Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
ace, dear, plagiarism doesn't require that one read the book. plagiarism is demonstrable empirically and both the guardian and huffington post articles provide that demonstration.
there's no argument about whether this occurred or not.
and it really is not important whether you like it or not.
the proof is there.
deal with that for once.
|
You made your conclusion, are you certain? Or, like I suggested, "they" told you what to think and now that is what you think?
To me plagiarism is a serious charge, but like many "isms" some simply don't take them serious. Even if someone made that charge against you, I would do my own homework before agreeing with the conclusion. Is that step not necessary in your book?