Quote:
Originally posted by Bill O'Rights
It wasn't the Libertarians that cost the Republicans a senate seat in South Dakota, it was the candidate.
|
Exactly Bill. To imply that he
lost the seat imply's that he had some right to it. the best man with the most votes won, it just wasn't him. There's no difference in your argument Ustwo than there is with democrats who sit around and bitch that the Lib's stole votes from Gore.
He obviously didn't represent what the majority wanted.
(watch your tone UsTwo, your sounding like a democrat
)
As for me, I have the same problem i think we all have.
Pro-Choice/Pro-Abortion (yes i said it, but this isn't the thread to argue it)
Pro-Gay right/Pro-gay marriage
Pro-gun
Pro moderate military spending (of course we need to spend money to stay safe, i just don't want more nukes like the new bunker buster and i can't support wasting tax money on a "star wars" system that most admit doesn't work.
We just need another Billion Mr. President. We'll get it right in time! )
Pro-Increased taxes (HA! bet i'm the only one here for that!)
Pro-Fiscal responsability
Pro-Free trade but also support offshoring by companies to lower costs.
Anti-Affirmative action
Pro-Pot criminalization (again, we can argue it another time)
Don't support the Patriot Act
Anti-Religion in government in any form. (I don;t want to hear the word GOD in a state of the union address. Sorry but keep that to you damn self Mr. Bush. Religion is not relevant to politics)
Anti-DCMA
So yea, no party covers where i stand and it bothers me because i feel like Mr.Kerry represents the lesser of of what i want out of a democratic candidate and Mr. Dean I liked, but well he's toast in the media's mind.
I can't in good conscious vote for Mr. Bush based on or different viewpoints on the first two issues.
So I two am left with no candidate. I feel your pain Lebel.