View Single Post
Old 11-20-2003, 09:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
goppers
Tilted
 
When I think about how much money a team would have to pick up in order to take ARod (or manny when i think about him) I try to picture what Vlad is going to get in FA. He is ALMOST the player ARod is, but you don't have to give away prospects or players to get him. I don't picture him getting any more than15 mil in the market. Going by that Texas would have to pay at least 10 mil a year for 6 (or is it 7)years for Arod not to play for them. If they only pay that much a team isn't going to give much in the way of prospects because they are still paying a ton for years down the road. I just see baltimore picking up a big FA and keeping their prospects.

Where I agree totally is that Texas needs money and prospects/pitching. I just don't think they are going to get both. I also think Texas needs money more than they need prospects. This is what makes me think that the mets and boston are the two teams that really have a chance at him since they have the most money to burn.

In the long run Arod for Manny saves the Rangers something like 60 million dollars because of difference in cost and lenght of contract. That's the appeal of it for the Rangers. eventually they do get to use that cash for pitching.

About Nomar - The two places I hear talked about the most are LA and the Angels. I'm not sure who they have for pitching though. From the angels I hear washburn and from the dodgers I here perez. perez is young and cheap though so i don't think that would happen. Oh, and I was wrong', I said trade for an ortiz type that could play left field. I ment pick one up in FA. Really they are flexable there though Millar or possibly Kapplar could do a reasonable job out there. I just bet they will find some guy that can hit .280, 20 home runs, and 70 RBI.

huge texas trade - this actually makes sense dollars wise, but I guess there are a few issues. Boston had all the offense in the world last year, it was their pitching that fell short. Also, Pedro is a 10 5 guy and I really think boston is going to make pedro a life long red sox player. I just don't think boston would try to trade away pitching, even if pedro would allow it.

All of this said, I don't know it this really improves the sox or the rangers. It sure would be interesting though.
goppers is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360