Originally Posted by Anonymous Member

Personally, for me, if I wanted to get in to a fight with someone, it's not because of a senseless reason like what cyn just posted.

I'm a very patient person, it takes a lot to make me want to lash out physically, this also means I build it up more so that when it does become the tipping point, it's usually overkill time.

I dunno, I feel like that, it could just be some twenty something on the internet talking shit about my background, calling me a hick, insulting my taste in music, telling me I'm stupid, making assumptions about my sex life, making assumptions about my endowment, calling me fat, calling me a faggot, doing everything within their power to try and hurt me with words, in a public venue hiding behind anonymity that doesn't exist because I know who the person is. I wonder why it's not fair to hurt them physically in return. Just because a line of text in some papers stored off in a court somewhere says so. What power does that text really have over me and my ability to avoid the authorities over an act of deserved vigilante justice?

I don't see why the law would protect hateful/hurtful individuals with some sort of mental defect/complex that makes them act like your typical mouthbreathing troll, only the variety that tries to make things much much more personal.

It's people like that that make me feel enabled to act as an agent of teaching a life lesson of putting your money where your mouth is.

nothing will come of it, it just made me wonder how often and likely people get away with it when they do decide to lash out.

Obviously people like this weren't beaten enough by their parents, it almost feels like my civic duty to do it for society's sake.

#superherosyndrome