View Single Post
Old 12-11-2010, 09:07 AM   #1 (permalink)
snowy
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Entrapment or saving us from terrorism?

This is a question I've had for a couple weeks now, ever since the FBI arrested Mohamed Mohamud for an attempted bombing at Pioneer Courthouse Square in Portland (read more here: FBI thwarts terrorist bombing attempt at Portland holiday tree lighting, authorities say | OregonLive.com). For those who don't know, Mohamed Mohamud was a sometimes student at the university I graduated from, so this story is very close to home, and it has been kind of surreal to have this all going on in my own backyard. It's also strange to have people overreact and declare that everyone at the treelighting could have died--um, no, they couldn't have, the bomb was a fake. I've had a lot of problems with the language used in the media to describe this case; take the article I posted above. The headline is "FBI thwarts terrorist bombing attempt at Portland holiday tree lighting, authorities say"--in my mind, the FBI didn't thwart anything; they gave a guy a fake bomb, after all.

There was a piece in the NYTimes wherein AG Holder says that these kinds of stings are necessary to protect the American people from terrorism.

Quote:
Holder Tells Muslim Group Stings Are ‘Essential’
By MALIA WOLLAN and CHARLIE SAVAGE

MILLBRAE, Calif. — Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. defended the use of sting operations orchestrated by government informants, telling advocates for Muslim-American civil rights in remarks on Friday night that the tactic is an “essential law enforcement tool in uncovering and preventing terror attacks.”

In a 20-minute speech delivered in this suburb of San Francisco at the annual dinner of Muslim Advocates, a national legal advocacy and civil-rights organization, Mr. Holder rejected criticism by such groups that sting operations amount to improper “entrapment.”   click to show 
What do you think? I'm posting this here in GD because I really don't see this as a political issue. I am bothered by it because I am asking myself: if he hadn't had help and encouragement from the FBI, would Mohamed Mohamud have tried to carry out these actions on his own? I have my doubts about that. I don't think these kinds of stings are necessary to protect American citizens. I think it's a waste of law enforcement resources, and as I've seen in my own community, actions like this create animosity towards Muslims. They do nothing to build understanding across faiths, which I think is something that could benefit everyone and do more to stop terrorism than "stings" that stink of entrapment.

Share your thoughts, but please remember, this is not in Politics for a reason.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76