Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
We need more doctors in Congress like the good Senator Tom Coburn, M.D.(R-OK)? “Pre-marital sex is dangerous, even deadly..."
or
"The gay...agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom we face today. Why do you think we see the rationalization for abortion and multiple sexual partners? Thats a gay agenda"
Doctors dont sensationalize?
He should really leave such sensationalism to his chief of staff, Michael Schwartz: "...the abortion providers are the main proponents of sex ed because they want more kids having sex, getting pregnant and contracting STD’s, so that they can perform more abortions, treat more VD and make more money" ***
Ustwo...is there any independent study you have seen that concludes that abstinence only education is more effective (or even as`equally effective) than a more comprehensive sex education program...or that justifies the expenditure of more than $1/2 billion by the Bush administration in the last 7 years. |
DC I don't really give a shit about what kind of sex education we give our children, I'm sure it will be the same high caliber as the basic union education they get. Its why I'm sending my kids to private school at great expense when the time comes.
You can find examples of doctors and scientists doing the same stuff as lawyers and I'm sure you can find a lawyer who knows how to decipher what a scientific paper really means, and find any flaws in the methodology, but a good doctor/scientist knows how to interpret data, a good lawyer knows how to manipulate it for his clients/sides gain.
This is what congress is all about. I have a side, how can I manipulate this data to support my side.