View Single Post
Old 08-23-2009, 05:12 PM   #25 (permalink)
JumpinJesus
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70 View Post
Forgive the slight threadjack, but it's my thread so whatever...

I don't know if it's just the internet, or if reading comprehension really is getting worse, but it's kind of annoying to get responses telling me to take care of the tickets, or that I shouldn't try to avoid the consequences of my actions, when I've made no such indications. I didn't ask how to get out of the tickets; I didn't even complain that I got them, because even 1mph over is still speeding. I simply asked whether or not the IA ticket would count in IL, because I want to be fully informed about my status under the law. Generally, knowing such information is a good thing. How a simple question like that can be seen as trying to avoid the tickets, I have absolutely no idea.

This is the second time this has happened in the past month too. When I wasn't feeling well and asked for input, I still got a handful of posts telling me nothing more than to go to the doctor, despite the fact that the very first sentence of the thread indicated that I had an appointment for the next day.

Anyway, most of the posts here have been helpful and interesting, but that needed to be said. If I wanted to know how to get out of paying the tickets, I would have asked how to get out of paying the tickets. I didn't.

/rant
When you ask people on an internet forum a question that can very easily be answered with a simple phone call or when you ask for medical advice on the internet, do you really expect to receive anything worthwhile? That you get upset over getting responses you don't want on the internet says more about your motives for posting rather than the reading comprehension skills of those responding.



You stated
Quote:
I want to make sure that I only have one conviction in IL and not two. Unfortunately, traffic school isn't an option because I've had supervision in the past 12 months.
You got two tickets but only want one conviction out of it?

Instead of questioning my reading comprehension (no need to be coy and passive about to whom you were referring) you should ensure that your message is clear and consistent throughout a discussion. This would include not saying you want only one conviction to result from two offenses and then claim you weren't looking to avoid any consequences.

Of course, all this becomes moot if you just follow the speed limit.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360