Bush is actually a better debater than people think, and he has a much better grasp on the issues than he did in 2000. He has an odd (to me) sort of appeal that makes people like him. He doesn't come across as superior or high-handed. I look forward to the debates. If Kerry is the nominee, don't sell him short. His debates against William Weld in 1996 were tough, thoughtful and vitally important to his reelection. Although they were a bit repetative on issues. He can loosen up. If the nominee is Edwards, I think Bush will have his hands full. Edwards is a great speaker and can really think on his feet. I have no idea about Clark, but he has not impressed so far. Dean would be interesting because you never know what is going to come out of his mouth - he could score some great points and then jam his foot halfway down his throat on the next question.
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
-Douglas Adams
|