Maybe we should hash out the details amongst ourselves of how much difference having 16 teams is going to affect the talent pool is going to have on our overall ability to accumulate points. Also make decisions/poll the value of whether "this should net this many points", or whether it is better off higher/lower.
I understand the reasoning in deduction of points slimming, but like Mister Coaster pointed out above, there are some discrepancies.
Also, it seems most of the discrepancies in default points-netting is being skewed to minimize the affect and effectiveness of any team's slotted DEF.
I personally like the position of DEF, because it seems over the years I'm only good at choosing the best ones. I can usually find myself owning Tampa, though last year, in two leagues, I owned both top-scoring Pitt. and Balt. DEF, which helped propel me into the championships.
So, other than that, most of the scoring seems suitable.
---------- Post added at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:56 AM ----------
I do have a suggestion though, could you rachet up the points gained on a safety and blocked kicks?
Those are so rare and hard to come by in an entire season, maybe occurring 5 times on average for each instance throughout over 100 regular season games played.
I'd like to see a safety worth 3 or 4 points, and maybe a blocked kick worth the original 2 points (though I do think 1.5 suits better).
__________________
As human beings, our greatness lies not so much in being able to remake the world (that is the myth of the Atomic Age) as in being able to remake ourselves. —Mohandas K. Gandhi
|