Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

bermuDa · 07-01-2003, 02:37 PM

anything sexual involving kids is a sticky subject. Puberty is a confusing time for just about everyone; I remember wanting to see naked girls in junior high school... It was more a rite of passage than satisfying sexual curiosity.

I find it interesting that we (as a society) try to keep our kids from experimenting but at the same time we want them to understand what it is mommy and daddy do when they're alone. There was some legislation introduced a while ago that wanted to start teaching sex ed in elementary school! Even junior high students are mature enough to handle that kind of information!

And of course we've got abercrombie and fitch selling the pre-teen thong, and teen magazines and television shows showcasing impossible physical fitness goals and tips on attracting the opposite sex... but what do we expect these kids to do when they do attract a boy or girl? We're teaching them what sex is and how to go about finding a mate... but at the same time expecting them not to try it out. it's retarded.

I see what you mean, KWSN. When I did finally see a naked girl around my age when I was a kid I didn't feel as dirty as I would if I looked at one now, whether I'd get aroused or not. I think kids are going to experiment no matter what, and teaching them about sex when they're younger is just going to guarantee they'll experiment at earlier ages.

I think kiddie porn is wrong; not because the law says so, but because I don't think kids are mature enough to know about sex, let alone participate in it. these kids are gonna be seriously fucked up when they get older, it's totally wrong for some pervert (be it the pornographer or the viewer) to screw up a kid's future so he can satisfy his own sick desires.

07-01-2003, 02:37 PM	#26 (permalink)
bermuDa don't ignore this--> Location: CA	anything sexual involving kids is a sticky subject. Puberty is a confusing time for just about everyone; I remember wanting to see naked girls in junior high school... It was more a rite of passage than satisfying sexual curiosity. I find it interesting that we (as a society) try to keep our kids from experimenting but at the same time we want them to understand what it is mommy and daddy do when they're alone. There was some legislation introduced a while ago that wanted to start teaching sex ed in elementary school! Even junior high students are mature enough to handle that kind of information! And of course we've got abercrombie and fitch selling the pre-teen thong, and teen magazines and television shows showcasing impossible physical fitness goals and tips on attracting the opposite sex... but what do we expect these kids to do when they do attract a boy or girl? We're teaching them what sex is and how to go about finding a mate... but at the same time expecting them not to try it out. it's retarded. I see what you mean, KWSN. When I did finally see a naked girl around my age when I was a kid I didn't feel as dirty as I would if I looked at one now, whether I'd get aroused or not. I think kids are going to experiment no matter what, and teaching them about sex when they're younger is just going to guarantee they'll experiment at earlier ages. I think kiddie porn is wrong; not because the law says so, but because I don't think kids are mature enough to know about sex, let alone participate in it. these kids are gonna be seriously fucked up when they get older, it's totally wrong for some pervert (be it the pornographer or the viewer) to screw up a kid's future so he can satisfy his own sick desires. __________________ I am the very model of a moderator gentleman.