Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy

Notices

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-05-2011, 12:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Actually, that's not in the bible

A CNN article got me thinking...

There are some very nice Jehovah's Witnesses in town and every time I say hello as I pass by their little booth they try to push their literature on me. Not the Bible, not even excerpts from the Bible, as one would expect but propaganda pamphlets filled with such trash that even one as poorly educated on scripture as myself sees the obvious flaws. These pamphlets cover everything from evolution, vampires, end of the world to dealing with cancer and pretty much anything that one would often see on the news. All these topics are poorly mashed together with scripture in an attempt to make the Bible relevant for today's world.

I'm a curious man, so now and then, I talk to these people about their faith. It quickly struck me that 99% of what they discuss comes directly from these pamphlets and magazines. They are brain washed and know as much if not less about their own scripture than a heathen soul such as myself. At the same time they keep themselves insulated from the world of science and history. They are in intellectual purgatory!


Actually, that's not in the Bible – CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs
Quote:
By John Blake, CNN

(CNN) – NFL legend Mike Ditka was giving a news conference one day after being fired as the coach of the Chicago Bears when he decided to quote the Bible.

“Scripture tells you that all things shall pass,” a choked-up Ditka said after leading his team to only five wins during the previous season. “This, too, shall pass.”

Ditka fumbled his biblical citation, though. The phrase “This, too, shall pass” doesn’t appear in the Bible. Ditka was quoting a phantom scripture that sounds like it belongs in the Bible, but look closer and it’s not there.

Ditka’s biblical blunder is as common as preachers delivering long-winded public prayers. The Bible may be the most revered book in America, but it’s also one of the most misquoted. Politicians, motivational speakers, coaches - all types of people - quote passages that actually have no place in the Bible, religious scholars say.

These phantom passages include:

“God helps those who help themselves.”

“Spare the rod, spoil the child.”

And there is this often-cited paraphrase: Satan tempted Eve to eat the forbidden apple in the Garden of Eden.

None of those passages appear in the Bible, and one is actually anti-biblical, scholars say.

But people rarely challenge them because biblical ignorance is so pervasive that it even reaches groups of people who should know better, says Steve Bouma-Prediger, a religion professor at Hope College in Holland, Michigan.

“In my college religion classes, I sometimes quote 2 Hesitations 4:3 (‘There are no internal combustion engines in heaven’),” Bouma-Prediger says. “I wait to see if anyone realizes that there is no such book in the Bible and therefore no such verse.

“Only a few catch on.”

Few catch on because they don’t want to - people prefer knowing biblical passages that reinforce their pre-existing beliefs, a Bible professor says.

“Most people who profess a deep love of the Bible have never actually read the book,” says Rabbi Rami Shapiro, who once had to persuade a student in his Bible class at Middle Tennessee State University that the saying “this dog won’t hunt” doesn’t appear in the Book of Proverbs.

“They have memorized parts of texts that they can string together to prove the biblical basis for whatever it is they believe in,” he says, “but they ignore the vast majority of the text."

Phantom biblical passages work in mysterious ways

Ignorance isn’t the only cause for phantom Bible verses. Confusion is another.

Some of the most popular faux verses are pithy paraphrases of biblical concepts or bits of folk wisdom.

Consider these two:

“God works in mysterious ways.”

“Cleanliness is next to Godliness.”

Both sound as if they are taken from the Bible, but they’re not. The first is a paraphrase of a 19th century hymn by the English poet William Cowper (“God moves in a mysterious way, His wonders to perform).

The “cleanliness” passage was coined by John Wesley, the 18th century evangelist who founded Methodism, says Thomas Kidd, a history professor at Baylor University in Texas.

“No matter if John Wesley or someone else came up with a wise saying - if it sounds proverbish, people figure it must come from the Bible,” Kidd says.

Our fondness for the short and tweet-worthy may also explain our fondness for phantom biblical phrases. The pseudo-verses function like theological tweets: They’re pithy summarizations of biblical concepts.

“Spare the rod, spoil the child” falls into that category. It’s a popular verse - and painful for many kids. Could some enterprising kid avoid the rod by pointing out to his mother that it's not in the Bible?

It’s doubtful. Her possible retort: The popular saying is a distillation of Proverbs 13:24: “The one who withholds [or spares] the rod is one who hates his son.”

Another saying that sounds Bible-worthy: “Pride goes before a fall.” But its approximation, Proverbs 16:18, is actually written: “Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.”

There are some phantom biblical verses for which no excuse can be offered. The speaker goofed.

That’s what Bruce Wells, a theology professor, thinks happened to Ditka, the former NFL coach, when he strayed from the gridiron to biblical commentary during his 1993 press conference in Chicago.

Wells watched Ditka’s biblical blunder on local television when he lived in Chicago. After Ditka cited the mysterious passage, reporters scrambled unsuccessfully the next day to find the biblical source.

They should have consulted Wells, who is now director of the ancient studies program at Saint Joseph’s University in Pennsylvania. Wells says Ditka’s error probably came from a peculiar feature of the King James Bible.

“My hunch on the Ditka quote is that it comes from a quirk of the King James translation,” Wells says. “Ancient Hebrew had a particular way of saying things like, ‘and the next thing that happened was…’ The King James translators of the Old Testament consistently rendered this as ‘and it came to pass.’ ’’

When phantom Bible passages turn dangerous

People may get verses wrong, but they also mangle plenty of well-known biblical stories as well.

Two examples: The scripture never says a whale swallowed Jonah, the Old Testament prophet, nor did any New Testament passages say that three wise men visited baby Jesus, scholars say.

Those details may seem minor, but scholars say one popular phantom Bible story stands above the rest: The Genesis story about the fall of humanity.

Most people know the popular version - Satan in the guise of a serpent tempts Eve to pick the forbidden apple from the Tree of Life. It’s been downhill ever since.

But the story in the book of Genesis never places Satan in the Garden of Eden.

“Genesis mentions nothing but a serpent,” says Kevin Dunn, chair of the department of religion at Tufts University in Massachusetts.

“Not only does the text not mention Satan, the very idea of Satan as a devilish tempter postdates the composition of the Garden of Eden story by at least 500 years,” Dunn says.

Getting biblical scriptures and stories wrong may not seem significant, but it can become dangerous, one scholar says.

Most people have heard this one: “God helps those that help themselves.” It’s another phantom scripture that appears nowhere in the Bible, but many people think it does. It's actually attributed to Benjamin Franklin, one of the nation's founding fathers.

The passage is popular in part because it is a reflection of cherished American values: individual liberty and self-reliance, says Sidnie White Crawford, a religious studies scholar at the University of Nebraska.

Yet that passage contradicts the biblical definition of goodness: defining one’s worth by what one does for others, like the poor and the outcast, Crawford says.

Crawford cites a scripture from Leviticus that tells people that when they harvest the land, they should leave some “for the poor and the alien” (Leviticus 19:9-10), and another passage from Deuteronomy that declares that people should not be “tight-fisted toward your needy neighbor.”

“We often infect the Bible with our own values and morals, not asking what the Bible’s values and morals really are,” Crawford says.

Where do these phantom passages come from?

It’s easy to blame the spread of phantom biblical passages on pervasive biblical illiteracy. But the causes are varied and go back centuries.

Some of the guilty parties are anonymous, lost to history. They are artists and storytellers who over the years embellished biblical stories and passages with their own twists.

If, say, you were an anonymous artist painting the Garden of Eden during the Renaissance, why not portray the serpent as the devil to give some punch to your creation? And if you’re a preacher telling a story about Jonah, doesn’t it just sound better to say that Jonah was swallowed by a whale, not a “great fish”?

Others blame the spread of phantom Bible passages on King James, or more specifically the declining popularity of the King James translation of the Bible.

That translation, which marks 400 years of existence this year, had a near monopoly on the Bible market as recently as 50 years ago, says Douglas Jacobsen, a professor of church history and theology at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“If you quoted the Bible and got it wrong then, people were more likely to notice because there was only one text,” he says. “Today, so many different translations are used that almost no one can tell for sure if something supposedly from the Bible is being quoted accurately or not.”

Others blame the spread of phantom biblical verses on Martin Luther, the German monk who ignited the Protestant Reformation, the massive “protest” against the excesses of the Roman Catholic Church that led to the formation of Protestant church denominations.

“It is a great Protestant tradition for anyone - milkmaid, cobbler, or innkeeper - to be able to pick up the Bible and read for herself. No need for a highly trained scholar or cleric to walk a lay person through the text,” says Craig Hazen, director of the Christian Apologetics program at Biola University in Southern California.

But often the milkmaid, the cobbler - and the NFL coach - start creating biblical passages without the guidance of biblical experts, he says.

“You can see this manifest today in living room Bible studies across North America where lovely Christian people, with no training whatsoever, drink decaf, eat brownies and ask each other, ‘What does this text mean to you?’’’ Hazen says.

“Not only do they get the interpretation wrong, but very often end up quoting verses that really aren’t there.”
Mantus is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 02:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
An excellent article that points to the many flaws of those that hold something dear but don't understand or haven't read the source material.

I find this is common error for any kind of "quoted" material, not just books, but movies, tv shows, and speeches.

When I was actually in bible studies, I used to like when the JWs would talk to me about such things and I'd quote actual verse to counter their statements and ask them where they got their quotes from. Most were like the article mentions, they did not know, did not understand what they were reading, or even what they did get was from no biblical scholar but someone who was equally ignorant.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 03:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Man, it's about time someone pointed this out.

I have to correct my students all the time about what they think is in the Bible and what isn't. If I'm lucky, it's only to correct them that something they quote as Biblical actually comes from Christian scriptures, which Jews of course do not count as Biblical scripture, or from later Christian thought, which again we don't accept theologically; but usually, it's just something bizarre that somehow they got into their heads was from the Bible.

I had a high school student who swore up and down to me that democracy came from the Bible. And I had an adult student (for a conversion class) that legitimately thought that it was prohibited by the Bible for Jews to eat soy bacon or vegetarian chicken with cheese, because not only can we not eat nonkosher foods, "we can't eat anything that resembles them!" (Untrue, and weird.)

Not to mention, of course, the legions of students who are convinced that the Bible prohibits masturbation (it doesn't), or sex before marriage (it doesn't), or suchlike....

After college, when I was very poor, and had no budget for entertainment, I used to entertain myself by going over to the main street of the town, where lots of missionaries hung out, and I would debate them, and find the errors in their scholarship, or the holes in their theology. I remember with some amusement once causing great dismay to a couple of young Jehovah's Witnesses by explaining to them how the name "Jehovah" is a misnomer-- a total error-- caused by Latin translators and German academics misunderstanding the Hebrew name, for which the pronunciation was lost long before the end of the Second Temple period....
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)
levite is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 09:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
To be fair, religious texts such as the Torah, New Testament, and Qur'an are quite long and intricate. I've studied them for many years, and even with the benefit of not being in the religions (which means I come at all of them from the same perspective), and I'm still only a novice. While I can understand panties getting tied in knots over silly things like democracy or capitalism in the Bible, there are mistakes even highly educated people make.

And really, for many people there's no difference between getting their information from the original text and a pamphlet. It's all appeal to authority. Even if something is in the Bible, that doesn't necessarily make it true, case in point the stationary earth theory from Job chapter 38.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 03:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
Upright
 
Mathilda's Avatar
 
Location: Finland
While "Spare the rod spoil the child" isn't in the bible in those words, what is, isn't that different and imo at least as disturbing.

"He who spareth the rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him correcteth him betimes" (Proverbs 13:24)
Mathilda is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 05:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
People in masks cannot be trusted
 
Xazy's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
Great article.

I tend to make up on quote from the bible "thou shalt cover thy ass" surprisingly some people actually think that is a real quote.

The one other thing that is rarely discussed is that today's bible is not even a translation from Hebrew the original language to English, but a translation of a translation.
__________________
Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.
Xazy is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
To be fair, religious texts such as the Torah, New Testament, and Qur'an are quite long and intricate. I've studied them for many years, and even with the benefit of not being in the religions (which means I come at all of them from the same perspective), and I'm still only a novice. While I can understand panties getting tied in knots over silly things like democracy or capitalism in the Bible, there are mistakes even highly educated people make.

And really, for many people there's no difference between getting their information from the original text and a pamphlet. It's all appeal to authority. Even if something is in the Bible, that doesn't necessarily make it true, case in point the stationary earth theory from Job chapter 38.
It's all part and parcel of the same problem. Seems like a lot of folks don't even read the entire Tanakh (Bible) let alone learn how to read and interpret it properly. I can't speak for the Christian Scriptures or the Quran, of course, but the Tanakh, at least, wasn't designed to be read in a vacuum. It was designed to be read as part of an integrated oral corpus of traditional understandings; and barring instruction in doing so, reading it on its own is like reading every third line of "Hamlet" and then wondering why the play makes so little sense.

It's shocking to me not only how many people forget that they are reading a work that was composed in another language (one very, very different from English) over the course of a thousand years, incorporating numerous different viewpoints-- all generally different from the modern, Euro-American viewpoints; but who simply don't realize that things which we take for granted in other kinds of literature are also present in the Scriptures: metaphor, simile, hyperbole, idiom, allusion, allegory, poetic imagery, puns, and all the things we would expect from the great works. Somehow, many people think that those kinds of literary devices are somehow "below" the Bible. But there is nothing lowly about them: they make for great literature, and the Bible uses them freely. Not only are they often misread and overlooked, but often, as Xazy alluded to, they are not even translated properly, and then those translations are themselves retranslated and recast for modern readers.

It's a morass.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)
levite is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
I am guilty of saying "fuck 'em if they can't take a joke -- as it says in the bible".
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 05:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_ View Post
I am guilty of saying "fuck 'em if they can't take a joke -- as it says in the bible".
Awesome!
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)
levite is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 06:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by levite View Post
It's all part and parcel of the same problem. Seems like a lot of folks don't even read the entire Tanakh (Bible) let alone learn how to read and interpret it properly. I can't speak for the Christian Scriptures or the Quran, of course, but the Tanakh, at least, wasn't designed to be read in a vacuum. It was designed to be read as part of an integrated oral corpus of traditional understandings; and barring instruction in doing so, reading it on its own is like reading every third line of "Hamlet" and then wondering why the play makes so little sense.

It's shocking to me not only how many people forget that they are reading a work that was composed in another language (one very, very different from English) over the course of a thousand years, incorporating numerous different viewpoints-- all generally different from the modern, Euro-American viewpoints; but who simply don't realize that things which we take for granted in other kinds of literature are also present in the Scriptures: metaphor, simile, hyperbole, idiom, allusion, allegory, poetic imagery, puns, and all the things we would expect from the great works. Somehow, many people think that those kinds of literary devices are somehow "below" the Bible. But there is nothing lowly about them: they make for great literature, and the Bible uses them freely. Not only are they often misread and overlooked, but often, as Xazy alluded to, they are not even translated properly, and then those translations are themselves retranslated and recast for modern readers.

It's a morass.
Let me put it this way: of all the people I know IRL or in cyberspace, you're probably the most knowledgeable when it comes to all things Judaism, particularly your holy texts. You dedicated years of intense study at institutions of higher learning. You're even a teacher! Isn't it true that there's a lot about your religious texts that you don't know? While you may not be guilty of the kind of slip of spoken about in the OP, like thinking there's some Biblical edict about vaguely erotic vampire fiction, but certainly, even with your truly impressive knowledge, there are still things you have yet to learn or discover, yes? And really, is it fair to expect everyone to get a PhD level education on their religion?

I was a Christian for approximately 14 years and I studied my ass off, and I've studied even more after my de-conversion, but there's still much I don't know about Christianity, it's history, the earlier translations, different theories from different experts. It could take me ten lifetimes to know it all. I know next to nothing about Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, Wicca, Zoroastrianism, Druidism, etc. relative to your average person in that religion.

My long-winded point is maybe you've set the bar too high. Maybe even basic knowledge is sitting the bar too high. Sure, say "That's not actually in the Bible/Torah/Qur'an/etc." when people speak in err, but you're talking about your average person, here, and your average person doesn't take his or her religion seriously. I'm sorry to put it so bluntly, but for most people religion is a back burner kinda thing, an Easter and Christmas (or Chanukkah and Pesach) belief system. They care because their parents pretended to care going back generations.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 01:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Sheepy's Avatar
 
Location: Hometown at Great Barrier Island, NZ
I don't know much, but from what i understand is that with the general people there is also a general message in The Bible. The most dominating are those to do with poverty, justice, grace faith but mostly love! - Corinthians 13.



simplicity is the ultimate form of sophistication!
Sheepy is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 09:36 AM   #12 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Let me put it this way: of all the people I know IRL or in cyberspace, you're probably the most knowledgeable when it comes to all things Judaism, particularly your holy texts. You dedicated years of intense study at institutions of higher learning. You're even a teacher! Isn't it true that there's a lot about your religious texts that you don't know? While you may not be guilty of the kind of slip of spoken about in the OP, like thinking there's some Biblical edict about vaguely erotic vampire fiction, but certainly, even with your truly impressive knowledge, there are still things you have yet to learn or discover, yes? And really, is it fair to expect everyone to get a PhD level education on their religion?

I was a Christian for approximately 14 years and I studied my ass off, and I've studied even more after my de-conversion, but there's still much I don't know about Christianity, it's history, the earlier translations, different theories from different experts. It could take me ten lifetimes to know it all. I know next to nothing about Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, Wicca, Zoroastrianism, Druidism, etc. relative to your average person in that religion.

My long-winded point is maybe you've set the bar too high. Maybe even basic knowledge is sitting the bar too high. Sure, say "That's not actually in the Bible/Torah/Qur'an/etc." when people speak in err, but you're talking about your average person, here, and your average person doesn't take his or her religion seriously. I'm sorry to put it so bluntly, but for most people religion is a back burner kinda thing, an Easter and Christmas (or Chanukkah and Pesach) belief system. They care because their parents pretended to care going back generations.
Of course there's stuff I don't know yet, Will. There will always be stuff I don't know, no matter how hard I study.

But I'm not saying that everyone should have a rabbi's detailed knowledge of the nuance of certain texts, or how to use them to construct arguments in Jewish Law; nor that they should have a PhD's knowledge of the history and deconstruction of the texts, and how to identify from structure and grammar when a piece dates from, and what the theological agenda at that time were.

And if people don't care about their religion, fine. That's their business. But it seems like there are a lot of people walking around who have read only bits and pieces, and either they think that means that they know everything they need to know about the Bible, or they know they don't and they think they should, so they pretend to have a level of knowledge that they don't actually have.

What I am saying is that people who haven't read the Bible, and/or who have not received some basic critical instruction in how it's supposed to be read and understood-- by one's own religion, at least, if not by others that supposedly share parts of the same texts-- should not presume that they know what's in the Bible, or that they know anything about it, and should not represent themselves as such.

For example, I have read the Quran a little. I read it all through a couple of times, in different translations. All that means is that I have a vague idea about what the Quran is about, and a very basic familiarity with Islam. I don't know Arabic: I haven't read it in the original. I have received no real guidance from any trained Muslim scholar. I haven't read any significant portion of the Hadith, or any supporting works of Muslim theology of text, or even any of the responsa literature of Sharia. Strictly speaking, I know jack about the Quran, and relatively little about Islam, and I will be the first person to say so. If I were to (as I'd like to do) take a course, or a little private instruction from a Muslim scholar, then I might feel comfortable saying I had a little basic knowledge of the Quran and Islam.

All I'm saying is that if one has basic knowledge, then one should recognize that that's what one has. And if one has no knowledge, one should acknowledge that that's what one has.

If one cares about religion/the Bible, then take a course or two. If one doesn't, fine, but one shouldn't kid oneself or anyone else about one's knowledge.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)

Last edited by levite; 06-07-2011 at 09:38 AM..
levite is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:21 AM   #13 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
Quote:
Originally Posted by levite View Post
Awesome!
Well if it's not there, it bloody well should be!
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 02:47 PM   #14 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
My host-mum used to waste their time telling them they were stupid. At the time I never knew she was so smart, nor that she had such an excellent sense of humor.
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 03:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
Addict
 
Shadowex3's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by levite View Post
I had a high school student who swore up and down to me that democracy came from the Bible. And I had an adult student (for a conversion class) that legitimately thought that it was prohibited by the Bible for Jews to eat soy bacon or vegetarian chicken with cheese, because not only can we not eat nonkosher foods, "we can't eat anything that resembles them!" (Untrue, and weird.)

Not to mention, of course, the legions of students who are convinced that the Bible prohibits masturbation (it doesn't), or sex before marriage (it doesn't), or suchlike....
This is what happens when people go reading the Talmud without any context or background. They get to something like Marit Ayin and somewhere in six pages of rabbinical argument and thought exercises they somehow come to the conclusion that it's divine law.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hectonkhyres
I'm imagining crazed dwarves doing profoundly weird things. Urist McNutcase has developed a compulsion to jam anything colored blue up his anus, or alternately other peoples anuses
Shadowex3 is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 01:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowex3 View Post
This is what happens when people go reading the Talmud without any context or background. They get to something like Marit Ayin and somewhere in six pages of rabbinical argument and thought exercises they somehow come to the conclusion that it's divine law.
You...just rocked my world!
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)
levite is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 01:39 PM   #17 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
Thou shalt not talk about your naughty bits in public.
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 03:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
Addict
 
Shadowex3's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by levite View Post
You...just rocked my world!
I've met a LOT of people who were messianic or gentiles that were self proclaimed "noahides" trying to convert that have the exact same misconceptions you mentioned, and even more, because they try to jump straight to torah and talmud study and just get their head broke. I think the wierdest stuff comes from anyone dicking with the kabbalah that starts thinking it's as "official" as the torah.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hectonkhyres
I'm imagining crazed dwarves doing profoundly weird things. Urist McNutcase has developed a compulsion to jam anything colored blue up his anus, or alternately other peoples anuses
Shadowex3 is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 08:04 PM   #19 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowex3 View Post
I've met a LOT of people who were messianic or gentiles that were self proclaimed "noahides" trying to convert that have the exact same misconceptions you mentioned, and even more, because they try to jump straight to torah and talmud study and just get their head broke. I think the wierdest stuff comes from anyone dicking with the kabbalah that starts thinking it's as "official" as the torah.
You don't really have to be 40 to study Kabbalah, but it really isn't for beginners. You have to really be able to understand when and where to apply Kabbalistic knowledge, and to get that what is at the most mystical levels of understanding isn't always something that can be brought up into the light for everyday uses. I always teach that there is a pyramid of knowledge that must be built up: first Torah knowledge, along with knowledge of the commentaries; then liturgy (history, text, and practice); then Talmud and the skills of Rabbinic thought; then halakhah (practical law) and aggadah (exegetical parable); then legal theory and various philosophies (mussar [moralistic homiletics), Hasidut [ecstatic semi-mystical theology], and modern Jewish thought); and only when one has achieved a certain level of competence with all those things, Kabbalah.

Failure to understand context is, IMO, responsible for many, if not most, causal errors in understanding and interpretation when it comes to sacred text and theology.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)
levite is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 09:41 AM   #20 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
Accepting revealed truth requires failing to understand its context. No text is sacred, but that's not in the Bible, either. OMG! I capitalized Bible. One might as well be a Mormon... I hope you're not implying, levite, that whatever truths there are in the writings don't have to be extrapolated & therefore don't become different for all?
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 05:20 PM   #21 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ourcrazymodern? View Post
Accepting revealed truth requires failing to understand its context.
That depends very much on how one defines "revealed truth." If you mean fundamentalist literalism, then yes, you're right. But since most religious people are not fundamentalist literalists, then no, I'm not sure it is true.

Although what I was referring to was the context of the writings within the tradition, history, and culture (both social and literary) that produced them.

Quote:
No text is sacred, but that's not in the Bible, either.
No single text is universally understood as inherently sacred, perhaps. But texts can be and are sacred to their adherents. You may not find the Tanakh (Hebrew scriptures) to be holy: fine, that is surely your prerogative, and nobody would have any business trying to change your mind. But those texts are sacred to the Jewish people, and to us they certainly are understood to have an inherent holiness. Of course, Judaism also teaches that Jewish sacred text was meant only for us: it is not relevant to non-Jews, whom we presume to have their own ways of interacting with God and passing on holy teachings (which, in turn, are not relevant to us).

Quote:
I hope you're not implying, levite, that whatever truths there are in the writings don't have to be extrapolated & therefore don't become different for all?
All text has to be interpreted. But what I am talking about is the difference between (1) How did the authors of the text and their redactor successors understand the text, (2) How does the culture which produced the text understand the text, and (3) How can any casual reader of the text from outside its original cultural context interpret it and find meaning in it.

For example, let's say with the plays of Shakespeare: one can reasonably speculate on the kinds of meanings Shakespeare was likely to have imagined when he wrote "Hamlet." In doing so, one can readily defend a comparatively wide range of possible meanings, as it is an exceedingly complex play. And one can also consider how British (and to an extent, American) directors, actors, and audiences have interpreted the play, and what kinds of meanings they have decided to adapt into it. And while one is free to assign any meaning one likes to a play, one would be very hard pressed to make a case that, say, Shakespeare and his players at the Globe intended that "Hamlet" be a strong statement on gun control and the consequences of abusing the Second Amendment. If that's how one wants to read "Hamlet," that's surely one's right, and no one should take that right away; but such a reading, though interesting, is simply insupportable in the contexts both of the play's author's likely ideas and motivations, and in the predominate traditions of interpretation of the play.

There is a Rabbinic teaching about interpreting Torah: hafokh ba v'hafokh ba, ki d'kula ba; "Examine and re-examine it, for everything can be found within it." In other words, Rabbinic tradition presumes that the Torah is capable of infinite levels of meaning. Yet even so, there are meanings that, practically, we teach that the text will not support, and it is not permissible in Judaism to make those textual arguments. If one makes them, fine, that may be a way to interpret the text, but it is no longer Jewish.

Christians do this all the time: most of how they interpret the "Old Testament" is counter to what Judaism says one can do with the text. But Jews generally have no problem with Christians doing this, so long as they are clear that they are Christians, interpreting the texts Christologically. The only problem comes when the Christians claim supercessionary rights of interpretation, and tell us that our readings and parameters are wrong, and theirs are the "true" Jewish readings, because they are now the "real" Children of Israel.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)

Last edited by levite; 06-09-2011 at 05:22 PM..
levite is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 08:29 AM   #22 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
Color me blushing, except! I don't know how, & your use of "they" also differs from mine. I try not to use that word, but think IJUHP, & try to figure out how others reckon they're so much different. If I take multiple liberties with my interpretations, I strongly suspect others do the same. Being absolutely sure is not one of my wonts. According to Herbert W. Armstrong, I might be descended from one of the lost tribes, except that that migration came from the south & east, &???

"Sacred" "holiness" is way, way a matter of opinion. Groupthink trips us up more effectively than thinking as individuals. Maybe the story of The Tower of Babel was one of God's brighter ideas which hasn't yet been interpreted well? Maybe not.

Co-opting the "OT" to continue/engender new traditions strikes me as no more silly than some of the other editing our species attempts every day, as agreements are reached, only to be abandoned as quickly. The Quran (sp?) is the Bible is the Torah, expanded, & they're all bastardizations of life, rarely as poetic as Shakespeare.

I stand by & for our mutual happiness.
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
Old 07-17-2011, 06:41 PM   #23 (permalink)
Upright
 
"God helps those who help themselves" is a famous Ben Franklin line, a pithy way of observing that prayer plus hard work tends to produce better results than prayer alone.

Given that he was poking fun at overly religous types, I'm sure he'd be highly amused to learn that some people now think it's from the Bible.
JamesD is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 07:53 AM   #24 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
Looking at a sparkly mineral,
entrancement has its charms which aren't amusing.
God does help those who help each other.

So much, extrapolated,
from the sacred texts to which we cling,
tend to disserve us, wildly.
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
 

Tags
actuall, bibble


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360