslist and other large public forums.

Whereas there are a fair number of regular members on the TFP;

Whereas members may often find themselves ready to discard usable, well-kept items;

Whereas members may keep record of good and/or fair practices held by other members in a sense of commerce;

Whereas there is a distinct sense of trust amongst members of the TFP;

Now therefore it be requested that a forum for such buying, selling and trading amongst members of the TFP be created, tried and evaluated for usefulness; Furthermore let such forum be monitored by moderators; Still further, allow such forum to maintain a sticky as the top post allowing for feedback of transactions between members.


I 2nd this one and propose it only be available to members that have access the areas like Members Playground (unless something has changed and thats accessible to everyone now...then I suggest something like members with access to exhibition)

Willravel 05-23-2008 12:10 PM

HR0001: Congressional Resolution 1- Establishing The Use of Democratic Votes on Bills before being brought before the POTFP (President of Tilted Forum Project) for veto and for forum leadership.

1st Congress
1st Session

H. RES. 0001

(1) Calling on the TFP government to establish a member's/citizen's right to vote on resolutions and bills before being presented before the President, in order to --
- (a) create a democratic system of government under the oligarchical parliament and supreme chancellor/president; and
- (b) create an experiment which can be referenced by this and other forums as a model or first attempt at a democratically ruled forum
(2) Calling on the TFP government to hold free elections for basic moderators, however still allowing the president, super-moderators, and administrators to choose the candidates, so long as
- (a) there are no hanging chad; and
- (b) the vote is anonymous.

Halx 05-23-2008 12:31 PM

I like xepherys' bill. I like guccilvr's bill.

Willravel 05-23-2008 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
I like xepherys' bill. I like guccilvr's bill.

*tear*

Bees 05-23-2008 12:44 PM

TFP 0000003

OPEN MESSAGING

--------------------------

Members currently have the option of sending email messages and private messages to each other. A third option would also be highly desireable: OPEN MESSAGING.

Open Messages would appear in a members profile similar to the way our journals currently appear; most recent entry on top. Members should be able to make their Open Message boards public or private or limit the visibility to selected other members or maybe only to members on their buddy list.

Open Messages would not be "sent" like our private messages; they would be "posted" like our journal entries. So I could post a message to my own message board and any other member of TFP could also post to my board if I choose to make it completely public. A member could easily host a mutli-party chat by inviting members to post on his/her Message Board at the same time. If I am exchanging messages on my board with one buddy I could send a private message to another buddy inviting her/him to a multi-party chat.

Q. - What is the point of all this you ask?
Isn't this idea redundant with the capabilities we already have in our forums and our journal commenting ?

A. - Similar to the web cam proposal I think Open Messaging could bring a lot of people a lot closer together. I think most members will consider this to be a public way of chatting and most people will be very open and intimate in their chats the way they already are in the forums. Other people may choose to keep their Open Message boards semi-private and use them for a selected group of buddies to have private chats and exchange gossip.

As a TFP member I can currently peruse other member's journals if they choose to make them public and I can make comments here and there. Similarly with this idea I could peruse other member's Open Message boards and read the conversations they are having and post a message or even jump into an ongoing conversation if I stumble upon one. I have used this type of Open Message capability in another forum I belong to and I have found it to be exhilarating. I have participated in many epic multi-party chats and I have made tremendous long lasting, online frienships in this way.

There is alot more to this idea than I can possibley express here. If anyone is interested in seeing how this works I can send you an invitation to Orkut where hundreds of thousands of these Open Messages are posted by members from across the world. In Orkut they are called "scraps" and the member's Open Message boards are called "scrapbooks". Orkut also has thousands of forums and also has a private messaging capability. The problem with Orkut is that is left almost completely unmoderated by Google and it has become a wild and wooley environment. If we could do something similar to the "scrapbooks" in TFP with our mature members and our excellent moderation I think we could really take our forum project to a new level.

I invite your comments and ideas and hope that one or two people will take me up on my offer to invite them to experience this type of messaging.

telekinetic 05-23-2008 12:47 PM

<hr>
<b>TFP00137: Optional Workplace Standards Compliance Act of 2008("OWSCA")</b><br>Establishing a mechanism by which the tilted forum project can be brought into compliance with workplace internet browsing standards.
<hr>
  1. Tilted Forum Project ("the forum") is an adult online discussion community, and, as such, has a wide range of content, some of which does not comply with workplace internet standards ("NSFW content").<br>
  2. This NSFW content is present primarily in a subsection titled "Errogenous Zone," plus one additional forum, but current board standards also allow other pages to contain NSFW content, either as the subject matter (normally labeled with "NSFW" in the thread title or link body), or in the forum of user's avatars.<br>
  3. It is not desireable to permanently or completely remove the NSFW content from the forum, for a variety of reasons not disputed by this proposal.<br>
  4. Many users might wish to access the forum from a location that permits internet access, but does not permit NSFW content. This is currently possible only through disabling avatars and avoiding the known NSFW content locations. NSFW content could still be viewed accidently through various actions, with varying degrees of penalty depending upon the terminal being used.<br>

    THEREFORE
    <br>
  5. OWSCA proposes that a mechanism be introduced by which the board can easily be brought into full compliance with restricted browsing standards.

    (a) This mechanism should ideally be persistent to the terminal, not to the account, so that home accounts do not inherit the permisisons of the workplace terminal. <br>
    (b) If (a) is infeasable, a front-page option, easily accessible upon login to the main page, should be put in place. <br>
    (c) To ensure that the option is comprehensive, it should remove any threads marked NSFW from being displayed in the forum indexs, as well as remove the primarily NSFW content forums from both the general listing and the 'find new posts' dialog box. <br>
    (d) To allow for variations in neccessary compliance levels, there should be a per-user profile option similar to 'hide avatars when browsing in safe mode (yes/no)

djtestudo 05-23-2008 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xepherys

_______________________________________________________________________


IN THE TFP CONGRESS

May 23, 2008

Mr. Xepherys submits the following for resolution, which was
referred to the Committee on Fair Trade

_______________________________________________________________________


Expressing a desire for a buy/sell/trade forum on the TFP to allow community members to offer items and services to other members before using or without needing the services of eBay, Craigslist and other large public forums.

Whereas there are a fair number of regular members on the TFP;

Whereas members may often find themselves ready to discard usable, well-kept items;

Whereas members may keep record of good and/or fair practices held by other members in a sense of commerce;

Whereas there is a distinct sense of trust amongst members of the TFP;

Now therefore it be requested that a forum for such buying, selling and trading amongst members of the TFP be created, tried and evaluated for usefulness; Furthermore let such forum be monitored by moderators; Still further, allow such forum to maintain a sticky as the top post allowing for feedback of transactions between members.

I propose, as an amendment to the resolution by the Honorable Xepherys, that there be created an entire forum devoted to the Town of Bel Air, in the State of Maryland, to be used exclusively by residents of said location and with all honors, rights and privliges given to any other forum on the TFP.

(Pork for my constituents :thumbsup:)

uncle phil 05-23-2008 01:02 PM

i remember b'lair...

Shauk 05-23-2008 01:36 PM

TFPsumbill020xD6

I propose all female participants in the exhibition forum get together and wrestle eachother for jello shots.

I got nothin.

Hain 05-23-2008 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shauk
TFPsumbill020xD6

I propose all female participants in the exhibition forum get together and wrestle eachother for jello shots.

I got nothin.

I am sorry, could you please rephrase that with a form of a John F Kennedy accent?

MexicanOnABike 05-23-2008 02:28 PM

I agree and vote FOR the TFP00137: NSFW act. it's a great idea. every thread should have a check for NSFW when it's created. i'm sure it could be possible to make.

I also really like the TFP Fair Trade Bill. As long as it's monitored from both ends or not at all. It just needs a good way to post pictures of what we sell and to where we agree to ship it to. So either mark that clearly in your post or in your thread title. We should get a MOD to delete or lock the threads of items sold or not selling anymore with an easy PM from the thread creator.

Also, we need to keep it clean of fake items and ads. so no mail order brides and no magic pills.

Manuel Hong 05-23-2008 02:30 PM

I like the buy/sell idea too.
All in Favor?

I'm actually surprised that Twistedmosaic's OWSCA proposal isn't already an Act. I never had to operate in "safe mode," but after reading in one of the threads that someone couldn't access TFP at a Panera, it seems to make a lot of sense to have something like that. I'd be bummed if I was blocked from ALL the forums while browsing from a different terminal.

LoganSnake 05-23-2008 02:36 PM

Last time I proposed a trading forum, my idea was shut down quite quickly and I was told to go use eBay....http://forums.modojo.com/images/smilies/annoyed.gif

Supporting Xeph.

xepherys 05-23-2008 04:15 PM

I'm glad to see so much support for my proposal. I've used the Buy/Sell forums on a photography-related site I frequent, and they are VERY useful. Plus, it'd be nice to have a community of TFPers to be able to do things like video game trades and such. Obviously nothing illegal, but a lot of legal things that give everyone more bang for their buck (why, sell a 360 game to GameStop for $5 only to turn around and pay $35 for a used copy of the game you want when you can just TRADE the game with someone else?!?)

telekinetic 05-23-2008 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manuel Hong
I like the buy/sell idea too.
All in Favor?

I'm actually surprised that Twistedmosaic's OWSCA proposal isn't already an Act. I never had to operate in "safe mode," but after reading in one of the threads that someone couldn't access TFP at a Panera, it seems to make a lot of sense to have something like that. I'd be bummed if I was blocked from ALL the forums while browsing from a different terminal.

Can I amend my act? It would actually be sweet if you could just go to a different URL entirely. TFPSFW.org or similar. Same login, same database, no NSFW content. Then if IT goes and looks at TFPSFW they don't see anything objectionable. (and it gets around TFP already being blocked places)

Jetée 05-23-2008 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
Last time I proposed a trading forum, my idea was shut down quite quickly and I was told to go use eBay....http://forums.modojo.com/images/smilies/annoyed.gif

Supporting Xeph.

I remember that idea; I remember the responses as well. :no:

It goes to prove promotion and reception are all fickle factors.

dlish 05-24-2008 05:03 AM

1st Congress
1st Session

TFPR-1000000

Part i) The re-introduction and revival of the Aussie forum.

The re-introduction and revival of the now defunct aussie forum. The aussies have been spread far and wide here, and the forum which now sits in the nonsense section isnt visited very often.

no offence, but this forum is as much for aussies as much as it is for americans.

if anything give the aussie forum a small corner somewhere, but not in nonsense!

Part ii) I second xephs motion.
Part iii) I second guccis motion

Daniel_ 05-24-2008 05:58 AM

Can I propose the reinstatement of Nonsense into "Latest Posts", or at least the allowance to customise the "New Posts"view to list whichever fora I want to see?

ironpham 05-24-2008 07:31 AM

I like the Trade Forum one.

And, I thought of a little revision for the NSFW one. Instead of having just the envelopes beside the thread that I have no idea what they mean, change the envelopes into different little messages telling us of it's contents (e.g. NSFW, about work, about games, popular topic, etc.).

MexicanOnABike 05-24-2008 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel_
Can I propose the reinstatement of Nonsense into "Latest Posts", or at least the allowance to customise the "New Posts"view to list whichever fora I want to see?

I 2nd this motion: I would like to remove a few forums that I have never and will never check. So being able to remove these at will would be perfect!! I 2nd this suggestion and bring it toward a vote. who's for the modification of "New post" option?!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ironpham
I like the Trade Forum one.

And, I thought of a little revision for the NSFW one. Instead of having just the envelopes beside the thread that I have no idea what they mean, change the envelopes into different little messages telling us of it's contents (e.g. NSFW, about work, about games, popular topic, etc.).

you mean like fark!? politics, amuzing, dumbass, etc.. haha. sure. why not. but I don't see this making the full forum for long. too many people would skip using the feature. plus, most of these categories are already in their own forum. whereas the NSFW can be in all forums at any time.

LoganSnake 05-24-2008 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willravel
HR0001: Congressional Resolution 1- Establishing The Use of Democratic Votes on Bills before being brought before the POTFP (President of Tilted Forum Project) for veto and for forum leadership.

1st Congress
1st Session

H. RES. 0001

(1) Calling on the TFP government to establish a member's/citizen's right to vote on resolutions and bills before being presented before the President, in order to --
- (a) create a democratic system of government under the oligarchical parliament and supreme chancellor/president; and
- (b) create an experiment which can be referenced by this and other forums as a model or first attempt at a democratically ruled forum
(2) Calling on the TFP government to hold free elections for basic moderators, however still allowing the president, super-moderators, and administrators to choose the candidates, so long as
- (a) there are no hanging chad; and
- (b) the vote is anonymous.

That might have been a good idea if democracy worked on internet forums.

Willravel 05-24-2008 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
That might have been a good idea if democracy worked on internet forums.

The moderation/super-moderation/admins choose the candidates, THEN we vote. That way no one gets in that they don't want it. I see it as a compromise.

LoganSnake 05-24-2008 11:23 AM

Never been a fan of a democratic forum idea.

Willravel 05-24-2008 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
Never been a fan of a democratic forum idea.

What if I send lobbyists?

LoganSnake 05-24-2008 11:40 AM

Same dilemma as with the democracy.

The site has one owner. Changes are made based on whether he likes them or not. He may consider the opinions of the administration and perhaps the regulars or he may not. Democracy might work when the forum is owned by the users who elect the administrator. As long as there is an owner, the forum will be a dictatorship or a faux-democracy at best.

Willravel 05-24-2008 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
Same dilemma as with the democracy.

Yes, my attempt a humor. Really, this is supposed to be a haven for mature and enlightened people. I'm really curious as to whether an election would be about choosing the most capable or the most popular. If an election can't happen here, of all places, what hope does democracy have with people like Texans?
Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
The site has one owner. Changes are made based on whether he likes them or not. He may consider the opinions of the administration and perhaps the regulars or he may not. Democracy might work when the forum is owned by the users who elect the administrator. As long as there is an owner, the forum will be a dictatorship or a faux-democracy at best.

Oligarchy, yes, but TFP is not your average forum. It's not 4chan or somethingawful. Overall, this is a bit of a haven (as I said above). It's what an oligarchy should be, for the most part. And yes, it wouldn't be a true democracy, but there's really no such thing anyway.

MSD 05-24-2008 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willravel
Yes, my attempt a humor. Really, this is supposed to be a haven for mature and enlightened people. I'm really curious as to whether an election would be about choosing the most capable or the most popular. If an election can't happen here, of all places, what hope does democracy have with people like Texans?

TFP has more social cliques that are more prominent than standard electoral politics.

Willravel 05-24-2008 04:08 PM

Ours are only just slightly smaller.

Consider my governor. A man with no political history and really no history of thinking was elected simply because he was popular. And he was married to a Kennedy.

SSJTWIZTA 05-24-2008 05:01 PM

i really enjoy Xepherys' TFP Trade Bill. I would feel much, much safer buying things off of the tfp than almost anywhere else on the net. Shanifaye's idea about having to participate to gain entry to that forum much like some of the others just adds to "safety" feel of it all.

Shauks idea (all though be it a far cry) was most excellent. i second and third that, baby! (i have the power to do that...don't ask why...i just do)

i have no proposal at the moment. maybe ill think of something later on in the night.

Halx 05-27-2008 01:26 PM

Need more bills! need more votes!

RetroGunslinger 05-27-2008 01:31 PM

I'm all for the trade forum. Consider by vote in the proverbial slot.

I'm trying to think of a bill that doesn't involve imprisoning Jews, but it's a bit of a struggle.

Sticky 05-27-2008 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlish
1st Congress
1st Session

TFPR-1000000

Part i) The re-introduction and revival of the Aussie forum.

The re-introduction and revival of the now defunct aussie forum. The aussies have been spread far and wide here, and the forum which now sits in the nonsense section isnt visited very often.

no offence, but this forum is as much for aussies as much as it is for americans.

if anything give the aussie forum a small corner somewhere, but not in nonsense!

Part ii) I second xephs motion.
Part iii) I second guccis motion

...and the Canada Board.

Shauk 05-27-2008 06:02 PM

TFP Bill "Order to the TFP Bill System" hereby known as "SHAUK0002"

A seperate forum is to be created in which forum members can create their own bill in it's own thread with a poll required of "yay" and "nay" as well as a "Write in"

Limited access to those with "members playground" priv's

right now I feel like i'm reading a live transcript of the stock market with everyone lobbying bills at the same time and talking over each other. :p

or you know, people could just use the suggestions forum

RetroGunslinger 05-27-2008 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shauk
TFP Bill "Order to the TFP Bill System" hereby known as "SHAUK0002"

A seperate forum is to be created in which forum members can create their own bill in it's own thread with a poll required of "yay" and "nay" as well as a "Write in"

Limited access to those with "members playground" priv's

right now I feel like i'm reading a live transcript of the stock market with everyone lobbying bills at the same time and talking over each other. :p

or you know, people could just use the suggestions forum

I second the motion.

spectre 05-27-2008 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
Same dilemma as with the democracy.

The site has one owner. Changes are made based on whether he likes them or not. He may consider the opinions of the administration and perhaps the regulars or he may not. Democracy might work when the forum is owned by the users who elect the administrator. As long as there is an owner, the forum will be a dictatorship or a faux-democracy at best.

The bigger issue is that the owner is the one who has to implement the changes. Sometimes they are either impossible or impractical to implement. I'm not saying any of the previously mentioned ones fall into this category, but it can happen.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47