|
Well if you think about it, the point of the bombings is to blow yourself up, and try to take out some innocent bystanders. However they are not always successful. In the end they commit suicide and usually kill a few people at the same time. So if you ask me, its kind of like the is the glass half-empty or half-full question.
Why though, do we feel it's appropriate to condem these actions as cowardly. Do we accept terror more easily if it comes in the form of a man in uniform, with a gun?
__________________
What's easier to believe: that a guy was born without sex in the manner of several Greek demigods and grew up to be able to transmute liquids and alter his body density yet couldn't escape government execution, or that three freemasons in a vehicle made with aluminum foil in an era before digital technology escaped our atmosphere, landing on the moon, broadcasted from there, and then flew back without burning up?
|