Kick Ass Kunoichi
|
Entrapment or saving us from terrorism?
This is a question I've had for a couple weeks now, ever since the FBI arrested Mohamed Mohamud for an attempted bombing at Pioneer Courthouse Square in Portland (read more here: FBI thwarts terrorist bombing attempt at Portland holiday tree lighting, authorities say | OregonLive.com). For those who don't know, Mohamed Mohamud was a sometimes student at the university I graduated from, so this story is very close to home, and it has been kind of surreal to have this all going on in my own backyard. It's also strange to have people overreact and declare that everyone at the treelighting could have died--um, no, they couldn't have, the bomb was a fake. I've had a lot of problems with the language used in the media to describe this case; take the article I posted above. The headline is "FBI thwarts terrorist bombing attempt at Portland holiday tree lighting, authorities say"--in my mind, the FBI didn't thwart anything; they gave a guy a fake bomb, after all.
There was a piece in the NYTimes wherein AG Holder says that these kinds of stings are necessary to protect the American people from terrorism.
Quote:
Holder Tells Muslim Group Stings Are ‘Essential’
By MALIA WOLLAN and CHARLIE SAVAGE
MILLBRAE, Calif. — Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. defended the use of sting operations orchestrated by government informants, telling advocates for Muslim-American civil rights in remarks on Friday night that the tactic is an “essential law enforcement tool in uncovering and preventing terror attacks.”
In a 20-minute speech delivered in this suburb of San Francisco at the annual dinner of Muslim Advocates, a national legal advocacy and civil-rights organization, Mr. Holder rejected criticism by such groups that sting operations amount to improper “entrapment.” click to show
About 300 Muslim community leaders from around the United States attended the dinner. Having a United States attorney general speak at such an event was unprecedented, the group’s president, Farhana Khera, said in an interview earlier on Friday.
Mr. Holder was given a standing ovation as he took the stage, and many applauded during his speech. But the room fell silent for several minutes while Mr. Holder defended the sting operation in an Oregon bombing attempt last month, calling it a “successful undercover operation” and not a case of entrapment. Those who think otherwise, he said, “simply do not have their facts straight.”
Ms. Khera said the group had invited the attorney general several months ago. She portrayed the Muslim-American community as torn by a mistrust of law enforcement because of what it sees as intrusive surveillance and harassment — like sending informants into mosques — and by its concerns about anti-Muslim hate crimes.
Mr. Holder said the cooperation of Muslim-Americans had been essential in preventing terrorist attacks. He said that the Justice Department was focusing on “violence, threats, vandalism and arson against Muslims and Arab-Americans,” and that in the last fiscal year federal prosecutors won convictions of more hate-crime defendants than any year but 2000.
“I believe that law enforcement has an obligation to ensure that members of every religious community enjoy the ability to worship and to practice their faith in peace, free from intimidation, violence or suspicion,” Mr. Holder said.
But he also rejected criticism of some counterterrorism techniques used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, including sending informants into mosques in search of would-be terrorists and creating elaborate sting operations enabling them to carry out fake attacks using dummy bombs.
Ms. Khera emphasized that Muslim Advocates recognized that “there are actual threats that do exist and as Americans who care about the country, we want law enforcement to be effective.”
But the complex “entrapment operations,” she contended, may be getting people involved in terrorism who otherwise would not have done anything. She also argued that the operations divert investigators from “actual threats” and stoke “anti-Muslim sentiment.”
At a reception after the speech, many in the audience voiced their gratitude for Mr. Holder’s presence, saying it would help rebuild trust between U.S. law enforcement and Muslims. “This is a positive step toward engaging a vital community and perhaps one of the most important partners in combating extremism and terrorism in America,” said Wajahat Ali, 30, a lawyer and playwright from Fremont, Calif. “He said exactly what needed to be said. Now those words need to be translated into action.”
In his remarks, Mr. Holder said that stings had been used for decades against many types of crimes. And he defended the investigation last month in Portland, Ore., in which a young Somali-American man, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, 19, was arrested after law enforcement agents said he tried to trigger what he thought was a car bomb at a Christmas tree-lighting ceremony.
“I make no apologies for the how the F.B.I. agents handled their work in executing the operation that led to Mr. Mohamud’s arrest,” Mr. Holder said. “Their efforts helped to identify a person who repeatedly expressed his desire and intention to kill innocent Americans.”
He added: “But you also have my word that the Justice Department will — just as vigorously — continue to pursue anyone who would target Muslims, or their houses of worship.”
Despite the attorney general’s reassurances, some in attendance were deeply concerned by the federal government’s ongoing undercover sting operations.
“I grew up during the civil rights era and I’m aware how the civil rights community was infiltrated by provocateurs and agents who sought to undermine the legitimate struggles of the movement,” said Abu Qadir Al-Amin, 60, an African-American imam from Vallejo, Calif. “So my antennae are up and I try to educate the Muslim community so that they don’t put themselves in a vulnerable position if someone comes along suggesting they do something illegal.”
|
What do you think? I'm posting this here in GD because I really don't see this as a political issue. I am bothered by it because I am asking myself: if he hadn't had help and encouragement from the FBI, would Mohamed Mohamud have tried to carry out these actions on his own? I have my doubts about that. I don't think these kinds of stings are necessary to protect American citizens. I think it's a waste of law enforcement resources, and as I've seen in my own community, actions like this create animosity towards Muslims. They do nothing to build understanding across faiths, which I think is something that could benefit everyone and do more to stop terrorism than "stings" that stink of entrapment.
Share your thoughts, but please remember, this is not in Politics for a reason.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
|