Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2008, 03:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Jamie Lynn Spears breastfeeding photos = child porn?

Quote:
Mommy Pics of Brit's Sis Trigger Criminal Probe

Law enforcement sources tell TMZ federal and local authorities are on the hunt for someone peddling 12 pics of Britney Spears, Jamie Lynn, daughter Maddie and baby daddy Casey Aldridge. One of the pictures shows Jamie Lynn breast feeding Maddie -- Jamie Lynn's left breast is exposed.

The pics were taken on Casey's digital camera. We're told he took the camera card to his local Wal-Mart in Louisiana for copies. Law enforcement believes someone at the Wal-Mart may have made extra copies, then tried selling them.

Because Jamie Lynn is a minor, selling the pics -- or buying them -- could constitute a violation of federal laws prohibiting child pornography. Peddling pictures of a minor's breast -- even if not taken for sexual purposes -- could land the seller and the buyer in federal prison if they are marketed across state lines for the purpose of being lurid. Also, anyone purchasing the pics could be prosecuted for the crime of receiving stolen property.

Other pics in the set include Britney holding the baby and one of Jamie Lynn, Britney, Bryan (Brit's bro), Lynne Spears and Jamie Spears around Jamie Lynn's hospital bed. There are also pics of Maddie by herself, and there's a picture of Jamie Lynn in a negligee holding the baby.

Authorities are trying to find the man who is attempting to sell the photos. In addition, we're told Britney's lawyers are thinking about going after Wal-Mart for the alleged security breach.
Do you agree that this is child porn and should be prosecuted as such?

I say get a printer for home. It's not like they are lacking in the money.

However....yes, she's underage, but in all the breastfeeding pics I've seen from friends who have had kids and such, it's not like you're seeing the full on boob. They are mainly made up of the back of the head of the baby and some cleavage. Of course, there are some nipple-latching pics...which may be present in this batch of Spears' drama....but if it was just cleavage crap, then it's probably as much as you'd see w/ some chick in a two piece.

Still, I don't believe it's child porn, but it may be inappropriate in some manner.

Also...isn't possession of underage nude photos a crime? If Casey took these (yes he's a minor as well), shouldn't he be charged?
UKking is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Delicious
 
Reese's Avatar
 
LMAO. No it's not child porn. The child exploitation took place more than 9 months ago when she got knocked up. I do believe it's been proven in court over and over that nude photography in a non-sexual situation is not illegal. There's no way her breast feeding could be anywhere near the Miley Cyrus photo.

Edited because I like to respond before I read the story thoroughly.
__________________
“It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick” - Dave Barry

Last edited by Reese; 09-22-2008 at 03:59 PM..
Reese is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
pig
pigglet pigglet
 
pig's Avatar
 
Location: Locash
porn...maybe? depends. pretty crappy to steal someone's baby pictures and sell them on the internet, regardless. that's just pathetic.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
pig is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 06:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
I'm a family man - I run a family business.
 
Redjake's Avatar
 
Location: Wilson, NC
Pics or it didn't happen!
__________________
Off the record, on the q.t., and very hush-hush.
Redjake is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 06:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
No, it's not. Can we all come together and finally not care about celebrities? Please? I'll give everyone a dollar, up to 80,000 people.
Willravel is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
change is hard.
 
thespian86's Avatar
 
Location: the green room.
I will take 80,000 not to talk about them again.

And I think the question has to do with the situation. Sure, the "celebrity" is the reason why its being talked about in the first place but because she is sixteen, is it okay for her to have nude photo's circulated?

Isn't that illegal? Especially if it's being sold?
__________________
EX: Whats new?
ME: I officially love coffee more then you now.
EX: uh...
ME: So, not much.
thespian86 is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
eats puppies and shits rainbows
 
RetroGunslinger's Avatar
 
Location: An Area of Space Occupied by a Population, SC, USA
While on a technicality it is illegal, I wouldn't call it child porn.
__________________
It's a rare pleasure in this world to get your mind fucked. Usually it's just foreplay.

M.B. Keene
RetroGunslinger is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I don't really think of breastfeeding as nudity per se. Laws about child nudity are there to prevent sexual predators from taking advantage of minors in a sexual manner. This is about profit. These pics could possibly make the photographer hundreds of thousands of dollars from some rag.

As to it's legality, I'm not sure.
Willravel is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
Life's short, gotta hurry...
 
Grancey's Avatar
 
Location: land of pit vipers
In the federal child pornography law, the definition of what is a pornographic image includes whether the image is intended to elicit a sexual response in its consumer or viewer. I believe this is the angle they are using in this situation, and due do the circumstances here I believe they have a case.
__________________
Quiet, mild-mannered souls might just turn out to be roaring lions of two-fisted cool.
Grancey is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Minion of Joss
 
levite's Avatar
 
Location: The Windy City
Porn? No. Idiotic? Yes.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love,
Whose soul is sense, cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
That thing which elemented it.

(From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne)
levite is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 02:02 AM   #11 (permalink)
Eponymous
 
jewels's Avatar
 
Location: Central Central Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grancey View Post
In the federal child pornography law, the definition of what is a pornographic image includes whether the image is intended to elicit a sexual response in its consumer or viewer. I believe this is the angle they are using in this situation, and due do the circumstances here I believe they have a case.
Agreed. I say prosecute the SOBs.

Hunting down celebs is fine, if that's your bag, but when their minor children are involved, that's a whole other ball game.
__________________
We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess.
Mark Twain
jewels is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 04:58 AM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Daval's Avatar
 
Location: The True North Strong and Free!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jewels View Post
Agreed. I say prosecute the SOBs.

Hunting down celebs is fine, if that's your bag, but when their minor children are involved, that's a whole other ball game.
Ditto. These scum need to be slapped with a stiff jail sentance.
__________________
"It is impossible to obtain a conviction for sodomy from an English jury. Half of them don't believe that it can physically be done, and the other half are doing it."
Winston Churchill
Daval is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 05:27 AM   #13 (permalink)
She's Actual Size
 
CinnamonGirl's Avatar
 
Location: Central Republic of Where-in-the-Hell
*blink* Well, my first response is... how much money do these people have? And he's going to Wal*Mart? Seriously.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
No, it's not. Can we all come together and finally not care about celebrities? Please? I'll give everyone a dollar, up to 80,000 people.
I'll submit $20 to the cause, which ups it to 80,020 people!
__________________
"...for though she was ordinary, she possessed health, wit, courage, charm, and cheerfulness. But because she was not beautiful, no one ever seemed to notice these other qualities, which is so often the way of the world."


"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?"
CinnamonGirl is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 05:53 AM   #14 (permalink)
More Than You Expect
 
Manic_Skafe's Avatar
 
Location: Queens
I used to work in a one hour photo a few years ago and after having to process everything from scantily clad teens to hardcore porn I can't help but to wonder what the hell makes people feel so comfortable dropping off anything that could be considered questionable for processing.

And with public breastfeeding being legally protected in most states and it generally becoming much more socially accepted, I can't believe so easily that there was a deep-seeded sexually exploitve element here. I just see idiocy on both sides of the counter.

Who wouldn't be tempted to double their yearly salary by selling two of those images?

Fire the employee and make their idiocy public but jail is just a bit too much.
__________________
"Porn is a zoo of exotic animals that becomes boring upon ownership." -Nersesian
Manic_Skafe is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 08:00 AM   #15 (permalink)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~
 
*Nikki*'s Avatar
 
Location: Charleston, SC
The most idiotic part of this story occurred when the photos were taken to WalMart for processing. Anything after that should be considered legal and fair game.
*Nikki* is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 08:20 AM   #16 (permalink)
After School Special Moralist
 
Location: Large City, Texas.
Track down the creeps that swiped the photos, & give them some jail time, if for no other reason than to send a message that they crossed the line be it ethical or legal.

As for the idiot that took the photos to Wal-Mart...some people are total idiots.
__________________
In a society where the individual is not free to pursue the truth...there is neither progress, stability nor security.--Edward R. Murrow
Anormalguy is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 02:19 AM   #17 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Makedde's Avatar
 
Location: Australia
Quote:
Because Jamie Lynn is a minor, selling the pics -- or buying them -- could constitute a violation of federal laws prohibiting child pornography. Peddling pictures of a minor's breast -- even if not taken for sexual purposes -- could land the seller and the buyer in federal prison if they are marketed across state lines for the purpose of being lurid. Also, anyone purchasing the pics could be prosecuted for the crime of receiving stolen property.
I don't believe the photos are child pornography. Jamie Lynn is just another mother breastfeeding her newborn infant.
However, to take such photos when her gaurd was down, and then to make an attempt to sell them, well, the person responsible should be charged. Anyone who tries to make cash of a breastfeeding mother should be charged with an offence, in my opinion, no matter how old the mother happens to be.
__________________
Sun flames and moons glow, timeless the tides will flow, what will I face, what will be mine, fortune and fate the other side...
Makedde is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 03:00 AM   #18 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
I would like the next administration to develop a laser beam to eradicate this family and any others like it.

I would prefer painful rectal drip to discussing the Spears family.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet
Poppinjay is offline  
 

Tags
breastfeeding, child, jamie, lynn, photos, porn, spears


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:45 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360