Quote:
Originally Posted by Hain
So let me get this straight... click to show It isn't a reboot... it is like a parallel? A canon story in which the past is altered, allowing them to do whatever they want in the film? |
Meaning that it's Spoiler:
really a reboot. $100 says they take the parallel timeline and go with it for future movies. They're just playing semantics because they think Trek fans are morons - and apparently a lot of them are. I won't lie, I'm going to see it in the theatre, and I may even enjoy it as a space action movie, but I don't expect to like it as a Star Trek movie.
---------- Post added at 01:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:05 PM ----------
Spoiler:
Based on what I know, saying this Star Trek movie isn't a reboot is like saying Sci-Fi's Battlestar Galactica wasn't a reimagining because "all of this has happened before and it will all happen again."