Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt
Dude. Don't blame me, blame the malthusian growth model of faggotry, where f(x)=gayness^x. And leave Mr. Geisel out of this. That man was a genius who ate unicorns for breakfast and shit out trisyllabic gold.
|
This is why you’ll never make assistant manager, Mr. Sobchak. Your EO complaints are stacked taller than Wilt Chamberlain.
You know how I know you're gay? Math jokes.
...
Kinda related: Fuck Virginia Tech.
...
Dude, you're a rifle snob. The first step is admitting it. And it's okay with us. We like it. We want to learn. But pushing the idea of a custom turnbolt on a gentleman that hasn't shot anything at farther than like 300 meter (Ivans at that)? GTFO, Boscoe. There's a difference between starting with something too cheap to do you justice from a training standpoint and something that's way outta your ability to the point you don't even notice the difference.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Walt
But if you want to do serious precision stuff, you are going to need a rifle that will always be better than you are - when I blow a shot, I know that the fault is on me, rather than the rifle.
|
I just don't think he's there yet. And I don't think he needs to invest in a piece that can do that yet either. Not if a factory gun has a good chance of doing it acceptably until he accumulates enough trigger time to say, "I need a better rifle." I mean, I'm sure as fuck not going to pay a Dwarven Harley rider (typical gunsmith) to build me a Carlos Hathcock special when it comes time for me to pony up the Benjies for a 600+ meter rifle. I’m looking at getting a factory police-guy-with-black-outfit Savage in .308 (until I read some article that says they're turn-to-dust-in-your-hands turds). Thoughts?
You've got the persuasive argument that only comes from experience, Walt. But where did you start from? That's where we're at here.