Donkeypuncher

Heh. Thank you, Maynard.

If pre-Cambrian man had fucked anything with a pulse (and in a lot of ways, likely did), women would still have been getting impregnated. It's likely there were fewer, if any, social mores governing what was acceptable or not as a sexual partner. There are many species of animal on this planet that exhibit what we call "bisexual" behavior - they're been around for a long time and they're not going anywhere. We keep finding more, too. Evolution doesn't give a crap about sexual preferences as long as enough reproductive activity is happening. Your argument presupposes that there would be such a significant swing in homosexual activity that our species wouldn't survive when it's pretty obvious that man, for a verrrry long time, has quite varied tastes in just about everything. Homosexual activity exists in man's entire recorded history, so there's no reason to think the Romans invented it. They just made a sport out of it.

So... you actually believe it when a woman tells you that you're "thinking with your dick"? Friend, you think with your brain. Your preferences, biases, pre-judgements, fears... they're all in your head. If you hated spinach as a kid but like it now, it's not because your tongue has a will of its own and didn't like the spinach - that is something that happened along the way when you changed your mind. Humans have that. Free will. It's one of the things that distinctly separates us from the other animals crawling around this rock. You either don't like penises, or have been taught from birth that you're not supposed to like them, or some combination of the two... but you could certainly decide to like them one day. Or not. It is your choice. A choice that's made with your brain... and no other part of your body.

__________________
"take me down, little *Susie*, take me down
I know you think you're the Queen of The Underground"