Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
In terms of what? Economic impact? Permanent exclusion zone? Environmental impact?
Chernobyl honestly didn't have that great of an environmental impact outside of the immediate vicinity. There was some radiation in Central and Western Europe, but nothing that was of an immediate health concern (in retrospect).
Fukishima has the potential to contaminate the Pacific, and not just the immediate area.
|
You are correct. can you imagine the radiation levels 15 miles off the coast in 6 months? espically after there dumping all of the containmented water back into the ocean.
all i ment was the enviromental impact in the immediate vicinity. I read in the paper this morning that were sending a giant cement truck on a plane to japan to help with efforts???
__________________
tomorrow i'm taking me fishing, hang a sign on the door of my life,
tell the world i've gone missing and i wont be back for a while.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ourcrazymodern?
Don't go to work for anybody who cares about anything other than your work performance. Such prejudiced idiots will never profit you.
|