|
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Randle2I
To tat your tit (  ) Blu Ray while technically better had no real advantage as far as most consumers are concerned. HD-DVD had the better naming scheme, was cheaper, and the standard was more mature. Unless you're a huge movie buff you're not going to see, let alone care that there was compromised encoding or high end audio. I'm glad it's over, but I'm sad Blu Ray won. |
I dunno about not being able to tell. Here's a rather good look with side by sides. It's now a matter of really how much someone is willing to pay for that perfect picture...
Apple TV 2.0 vs. Blu-Ray, DVD & HD Cable: The Comparison
edit: sorry I added the title only to see that it was HD cable and not HD DVD to compare with Blu-ray. It is still a nice comparison by itself.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|