|
I really don't see anything wrong with what the OP is suggesting, at least nothing wrong enough that I'd wish him sterile.
The caveat, of course, is that he tells the women he intends to impregnate for his evolutionary success plan that his plan is precisely to do so, and that he will be leaving to spread his oats elsewhere.
It's really being too afraid to say the above that makes most people upset with your plan. If you had partners who knew your plans specifically and still consented, then live your dream, eh? The problem with this theory is not the specific details (your reproductive success is actually lessened by the plan) but more the harm you'd be causing others by not involving them in a consentual sexual situation. 'Informed consent' is about so much more than "yes, I want to have sex." If you're doing it with an ulterior motive then your partner hasn't really consented at all.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
|