|
He stands behind his freedom to take pictures of people entering and leaving the business, but does not think the owner should have the freedom to run their store.
Somewhere the meaning of freedom is lost. He should be forced to prove that the people shopping in the store are the ones committing the crimes he claims to be trying to stop. If he has no proof then he should be the one facing charges of slander against the owner.
I hate hearing about people like this.
__________________
So, what's your point?
It's not an attitude, it's a way of life.
|