Quote:
Originally Posted by Grancey
In the federal child pornography law, the definition of what is a pornographic image includes whether the image is intended to elicit a sexual response in its consumer or viewer. I believe this is the angle they are using in this situation, and due do the circumstances here I believe they have a case.
|
Agreed. I say prosecute the SOBs.
Hunting down celebs is fine, if that's your bag, but when their minor children are involved, that's a whole other ball game.