his whole post is wrong on so many levels....
You are advocating a religoius war, a war on Islam. Bombing Mecca has nothing to do with preventing terror.
Quote:
|
Its said were at war; a new kind of war while that may be true it seems to me that sadly the only way things are going to be solved ( or destroyed) is with a major conventional conflict.
|
Didn't people say the exact same things about the war on communism during the cold war?
Quote:
|
I had this idea that a "bluff ?" be created that if another 9/11 happened we would give the appropriate parties notification that they need to clear out of Mecca now because that?s our first retaliation strike. Knowing the consequences perhaps not so many would be keen on helping Osama.
|
You are moving into dangerous territory: religious war. Go ahead, fight terror, but don't start messing with places sacred to hundreds of millions of people. Also, stop talking about terrorists, Muslims in general and citizens of ME countries as one gruop.
Quote:
|
As far as my reply card to them: of the millions of Muslims that you?re referring to what percentage of them do you think would protect Osama if they could? How many do you think would turn him in because of their love and devotion to the US? Why hasn?t he been turned in?
|
So ever muslim knows the location of Osama, but they won't turn him in because they wub him?