Well, the "no sue" thing comes closer, in my mind, to a real reason for it. To my mind, the amount of money these CEOs get to keep off the soup line while they look for a new job sounds a bit excessive. I mean, if they are so in demand that they can stipulate these large settlements when they leave a company, then how hard would it be for them to find another position? Unless we have more CEOs than we do positions for CEOs. And if that's the case, wouldn't the laws of supply and demand mean that they would earn less across the board?
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!
|