View Single Post
Old 06-07-2011, 09:36 AM   #12 (permalink)
levite
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Let me put it this way: of all the people I know IRL or in cyberspace, you're probably the most knowledgeable when it comes to all things Judaism, particularly your holy texts. You dedicated years of intense study at institutions of higher learning. You're even a teacher! Isn't it true that there's a lot about your religious texts that you don't know? While you may not be guilty of the kind of slip of spoken about in the OP, like thinking there's some Biblical edict about vaguely erotic vampire fiction, but certainly, even with your truly impressive knowledge, there are still things you have yet to learn or discover, yes? And really, is it fair to expect everyone to get a PhD level education on their religion?

I was a Christian for approximately 14 years and I studied my ass off, and I've studied even more after my de-conversion, but there's still much I don't know about Christianity, it's history, the earlier translations, different theories from different experts. It could take me ten lifetimes to know it all. I know next to nothing about Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, Wicca, Zoroastrianism, Druidism, etc. relative to your average person in that religion.

My long-winded point is maybe you've set the bar too high. Maybe even basic knowledge is sitting the bar too high. Sure, say "That's not actually in the Bible/Torah/Qur'an/etc." when people speak in err, but you're talking about your average person, here, and your average person doesn't take his or her religion seriously. I'm sorry to put it so bluntly, but for most people religion is a back burner kinda thing, an Easter and Christmas (or Chanukkah and Pesach) belief system. They care because their parents pretended to care going back generations.
Of course there's stuff I don't know yet, Will. There will always be stuff I don't know, no matter how hard I study.

But I'm not saying that everyone should have a rabbi's detailed knowledge of the nuance of certain texts, or how to use them to construct arguments in Jewish Law; nor that they should have a PhD's knowledge of the history and deconstruction of the texts, and how to identify from structure and grammar when a piece dates from, and what the theological agenda at that time were.

And if people don't care about their religion, fine. That's their business. But it seems like there are a lot of people walking around who have read only bits and pieces, and either they think that means that they know everything they need to know about the Bible, or they know they don't and they think they should, so they pretend to have a level of knowledge that they don't actually have.

What I am saying is that people who haven't read the Bible, and/or who have not received some basic critical instruction in how it's supposed to be read and understood-- by one's own religion, at least, if not by others that supposedly share parts of the same texts-- should not presume that they know what's in the Bible, or that they know anything about it, and should not represent themselves as such.

For example, I have read the Quran a little. I read it all through a couple of times, in different translations. All that means is that I have a vague idea about what the Quran is about, and a very basic familiarity with Islam. I don't know Arabic: I haven't read it in the original. I have received no real guidance from any trained Muslim scholar. I haven't read any significant portion of the Hadith, or any supporting works of Muslim theology of text, or even any of the responsa literature of Sharia. Strictly speaking, I know jack about the Quran, and relatively little about Islam, and I will be the first person to say so. If I were to (as I'd like to do) take a course, or a little private instruction from a Muslim scholar, then I might feel comfortable saying I had a little basic knowledge of the Quran and Islam.

All I'm saying is that if one has basic knowledge, then one should recognize that that's what one has. And if one has no knowledge, one should acknowledge that that's what one has.

If one cares about religion/the Bible, then take a course or two. If one doesn't, fine, but one shouldn't kid oneself or anyone else about one's knowledge.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)

Last edited by levite; 06-07-2011 at 09:38 AM..
levite is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360