Thread: sex as a drug
View Single Post
Old 12-20-2010, 02:02 AM   #8 (permalink)
Makhnov
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlish View Post
Your narcissism is drenched in every comment of your OP. Good luck trying to find people willing to participate in the circlejerk thread you're inviting them to.

The fact that you ask for posts only from people who agree with you speaks volumes.
Speak volumes. In what way does it speak volumes? I have already heard, understood, and digested and contemplated the position of the married romantics on this forum. I didn't want to hear from them because I did not want to re-hash it all over again. That's all.

Are these people going to keep repeating themselves every time I make a thread? When is that going to get old for them? It is become old and tired for me already.

---------- Post added at 01:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 PM ----------

(Now a message to the everyone in the thread, since this place "attaches" follow ups onto the proceeding message)

I am a human being with ten fingers and ten toes. I cannot fathom that my understanding of the nature of men's biologically sexuality is so absolutely contrary to what all of you are saying. It is just not plausible in my mind that I am that different from all of you. There seems to be something about your sexuality which you are not admitting to or being honest about in its true manifestation.

The set of biological stimuli required for a man's body to complete a sex act does not seem to contain within itself these various aspects of which you are demanding I conjure up for some reason. You are going to have to tell me exactly why you demand I conjure up these things. These reasons appear to be solely political or cultural; in any case, none of you are stating them in clear english. In the thread that cynthetiq decided to lock on me, we have the example of Iris. She had group sex with five black men and later described the experience as unforseen types of euphoria. There was no romance in the act, and in modern times, it would be considered very dangerous. Iris's experience annihilates any faux argument about sex acts requiring care, mutuality, or even a feeling of safety.

We could possibly live in a universe in which a man's body cannot complete a sex act unless he feels complete trust and emotional connection with his partner. We don't live in that universe. Do we?

If the true nature of men's sexuality looks more like a criminal assault than it does a marriage ceremony -- if that is the case, do not point your anger at me. Take your anger out on God, or on evolution, or wherever it is you think humanity sprang from.
Makhnov is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360