View Single Post
Old 11-30-2010, 12:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
it's really difficult to say anything about "human nature" because everyone is born into a particular social situation; they're trained to be functional by internalizing aspects of that situation; their capacity to ask questions about human beings in general is entirely conditioned by a particular set of parameters that define being-human in a particular range of ways. human being in general is usually an abstraction based on (possibilities of /variations on) a particular construction of being human.

sometimes i think people invented god so they could pretend there was a some way to escape themselves. you know, if i am conditioned (this in the sense of being shaped in a particular way, not so much in the pavlov sense) then it'd be nice were there something unconditioned....i am specific, so maybe that something should be general....i am going to die, so maybe not going to die....on and on, a series of inversions, a way of daydreaming.

where i live the native american population was already largely dead from smallpox or hepatitis a few years before whitey arrived. whitey of course thought this providential. thank you jesus for the smallpox that took out all those natives. go figure.

the group that would hang out here in the summer spent alot of their time on an island i can see from my deck. they were apparently part of the algonquin somehow. from what i've read of algonquin mythology/history from 19th century maine mostly, they were folk who lived with a basically different sensory arrangement, one much more oriented to sound and other shifting things. they didn't think about geographies in terms of abstract shapes---more networks of sites.
the figures they thought about as parallel to god-types shifted shape all the time.

lately when i've daydreamed about human beings in general i've wondered about basically different sensory arrangements opening onto basically different worlds, like things are always multiple really but we see them through a general frame of reference that assumes reality (whatever that means) is single and that human beings are a type like rocks are or chaise lounges are, all variants on a single core.

maybe the problem is that we, collectively, have no way of thinking about multiplicity.

this started out being about one thing and ended up somewhere else i think.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360