Quote:
Originally posted by feelgood
That's the problem with abortion debates. They got the whole nine yard figured out except, they don't know whether or not they should allow abortion based on a cell organism that will eventually become a baby. But that's not the issue at hand here, the issue at hand here in this thread is what Zorvox should do about it.
|
See, the problem is, that after a certain point, there IS no debate. If they can measure movements, and heartbeat...guess what? It's not just a clump of cells. It's a person. It's got a soul, and mind. It's alive. Personally, there are VERY few situations where I could even think of abortion as a possiblity. And, even in that case, both the man and the woman that created it should have a say.
irateplatypus nailed it on the head with this post:
Quote:
|
motdakasha i have to disagree. if this child was one that they conceived together, then it most definitely concerns him. i'm baffled why many women assume that the man has no say when they want an abortion, yet often demand money/marriage/support when they do want to have the child. Even putting the ethics of abortion aside, neither the man or the woman should take sole command of the child's future (or termination thereof).
|
Nothing could be further from the truth. What people fail to realize is that ADOPTION is the option. If the woman doesn't want the baby, there's plenty of good couples out there who would just LOVE to take the baby in, instead of it getting taken out with the day's garbage.
In MY opinion, those that strongly support abortion have little to no respect for human life. They need a reality check, and quick. Once you can measure a heartbeat, and watch the baby move...if you have an abortion, you've committed murder. That is NOT debatable.