View Single Post
Old 10-18-2008, 02:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
more populist ugliness

this is a report done for al-jazeera about a palin rally in ohio---the location is noted at the beginning and at the end of the clip.

just watch:



i am not entirely sure what to make of this, once past the initial "what the fuck?"

i don't think any of these folk are evil or even particularly stupid--i think they live inside of particular information streams and assemble images of the world and explanations for those images entirely from within those streams. if your information is fucked up and you operate inside that space without relativizing it, you can't help but draw fucked up conclusions. it would happen to most anyone---assuming that you operated in the world in such a way as to either not know about or exclude other information streams, so that this functioned like an environment rather than as a choice. it *really* makes me wonder what passes for information in far right evangelical circles out there.

it is obvious that palin was chosen for the mc-cain ticket because she articulates something of the worldview that these folk share---so stoking the anger and fear that seems to be at its core is a deliberate choice on the part of the campaign.

this does not seem to me to be a strategy that's about winning the election--this is about something else.

and the political space they're playing to has little to do with economic conservatism, little to do with old-school patrician conservatism, nothing at all to do with classical conservatism--this is an ugly product of the blurring out of the line between fundamentalist protestant ideology, hyper-nationalism, and racism---and fear, which is the motor of most things in populist rightwing ideology and has been for a very long time (and this not just in the states).

the mobilization of this population is a direct consequence of the transformation of the right, particularly during it's last period of opposition under clinton. it's sources go back to the reconfiguration of the right across the 1970s.

it seems to me that this constituency is at this point more or less poujadisme redux: the ideology that appears to be mobilizing these folk--and worse the information contexts that are symmterical with this---amounts to a virulent, nasty petit-bourgeois fascism.

i hesitated to post this, but there have now been enough clips in various threads here and available elsewhere from different parts of the country to demonstrate that this is not really just about these folk in ohio in particular. they are representative of the kind of movement that the far right of the conservative coalition, embodied by sarah palin in many ways, and of the state that it is being encouraged to work itself up into.

so the questions:

a) the palin nomination appears to be geared toward this population. it is now totally obvious that she was not chosen because she had any real hope of attracting moderates or independents--she was chosen because she speaks to the populist far right.
do you think that is accurate?
if it is, what the strategy behind it?

because if the above is correct, it seems a totally counterintuitive way to run a campaign for president of a united states.

b) if the republicans loose in november, what do you think they'll do with a constituency like this as a significant aspect of their base?

this has come up in other threads, but to repose it here:
it looks like the period of cross-over for this hyper-nationalist, xenophobic stuff began right after 9/11/2001 and ebbed a little into the second bush term. the "war on terror" enabled it and the fiasco in iraq did it in. for a while, this was the mainstream discourse about the world (remember? you were there....) the base for it was laid by 8 years of organizational and media building by the right under clinton.

if that discourse has lost it's traction, but it remains the central ideological linkage to this population, do you think it'll prevent the republicans from being able to retool their politics?

because if mc-cain looses, it seems to me that the republicans are going to have to reconsider the way they frame themselves, and so retool their language.


aside: this is ugly shit. i think it astonishing that the mc-cain campaign is irresponsible enough to encourage this, to stoke it, to play with it, to use it.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360