View Single Post
Old 01-16-2004, 08:25 AM   #8 (permalink)
shakran
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by phaedrus
There should be (and is) a limit to the amount of harm you can do someone who is trying to rob you.
Ya know, 3 years ago I would have agreed with you. but the crime rate is skyrocketing, the justice system isn't preventing crime at all, and I keep watching criminals enjoy more rights than victims. Doesn't make sense.

IMHO if you commit a crime against someone else, your rights should be thrown out the window. If you get the shit kicked out of you because you were robbing someone, tough. You shouldn't have been doing that. Maybe next time you'll think twice about stealing shit.

By contrast if you get caught by the cops trying to steal a car you get charged with an attempted crime unless you're actually successful. Bullshit point #1 - who cares if you actually did it or not. If you tried to do it you should be just as punishable as if you did it. Then you get a free lawyer (no problem with that) who points out that you have no prior convictions and the judge should therefore be lenient with you. Bullshit point #2. Is there a BETTER time to enact a harsh penalty? Maybe if you had to do some serious jail time you wouldn't do it again. Then you get probation. Bigtime bullshit #3. What the hell is probation? You committed a crime. You screwed up. You should be in jail for it.

Of course if while attempting to rob the car the owner comes out and hits you AT ALL he not only gets charged with assault and battery (and for some reason his penalty scale is always higher than the true crook) but now YOU, the thief, the crook who was trying to commit a crime, get to sue the owner for hurting you, and you'll probably win. We've probably all heard of that case several years back when the robber was crawling around on the roof of the place he wanted to rob when he fell through a skylight and hurt himself. He sued and won because the skylight wasn't tempered and couldn't hold his weight. Jury apparantly didn't care that the asshole had no business whatsoever being up there, and didn't care that even if he did skylights aren't meant to be crawled on. Thief got a lot of money and the owner got shafted. That is grade A bullshit.

If you catch someone in the act of harming you in ANY way you should be allowed to stop them.


(edit)

btw, if you read farther into the post, seems the guy beat the thief up one night at 2am, and 2 days later the case had gone to trial and concluded. Seems to have been a bullshit topic anyway


Last edited by shakran; 01-16-2004 at 08:36 AM..
shakran is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360